From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from BN1PR04CU002.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eastus2azon11010059.outbound.protection.outlook.com [52.101.56.59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D44563FB05D; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 12:31:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=fail smtp.client-ip=52.101.56.59 ARC-Seal:i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774355514; cv=fail; b=q+wHgnm8HUrfvpkhM/+ZotEjubfkxHDsn/w00BhR60h1cXXmnYuWbzHhtkt4w+pYoygu1x+NGOZSFo+SOzBdiCRxFWApQuUMChbGaSH2uwhOjVC/lz+/7P1KlHwmMFNfRXDOnQYTJu2qNgVUgAr+UpTLag4WY0s+XXOjlkR8QBE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774355514; c=relaxed/simple; bh=44fJ4asWbtDn0YA2Tiw2NAaqV7jtVauRw9ZzZhKjQeU=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=tHjoUInxXs1Mn6vw0EQUA25dwHKJBQ6SKT5VvvFvnLniG1RvOG7fDGdJKpqUocMV9KaBkpxXNyVL0LvxchS8r4YCkkQdBku3vXCKRqK/vLqNbVdNH60HA36kJILwNa8ic0lrzyjVmccN1m95AsE6fZGRNu5CbgiUCbA1tL7MS3M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=2; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=nvidia.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=Nvidia.com header.i=@Nvidia.com header.b=GAcmfUl+; arc=fail smtp.client-ip=52.101.56.59 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=nvidia.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=Nvidia.com header.i=@Nvidia.com header.b="GAcmfUl+" ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=OKAhK4VpnlwbHJsbW0v3MbbobxgvBb6f8JY/Qc934rMxKRukX+r8QpdeH/UaV1h9r8f5WsI4JPoWsNhIiNy5YjFlKuF4hLLSl0zEMCXNHfEf8I3nGeDZvcLHy2KJJclQs6ryxOoWJ5CvPe+4L7OhmpsnrbMYYqTY4qxUBgmA6tqs4+rOwVc8hbEPKegmFmrE/b0E/n4/yFhdb5LFKbyX8M0wmwSTQoXr9Q3O6MU+tSwLIkD6ewq/Yzh946BgK8QRWHaLjSQ/qSw+VOhcutkfG5osNUDSSpW8rQew8u1Xq17oWtOwTe91wp9XS4nHe7A6BsthUSh2rql1HUia4wNQlw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=ZqjUp9YInRG7lY8V2ayrljQvVVBH8B0sYcfz2KZ6gQY=; b=HtDGaXyOzo1BNOTIpMat8knumvatca/xFfsOcqMe8tBJ7Zv0r729CUPDVAY7JEVa7Ncxv2mFDyAtNRnRfVdCGG6Loz9q/1O2aYS4qahJrfzhpbtyOz0/G/9W821XEe+5o4kEiQOs/kgEp2eLW90Rc+MWDpU1RDE4pune7yxane9O6e4uPLJkdCx/zLXArmqgK2INAdpCzh8/O71+GPz0LrUYX+BvAOzFCuGQUWmzQfaT6IVCxfBQtmlHU3lqDx5de7qkAkFpRU827qfeTAqZzCfRQ/MSfOqh7nY7/1kG20KR9dJuZmXdborpUiZkDR54PF/33Qb6gXSiXe3HB2r5wg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 216.228.117.161) smtp.rcpttodomain=google.com smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dmarc=pass (p=reject sp=reject pct=100) action=none header.from=nvidia.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none (0) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Nvidia.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ZqjUp9YInRG7lY8V2ayrljQvVVBH8B0sYcfz2KZ6gQY=; b=GAcmfUl+3FatpPet2bmixV11nMXg9x24/CCh4hnpI3CacYifSpvpBn9GvJdLCHt/kXW+aT1pSt9RmKo8qjCnt+rz9km2xoQwiv9atwdPysFgT/OLCvKn655m8G8MYTydj67exdIU/y76GTTU5ktg69lCs9RAEsrtawfkS+1ox3U41KN+9wSuqhWjZ+RiVBv3Rud/gHAcgeQe+6E/IuJLctrQEN7stAqV+yl5/llW07bBnz6BHz1DJP6wloetuvdgc6aeZpN+pU/BsYiiMXzQTYaS4B7QtGBy7AIE7OEkPzE6iJesuSqeTpQkL0Lw7FefrNiPz9ix+3tm885bBIL+dQ== Received: from PH8PR02CA0017.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:510:2d0::20) by DS2PR12MB9589.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:8:279::7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.9723.19; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 12:31:46 +0000 Received: from SN1PEPF000252A3.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:510:2d0:cafe::ad) by PH8PR02CA0017.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:510:2d0::20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.9723.31 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 12:31:43 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 216.228.117.161) smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nvidia.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of nvidia.com designates 216.228.117.161 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=216.228.117.161; helo=mail.nvidia.com; pr=C Received: from mail.nvidia.com (216.228.117.161) by SN1PEPF000252A3.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.167.242.10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.9723.19 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 12:31:45 +0000 Received: from rnnvmail204.nvidia.com (10.129.68.6) by mail.nvidia.com (10.129.200.67) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.20; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 05:31:24 -0700 Received: from rnnvmail204.nvidia.com (10.129.68.6) by rnnvmail204.nvidia.com (10.129.68.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.20; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 05:31:24 -0700 Received: from vdi.nvidia.com (10.127.8.10) by mail.nvidia.com (10.129.68.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.2.2562.20 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 05:31:15 -0700 From: Tariq Toukan To: Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" CC: Donald Hunter , Simon Horman , Jiri Pirko , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Saeed Mahameed , "Leon Romanovsky" , Tariq Toukan , Mark Bloch , Chuck Lever , "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" , Cosmin Ratiu , "Carolina Jubran" , Daniel Zahka , "Shay Drory" , Kees Cook , Daniel Jurgens , Moshe Shemesh , Adithya Jayachandran , Willem de Bruijn , David Wei , Petr Machata , Stanislav Fomichev , Vadim Fedorenko , , , , , , Gal Pressman , Jiri Pirko Subject: [PATCH net-next V8 13/14] selftests: drv-net: Add test for cross-esw rate scheduling Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 14:28:47 +0200 Message-ID: <20260324122848.36731-14-tariqt@nvidia.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.44.0 In-Reply-To: <20260324122848.36731-1-tariqt@nvidia.com> References: <20260324122848.36731-1-tariqt@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-NV-OnPremToCloud: ExternallySecured X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: SN1PEPF000252A3:EE_|DS2PR12MB9589:EE_ X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: fd233651-4d2d-424f-4f7b-08de89a14fe6 X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;ARA:13230040|82310400026|36860700016|7416014|376014|1800799024|56012099003|22082099003|18002099003; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:216.228.117.161;CTRY:US;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:mail.nvidia.com;PTR:dc6edge2.nvidia.com;CAT:NONE;SFS:(13230040)(82310400026)(36860700016)(7416014)(376014)(1800799024)(56012099003)(22082099003)(18002099003);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0: CdMZgxxqn6GJxCPUgbS0IiSB4eGvbq57J2hdDS8pZzsig1eSwxiT9KhBtx7/jyCYELJpWNnDv+pBz+AzFJOXVTj0RVFq5pu0I+jv6H/wqfMOJZUwNhjwUILZGQTk+xjpZNqOAUEIktIMJC8zeM/xE9uN0hGkE/hr0AIGABM3c1Ci1n+eTHCzRcWz+PtikU5Nn3u+u6x8MY80zD9QeMUZGDf1X5z5Uy5baJw0PUS7eYtNkHdrAuGiTdtPvlrBz5ViRrUx70hrNcDkjNv6ZjOE7qh812TNKHT53oUy5ctWFeOW5sum8r0g7niQrSKSn2eN1qAcYl6N6kkQt/XLy1wPffJ3DJzZcjvcVN1b/SByt87k91y3BLc3K35d2K+aFPqT+CGk5+EyknGVIdIchGdAsAHNQ+zWHIgRpNOtgwzYafpHvMcsTPhWeYdjVSvlW7oh X-OriginatorOrg: Nvidia.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Mar 2026 12:31:45.4950 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: fd233651-4d2d-424f-4f7b-08de89a14fe6 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a;Ip=[216.228.117.161];Helo=[mail.nvidia.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: SN1PEPF000252A3.namprd05.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DS2PR12MB9589 From: Cosmin Ratiu Adds a Python selftest using the YNL devlink API to verify the devlink rate ops. The test requires a bond device given in the config as NETIF containing two PFs. Test setup will then create 1 VF on each PF and verify the various rate commands. ./devlink_rate_cross_esw.py TAP version 13 1..3 ok 1 devlink_rate_cross_esw.test_same_esw_parent ok 2 devlink_rate_cross_esw.test_cross_esw_parent ok 3 devlink_rate_cross_esw.test_tx_rates_on_cross_esw Tests will be skipped when the preconditions aren't met, when the devlink API is too old or when the devices don't appear to support cross-esw scheduling (detected via EOPNOTSUPP). Signed-off-by: Cosmin Ratiu Reviewed-by: Carolina Jubran Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan --- .../testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/Makefile | 1 + .../drivers/net/hw/devlink_rate_cross_esw.py | 300 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 301 insertions(+) create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/devlink_rate_cross_esw.py diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/Makefile index 3c97dac9baaa..361fbb9fd44b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/Makefile @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ TEST_GEN_FILES := \ TEST_PROGS = \ csum.py \ devlink_port_split.py \ + devlink_rate_cross_esw.py \ devlink_rate_tc_bw.py \ devmem.py \ ethtool.sh \ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/devlink_rate_cross_esw.py b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/devlink_rate_cross_esw.py new file mode 100755 index 000000000000..0f3b4516c3b7 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/devlink_rate_cross_esw.py @@ -0,0 +1,300 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env python3 +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +""" +Devlink Rate Cross-eswitch Scheduling Test Suite +================================================== + +Control-plane tests for cross-eswitch TX scheduling via devlink-rate. +Validates that VFs from different PFs on the same chip can share +rate groups using the cross-device parent-dev attribute. + +Preconditions: +- NETIF points to a bond device with exactly two interfaces. +- the interfaces must be two PFs from different devices sharing the same chip. +- (for mlx5): the two interfaces are in switchdev mode and configured in a LAG: + - devlink dev eswitch set $DEV1 mode switchdev + - devlink dev eswitch set $DEV2 mode switchdev + - devlink dev param set $DEV1 name esw_multiport value 1 cmode runtime + - devlink dev param set $DEV2 name esw_multiport value 1 cmode runtime +- test cases will be skipped if: + - the number of interfaces in the bond device is != 2. + - the kernel doesn't support devlink rates. + - the devlink API doesn't support cross-device parents (ENODEV). + - cross-esw rate scheduling returns EOPNOTSUPP. +""" + +import errno +import glob +import os +import time + +from lib.py import ksft_pr, ksft_eq, ksft_run, ksft_exit +from lib.py import KsftSkipEx, KsftFailEx +from lib.py import NetDrvEnv, DevlinkFamily +from lib.py import NlError +from lib.py import cmd, defer, ip, tool + + +# --- Discovery and setup --- + + +def get_bond_slaves(bond_ifname): + """Returns sorted list of slave netdev names for a bond.""" + pattern = f"/sys/class/net/{bond_ifname}/lower_*" + lowers = glob.glob(pattern) + if not lowers: + raise KsftSkipEx(f"No bond slaves for {bond_ifname}") + slaves = [] + for path in sorted(lowers): + name = os.path.basename(path) + if name.startswith("lower_"): + name = name[len("lower_"):] + slaves.append(name) + return slaves + + +def discover_pfs(cfg): + """Discovers both PFs from bond slaves.""" + slaves = get_bond_slaves(cfg.ifname) + if len(slaves) != 2: + raise KsftSkipEx(f"Need 2 bond slaves, found {len(slaves)}") + + pf0, pf1 = slaves[0], slaves[1] + ksft_pr(f"PF0: {pf0} PF1: {pf1}") + return pf0, pf1 + + +def get_pci_addr(ifname): + """Resolves PCI address for a network interface.""" + return os.path.basename(os.path.realpath(f"/sys/class/net/{ifname}/device")) + + +def get_vf_port_index(pf_pci): + """Finds devlink port-index for vf0 under pf_pci.""" + ports = tool("devlink", "port show", json=True)["port"] + for port_name, props in ports.items(): + if port_name.startswith(f"pci/{pf_pci}/") and props.get("vfnum") == 0: + return int(port_name.split("/")[-1]) + raise KsftSkipEx(f"VF port not found for {pf_pci}") + + +def cleanup_esw(pf): + """Removes VFs if created by tests.""" + cmd(f"echo 0 > /sys/class/net/{pf}/device/sriov_numvfs", shell=True, fail=False) + + +def setup_esw(pf): + """Creates 1 VF on 'pf'.""" + path = f"/sys/class/net/{pf}/device/sriov_numvfs" + cmd(f"echo 0 > {path}", shell=True) + cmd(f"echo 1 > {path}", shell=True) + time.sleep(2) + + vf_dir = f"/sys/class/net/{pf}/device/virtfn0/net" + entries = os.listdir(vf_dir) if os.path.isdir(vf_dir) else [] + if not entries: + raise KsftSkipEx(f"VF not found for {pf}") + ip(f"link set dev {entries[0]} up") + + pf_pci = get_pci_addr(pf) + vf_idx = get_vf_port_index(pf_pci) + ksft_pr(f"Created VF {vf_idx} on PF {pf} ({pf_pci})") + return pf_pci, vf_idx + + +# --- Rate operation helpers --- + + +def rate_new(devnl, dev_pci, node_name, **kwargs): + """Creates rate node.""" + params = { + "bus-name": "pci", + "dev-name": dev_pci, + "rate-node-name": node_name, + } + params.update(kwargs) + try: + devnl.rate_new(params) + except NlError as e: + if e.error == errno.EOPNOTSUPP: + raise KsftSkipEx("rate_new not supported") from e + raise KsftFailEx("rate_new failed") from e + + +def rate_get(devnl, dev_pci, node_name): + """Gets rate node.""" + params = { + "bus-name": "pci", + "dev-name": dev_pci, + "rate-node-name": node_name, + } + return devnl.rate_get(params) + + +def rate_get_leaf(devnl, dev_pci, port_index): + """Gets rate leaf (VF).""" + params = { + "bus-name": "pci", + "dev-name": dev_pci, + "port-index": port_index, + } + return devnl.rate_get(params) + + +def rate_del(devnl, dev_pci, node_name): + """Deletes rate node.""" + devnl.rate_del({ + "bus-name": "pci", + "dev-name": dev_pci, + "rate-node-name": node_name, + }) + + +def rate_set_leaf(devnl, dev_pci, port_index, **kwargs): + """Sets rate attributes on a leaf (VF).""" + params = { + "bus-name": "pci", + "dev-name": dev_pci, + "port-index": port_index, + } + params.update(kwargs) + try: + devnl.rate_set(params) + except NlError as e: + if e.error == errno.EOPNOTSUPP: + raise KsftSkipEx("rate_set not supported") from e + raise KsftFailEx("rate_set failed") from e + + +def rate_set_leaf_parent(devnl, dev_pci, port_index, + parent_name, parent_dev_pci=None): + """Sets a leaf's parent, optionally cross-esw.""" + params = { + "bus-name": "pci", + "dev-name": dev_pci, + "port-index": port_index, + "rate-parent-node-name": parent_name, + } + if parent_dev_pci: + params["parent-dev"] = { + "bus-name": "pci", + "dev-name": parent_dev_pci, + } + try: + devnl.rate_set(params) + except NlError as e: + if e.error == errno.EOPNOTSUPP: + raise KsftSkipEx("rate_set not supported") from e + if parent_dev_pci and e.error == errno.ENODEV: + raise KsftSkipEx("Cross-esw scheduling not supported") from e + raise KsftFailEx("rate_set failed") from e + + +def rate_clear_leaf_parent(devnl, dev_pci, port_index): + """Clears a leaf's parent.""" + rate_set_leaf_parent(devnl, dev_pci, port_index, "") + + +def rate_set_node(devnl, dev_pci, node_name, **kwargs): + """Sets rate attributes on a node.""" + params = { + "bus-name": "pci", + "dev-name": dev_pci, + "rate-node-name": node_name, + } + params.update(kwargs) + devnl.rate_set(params) + + +# --- Test cases --- + + +def test_same_esw_parent(cfg): + """Assigns PF0's VF to PF0's group (same esw baseline).""" + pf0, _ = discover_pfs(cfg) + pf0_pci, vf0_idx = setup_esw(pf0) + defer(cleanup_esw, pf0) + + rate_new(cfg.devnl, pf0_pci, "group0") + defer(rate_del, cfg.devnl, pf0_pci, "group0") + ksft_pr("rate-new succeeded") + + rate_set_leaf_parent(cfg.devnl, pf0_pci, vf0_idx, "group0") + defer(rate_clear_leaf_parent, cfg.devnl, pf0_pci, vf0_idx) + + ksft_pr("Same-esw parent assignment succeeded") + + +def test_cross_esw_parent(cfg): + """Sets cross-esw parent, then clear it.""" + pf0, pf1 = discover_pfs(cfg) + pf0_pci, _ = setup_esw(pf0) + defer(cleanup_esw, pf0) + pf1_pci, vf1_idx = setup_esw(pf1) + defer(cleanup_esw, pf1) + + rate_new(cfg.devnl, pf0_pci, "group1") + defer(rate_del, cfg.devnl, pf0_pci, "group1") + ksft_pr("rate-new succeeded") + + rate_set_leaf_parent(cfg.devnl, pf1_pci, vf1_idx, + "group1", parent_dev_pci=pf0_pci) + defer(rate_clear_leaf_parent, cfg.devnl, pf1_pci, vf1_idx) + + ksft_pr("Cross-esw parent set and clear succeeded") + + +def test_tx_rates_on_cross_esw(cfg): + """Sets tx_max on group and tx_share on leaves in a cross-esw setup.""" + pf0, pf1 = discover_pfs(cfg) + pf0_pci, vf0_idx = setup_esw(pf0) + defer(cleanup_esw, pf0) + pf1_pci, vf1_idx = setup_esw(pf1) + defer(cleanup_esw, pf1) + + rate_new(cfg.devnl, pf0_pci, "group2", **{"rate-tx-max": 10000000}) + defer(rate_del, cfg.devnl, pf0_pci, "group2") + ksft_pr("rate-new succeeded") + + rate_set_leaf_parent(cfg.devnl, pf1_pci, vf1_idx, + "group2", parent_dev_pci=pf0_pci) + defer(rate_clear_leaf_parent, cfg.devnl, pf1_pci, vf1_idx) + ksft_pr("set parent cross-esw succeeded") + + rate_set_leaf_parent(cfg.devnl, pf0_pci, vf0_idx, "group2") + defer(rate_clear_leaf_parent, cfg.devnl, pf0_pci, vf0_idx) + ksft_pr("set parent same esw succeeded") + + rate_set_leaf(cfg.devnl, pf0_pci, vf0_idx, **{"rate-tx-share": 1000000}) + rate = rate_get_leaf(cfg.devnl, pf0_pci, vf0_idx) + ksft_eq(rate["rate-tx-share"], 1000000) + rate_set_leaf(cfg.devnl, pf1_pci, vf1_idx, **{"rate-tx-share": 2000000}) + rate = rate_get_leaf(cfg.devnl, pf1_pci, vf1_idx) + ksft_eq(rate["rate-tx-share"], 2000000) + rate_set_node(cfg.devnl, pf0_pci, "group2", **{"rate-tx-max": 250000000}) + rate = rate_get(cfg.devnl, pf0_pci, "group2") + ksft_eq(rate["rate-tx-max"], 250000000) + + ksft_pr("tx_max and tx_share set on cross-esw group") + + +def main() -> None: + """Main function.""" + + with NetDrvEnv(__file__, nsim_test=False) as cfg: + cfg.devnl = DevlinkFamily() + + ksft_run( + cases=[ + test_same_esw_parent, + test_cross_esw_parent, + test_tx_rates_on_cross_esw, + ], + args=(cfg,), + ) + ksft_exit() + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + main() -- 2.44.0