From: luka.gejak@linux.dev
To: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: horms@kernel.org, fmaurer@redhat.com, liuhangbin@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v1 7/7] net: hsr: use BIT() macro for bit shift constant
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 15:46:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260324144630.189094-8-luka.gejak@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260324144630.189094-1-luka.gejak@linux.dev>
From: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
Replace the explicit bit shift (1 << HSR_SEQ_BLOCK_SHIFT) with the
standardized BIT() macro for defining HSR_SEQ_BLOCK_SIZE. This improves
readability and aligns with kernel coding conventions.
Signed-off-by: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
---
net/hsr/hsr_framereg.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/hsr/hsr_framereg.h b/net/hsr/hsr_framereg.h
index c65ecb925734..cb731ee0ce5c 100644
--- a/net/hsr/hsr_framereg.h
+++ b/net/hsr/hsr_framereg.h
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ struct hsr_seq_block *hsr_get_seq_block(struct hsr_node *node, u16 block_idx);
#endif
#define HSR_SEQ_BLOCK_SHIFT 7 /* 128 bits */
-#define HSR_SEQ_BLOCK_SIZE (1 << HSR_SEQ_BLOCK_SHIFT)
+#define HSR_SEQ_BLOCK_SIZE BIT(HSR_SEQ_BLOCK_SHIFT)
#define HSR_SEQ_BLOCK_MASK (HSR_SEQ_BLOCK_SIZE - 1)
#define HSR_MAX_SEQ_BLOCKS 64
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-24 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-24 14:46 [PATCH net-next v1 0/7] net: hsr: subsystem cleanups and modernization luka.gejak
2026-03-24 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next v1 1/7] net: hsr: constify hsr_ops and prp_ops protocol operation structures luka.gejak
2026-03-24 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next v1 2/7] net: hsr: replace fallthrough comments with fallthrough macro luka.gejak
2026-03-26 13:34 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-26 16:25 ` Felix Maurer
2026-03-26 21:31 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-26 22:16 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-24 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next v1 3/7] net: hsr: remove unnecessary void function return statement luka.gejak
2026-03-24 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next v1 4/7] net: hsr: use __func__ instead of hardcoded function name luka.gejak
2026-03-24 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next v1 5/7] net: hsr: remove unnecessary braces for single statement block luka.gejak
2026-03-24 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next v1 6/7] net: hsr: add missing blank lines after function declarations luka.gejak
2026-03-24 14:46 ` luka.gejak [this message]
2026-03-26 16:26 ` [PATCH net-next v1 7/7] net: hsr: use BIT() macro for bit shift constant Felix Maurer
2026-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH net-next v1 0/7] net: hsr: subsystem cleanups and modernization Felix Maurer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260324144630.189094-8-luka.gejak@linux.dev \
--to=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fmaurer@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox