From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Cc: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@openvpn.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] ovpn: fix race between deleting interface and adding new peer
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 14:30:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260324143006.60e7ca2e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <acJix6cQZyqb94pA@krikkit>
On Tue, 24 Mar 2026 11:09:11 +0100 Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> -------- 8< --------
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ovpn/netlink.c b/drivers/net/ovpn/netlink.c
> index c7f382437630..ebec8c2ff427 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ovpn/netlink.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ovpn/netlink.c
> @@ -90,8 +90,11 @@ void ovpn_nl_post_doit(const struct genl_split_ops *ops, struct sk_buff *skb,
> netdevice_tracker *tracker = (netdevice_tracker *)&info->user_ptr[1];
> struct ovpn_priv *ovpn = info->user_ptr[0];
>
> - if (ovpn)
> + if (ovpn) {
> + if (READ_ONCE(dev->reg_state) >= NETREG_UNREGISTERING)
> + ovpn_peers_free(ovpn, NULL, OVPN_DEL_PEER_REASON_TEARDOWN);
> netdev_put(ovpn->dev, tracker);
> + }
> }
>
> static bool ovpn_nl_attr_sockaddr_remote(struct nlattr **attrs,
> -------- 8< --------
>
> This would clean up a peer that may have been added while we were
> starting device unregistration. We hold a reference on the device so
> no UAF possible, netdev_wait_allrefs_any will wait for this. If we
> don't have a racing peer creation, ndo_uninit takes care of the peers.
LGTM. This or change all the write paths to check if the device is still
alive after taking the lock.
> Or we can call ovpn_peers_free on every NETDEV_UNREGISTER notification
> that netdev_wait_allrefs_any sends us (but then we don't need it in
> ndo_uninit).
Hm, wouldn't we need a notification _after_ netdev_wait_allrefs_any() ?
> And s/cancel_delayed_work_sync/disable_delayed_work_sync/ for the
> keepalive_work.
>
>
> LLM claims it's because of parallel_ops, I don't think this is
> related? It also claims this issue is only for UDP sockets (and TCP
> would see a UAF on the keepalive), but ovpn_peer_new always holds the
> ovpn netdev, so I don't think there's a difference there.
Yup, I think the LLMs are trying to be helpful and are looking for some
write lock earlier in the path. As much as they are annoying I can't
blame them here, I feel like we try to make things lockless too often.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-24 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-20 10:03 [PATCH net 0/1] pull request: fixes for ovpn 2026-03-20 Antonio Quartulli
2026-03-20 10:03 ` [PATCH net 1/1] ovpn: fix race between deleting interface and adding new peer Antonio Quartulli
2026-03-24 1:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-24 1:45 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-24 10:09 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-03-24 21:30 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-03-24 22:40 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-03-25 13:37 ` Antonio Quartulli
2026-03-26 9:13 ` Sabrina Dubroca
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260324143006.60e7ca2e@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=antonio@openvpn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=imv4bel@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox