From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from CO1PR03CU002.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-westus2azon11010010.outbound.protection.outlook.com [52.101.46.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0192C3F54C7; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 12:29:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=fail smtp.client-ip=52.101.46.10 ARC-Seal:i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774355398; cv=fail; b=TYqj14Foz3AJREHGe0NcOUrNvOxIRRWMXF1KVCL1bTDU4C0g90IFnDqzMWKPsg1GUN37yiXoyEaa2QPLekMYd4uJnEsO+GyDYSSOFeMZTRNdBD0FwLH1SuCYCBgfwFlzPrIM32fad3eMjDWWAM84WPMdltF9H1fRh7UizfzPfp8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774355398; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Qfam0pjAJ4JeePHqpDMBCELXhaDmkDK4IOA556Vw1hw=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=d/VZFnYAWojQft6h8RgEbOmbip4GgGD1fShHgOEGZp3D1jVpvruj0qDt0lH+1TWy/trfPnz3ycoxO+N1LEypfo2rV+xW2jzgu2Tf5WcaMiPzQBR9BjdGxNoEJAP4I+gdKHdoumIEaWvT80TZJIUd81GDpBYeF9LX5RcTclnPnQE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=2; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=nvidia.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=Nvidia.com header.i=@Nvidia.com header.b=dkUHMv2J; arc=fail smtp.client-ip=52.101.46.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=nvidia.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=Nvidia.com header.i=@Nvidia.com header.b="dkUHMv2J" ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=L9tkuNZW0jEnq2wBAWDahHq2rHGNSKqan5g5u/9XQUmpCvEpOrdGY7pa6X1f/+xh9QIZTzEyjc59K16kML1mJe+vShxPK+koozhzeVZBG2ryiNb+of+W8YjGPw0ETHPmACOC9uNgDWCR4EzGOkIiqf+q210QkmhNvjxOdyhfRXAPt9BkPBOJ3JjP3OXrz6WvGVOUeynOxwDRRV9CH7JT3SaIFwv9kkTInhKYLPtFjBDhSqr2+yB23cdEjW+XYrXcY+ArlHUu3OnaF0+dCT7OCTl1Y1QNeXgKBJZW/6RPEgaM7GtgCKz6JOMtZgJqW9ciY9h/SGSXAEcNcBZNX3Edgg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=mX38ICwQbDUekLaBrN4+CPacgxjB1vtaOcFqnzTTwOg=; b=U8uNQP2qt5q8w7iZ0Aao1TMrwx4pEKxK9s3gdDbKHQoHT0p1vRuG7eg/h1wssPryncMSuptFW+v0LxGAiSAP+VnnVuywTPs0yuhMW6HCywRpIVPF3Sx8KnGv+aKG2KmyED/riHoTuLZr29vthWlrBIyFPs743PvotmVCeV8c/z+9Z3uSetYH1cYpjue/1iZlqMfQIT46cFTXorhxs3qDgTdMOyNURFsOTY+1NxpFW4mBdMlSDZua87KefDdiSzogfQnrR7APeC5/HJmOI0MoSOb4TQLls8JcbLnTmSHEE0BZWG3Rpgeuco4uGgbK3ovAo/ZwRe4WCTn6LGXhfNdVLg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 216.228.117.160) smtp.rcpttodomain=google.com smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dmarc=pass (p=reject sp=reject pct=100) action=none header.from=nvidia.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none (0) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Nvidia.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=mX38ICwQbDUekLaBrN4+CPacgxjB1vtaOcFqnzTTwOg=; b=dkUHMv2JAjAB2hYEPbwCPW+UkzgFCAzGBzJSUpHZeYFCVPH/XOOmb+lkN5p3MQWKKdS3dFT1kW5oG/sxVq8kSy7dBTTomDvzwPrBoCdpvjsTldORrTqL4EO/OkFbrOw9UKM8d7x8ftpvWA31ROaJJmPl89Nk3TLHD08cFnbZAsaP0edDDH+zV4KkLkQX4qbfRmzAOcIwSXoKs8H4y4lXvtfd5ckyhAf+/ftrbKTxwAt1EZjrMSYbVjq1y/dB+WoCXCyAwLBXXGsqudEpxdEXVBlL+V92GXQNKtxJ5RtVJlGIeMkQjgPghcc+JOF2HEck2PPWdr1i+h2z3Y2t2uc8CQ== Received: from CH5P220CA0006.NAMP220.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10b6:610:1ef::29) by SJ1PR12MB6147.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:45a::22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.9745.20; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 12:29:49 +0000 Received: from CH2PEPF0000009B.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:610:1ef:cafe::3d) by CH5P220CA0006.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:610:1ef::29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.9723.31 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 12:29:47 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 216.228.117.160) smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nvidia.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of nvidia.com designates 216.228.117.160 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=216.228.117.160; helo=mail.nvidia.com; pr=C Received: from mail.nvidia.com (216.228.117.160) by CH2PEPF0000009B.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.167.244.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.9723.19 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 12:29:48 +0000 Received: from rnnvmail201.nvidia.com (10.129.68.8) by mail.nvidia.com (10.129.200.66) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.20; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 05:29:34 -0700 Received: from rnnvmail204.nvidia.com (10.129.68.6) by rnnvmail201.nvidia.com (10.129.68.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.20; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 05:29:34 -0700 Received: from vdi.nvidia.com (10.127.8.10) by mail.nvidia.com (10.129.68.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.2.2562.20 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 05:29:25 -0700 From: Tariq Toukan To: Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" CC: Donald Hunter , Simon Horman , Jiri Pirko , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Saeed Mahameed , "Leon Romanovsky" , Tariq Toukan , Mark Bloch , Chuck Lever , "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" , Cosmin Ratiu , "Carolina Jubran" , Daniel Zahka , "Shay Drory" , Kees Cook , Daniel Jurgens , Moshe Shemesh , Adithya Jayachandran , Willem de Bruijn , David Wei , Petr Machata , Stanislav Fomichev , Vadim Fedorenko , , , , , , Gal Pressman , Jiri Pirko Subject: [PATCH net-next V8 01/14] devlink: Update nested instance locking comment Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 14:28:35 +0200 Message-ID: <20260324122848.36731-2-tariqt@nvidia.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.44.0 In-Reply-To: <20260324122848.36731-1-tariqt@nvidia.com> References: <20260324122848.36731-1-tariqt@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-NV-OnPremToCloud: ExternallySecured X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: CH2PEPF0000009B:EE_|SJ1PR12MB6147:EE_ X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 57012da9-0149-4031-c0c1-08de89a10a77 X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;ARA:13230040|82310400026|376014|7416014|36860700016|1800799024|56012099003|18002099003|22082099003; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:216.228.117.160;CTRY:US;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:mail.nvidia.com;PTR:dc6edge1.nvidia.com;CAT:NONE;SFS:(13230040)(82310400026)(376014)(7416014)(36860700016)(1800799024)(56012099003)(18002099003)(22082099003);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0: 7kkdt6SJyhE+9YtXTGEJMGw74eEVo33J3SJ+wQl92yxMTrB8ebql74nrgA/i3ZM0/9K+KDwaQWqOIlpIy6X6xWw0udVo/NLU+aob1FgOmKkpiwJ/4OkVOMxei5CBAqxG4oEDVwao8C8d9O8EEp++TflhzvNThuV9BUPNQ7YKw6neGJSiVQR8ph7dhjngtZIA3BEKoVjnlpieDerj4snypVR8YK66EILQR6rmsaaQV6HjPs9PAjbWClCtLRY1BN00WJAW6AO8KPe2KZQnthoS3URk39tK5hZT95wQVMrvvX+TmNqPRK2D4+pZm2uy0c17XcNTNCO/Pv1NFJvwMHbfs3u8TvCM2ybo3S1NbEdIh0w7yreIzthG5TR216rydR5trC3lBe2A14Mf7dPvq+Rw1miMM5bhSA4lRBRZuQGdmMg4PRtDKkEoFNoz6xAL1WeL X-OriginatorOrg: Nvidia.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Mar 2026 12:29:48.9851 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 57012da9-0149-4031-c0c1-08de89a10a77 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a;Ip=[216.228.117.160];Helo=[mail.nvidia.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: CH2PEPF0000009B.namprd02.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SJ1PR12MB6147 From: Cosmin Ratiu In commit [1] a comment about nested instance locking was updated. But there's another place where this is mentioned, so update that as well. [1] commit 0061b5199d7c ("devlink: Reverse locking order for nested instances") Signed-off-by: Cosmin Ratiu Reviewed-by: Carolina Jubran Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan --- Documentation/networking/devlink/index.rst | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/networking/devlink/index.rst b/Documentation/networking/devlink/index.rst index f7ba7dcf477d..2087c2de5104 100644 --- a/Documentation/networking/devlink/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/networking/devlink/index.rst @@ -31,8 +31,8 @@ sure to respect following rules: - Lock ordering should be maintained. If driver needs to take instance lock of both nested and parent instances at the same time, devlink - instance lock of the parent instance should be taken first, only then - instance lock of the nested instance could be taken. + instance lock of the nested instance should be taken first, only then + instance lock of the parent instance could be taken. - Driver should use object-specific helpers to setup the nested relationship: -- 2.44.0