From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: mail@birger-koblitz.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next,v3,1/2] r8152: Add support for 5Gbit Link Speeds and EEE
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 11:55:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260324105523.385444-1-pabeni@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260320-rtl8157_next-v3-1-1aefeca7fda7@birger-koblitz.de>
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
For local reproduction steps see https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html
---
r8152: Add support for 5Gbit Link Speeds and EEE
The RTL8157 supports 5GBit Link speeds. Add support for this speed
in the setup and setting/getting through ethtool. Also add 5GBit EEE.
Add functionality for setup and ethtool get/set methods.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
> index 3b6d4252d34c..bab8e10e5f99 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -6343,15 +6356,20 @@ static int rtl8152_set_speed(struct r8152 *tp, u8 autoneg, u32 speed, u8 duplex,
> r8152_mdio_write(tp, MII_CTRL1000, new1);
> }
>
> - if (tp->support_2500full) {
> + if (tp->support_2500full || tp->support_5000full) {
> orig = ocp_reg_read(tp, OCP_10GBT_CTRL);
> - new1 = orig & ~MDIO_AN_10GBT_CTRL_ADV2_5G;
> + new1 = orig & ~(MDIO_AN_10GBT_CTRL_ADV2_5G | MDIO_AN_10GBT_CTRL_ADV5G);
>
> if (advertising & RTL_ADVERTISED_2500_FULL) {
> new1 |= MDIO_AN_10GBT_CTRL_ADV2_5G;
> tp->ups_info.speed_duplex = NWAY_2500M_FULL;
> }
>
> + if (advertising & RTL_ADVERTISED_5000_FULL) {
> + new1 |= MDIO_AN_10GBT_CTRL_ADV5G;
> + tp->ups_info.speed_duplex = NWAY_5000M_FULL;
> + }
> +
> if (orig != new1)
> ocp_reg_write(tp, OCP_10GBT_CTRL, new1);
> }
Does r8156_ups_flags() correctly handle the new NWAY_5000M_FULL value?
When 5000M is advertised, rtl8152_set_speed() stores NWAY_5000M_FULL
(enum value 11) in tp->ups_info.speed_duplex. However, r8156_ups_flags()
has a switch statement that only handles values up to NWAY_2500M_FULL
(value 10):
drivers/net/usb/r8152.c:r8156_ups_flags() {
switch (tp->ups_info.speed_duplex) {
case NWAY_10M_HALF:
return ups_flags_speed(UPS_FLAGS_SPEED_10);
case NWAY_10M_FULL:
return ups_flags_speed(UPS_FLAGS_SPEED_10);
case NWAY_100M_HALF:
return ups_flags_speed(UPS_FLAGS_SPEED_100);
case NWAY_100M_FULL:
return ups_flags_speed(UPS_FLAGS_SPEED_100);
case NWAY_1000M_FULL:
return ups_flags_speed(UPS_FLAGS_SPEED_1000);
case NWAY_2500M_FULL:
return ups_flags_speed(UPS_FLAGS_SPEED_2500);
default:
break;
}
}
The new NWAY_5000M_FULL falls through to 'default: break;', which means
ups_flags_speed() is never called. This results in incorrect UPS flags
(speed bits = 0) being written to the USB_UPS_FLAGS hardware register via
ocp_write_dword().
When the device enters UPS power saving mode at 5000M link speed, will the
hardware receive correct speed information?
The follow-up commit defca1127dd51 ('r8152: Add support for the RTL8157
hardware') enables support_5000full for RTL_VER_16 but also does not add a
NWAY_5000M_FULL case to r8156_ups_flags().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-24 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-20 11:14 [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] r8152: Add support for the RTL8157 5Gbit USB Ethernet chip Birger Koblitz
2026-03-20 11:14 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] r8152: Add support for 5Gbit Link Speeds and EEE Birger Koblitz
2026-03-24 10:55 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2026-03-24 15:49 ` [net-next,v3,1/2] " Birger Koblitz
2026-03-20 11:14 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] r8152: Add support for the RTL8157 hardware Birger Koblitz
2026-03-24 10:55 ` [net-next,v3,2/2] " Paolo Abeni
2026-03-24 16:55 ` Birger Koblitz
2026-03-24 10:58 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] " Paolo Abeni
2026-03-24 17:00 ` Birger Koblitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260324105523.385444-1-pabeni@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mail@birger-koblitz.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox