From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
paul.greenwalt@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v2] ice: update ice_link_mode_str_high() with 200G
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 18:13:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260324181337.264904-2-horms@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260323085840.3272274-1-aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
For local reproduction steps see https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html
---
ice: update ice_link_mode_str_high() with 200G
This patch updates ice_link_mode_str_high() to add strings for 200G PHY
types supported by E825C hardware. It also adds three new PHY type bit
definitions for indices 13-15 and increases ICE_PHY_TYPE_HIGH_MAX_INDEX
from 12 to 15.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_adminq_cmd.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_adminq_cmd.h
> index 859e9c66f3e7..f64d2efdc478 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_adminq_cmd.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_adminq_cmd.h
> @@ -1044,7 +1044,10 @@ struct ice_aqc_get_phy_caps {
> #define ICE_PHY_TYPE_HIGH_200G_KR4_PAM4 BIT_ULL(10)
> #define ICE_PHY_TYPE_HIGH_200G_AUI4_AOC_ACC BIT_ULL(11)
> #define ICE_PHY_TYPE_HIGH_200G_AUI4 BIT_ULL(12)
> -#define ICE_PHY_TYPE_HIGH_MAX_INDEX 12
> +#define ICE_PHY_TYPE_HIGH_200G_AUI8_AOC_ACC BIT_ULL(13)
> +#define ICE_PHY_TYPE_HIGH_200G_AUI8 BIT_ULL(14)
> +#define ICE_PHY_TYPE_HIGH_400GBASE_FR8 BIT_ULL(15)
> +#define ICE_PHY_TYPE_HIGH_MAX_INDEX 15
The new PHY types added here (bits 13-15) will now be iterated by
ice_update_phy_type() when it loops from 0 to ICE_PHY_TYPE_HIGH_MAX_INDEX,
calling ice_get_link_speed_based_on_phy_type() for each index. However,
does ice_get_link_speed_based_on_phy_type() have cases for these three new
PHY types?
Looking at ice_get_link_speed_based_on_phy_type() in ice_common.c, the
switch statement has cases for 200G PHY types like ICE_PHY_TYPE_HIGH_200G_CR4_PAM4
through ICE_PHY_TYPE_HIGH_200G_AUI4 (indices 5-12) that return ICE_AQ_LINK_SPEED_200GB.
But the three newly added PHY types aren't present:
- ICE_PHY_TYPE_HIGH_200G_AUI8_AOC_ACC (bit 13)
- ICE_PHY_TYPE_HIGH_200G_AUI8 (bit 14)
- ICE_PHY_TYPE_HIGH_400GBASE_FR8 (bit 15)
Without these cases, won't they fall through to the default case and return
ICE_AQ_LINK_SPEED_UNKNOWN? The first two appear to be 200G types based on
their naming, so shouldn't they be added to the switch statement to return
ICE_AQ_LINK_SPEED_200GB?
For ICE_PHY_TYPE_HIGH_400GBASE_FR8, is there an ICE_AQ_LINK_SPEED_400GB
constant defined? Looking at ice_adminq_cmd.h, the link speed constants go
from ICE_AQ_LINK_SPEED_200GB (BIT(11)) directly to ICE_AQ_LINK_SPEED_UNKNOWN
(BIT(15)). Without an ICE_AQ_LINK_SPEED_400GB constant, how should the 400G
PHY type be mapped?
This appears to leave the new PHY types non-functional for speed
determination, even though the commit message states they are needed for
E825C hardware support.
>
> struct ice_aqc_get_phy_caps_data {
> __le64 phy_type_low; /* Use values from ICE_PHY_TYPE_LOW_* */
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_common.c
> index ce11fea122d0..7cdd6a043d86 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_common.c
> @@ -84,6 +84,17 @@ static const char * const ice_link_mode_str_high[] = {
> [2] = "100G_CAUI2",
> [3] = "100G_AUI2_AOC_ACC",
> [4] = "100G_AUI2",
> + [5] = "200G_CR4_PAM4",
> + [6] = "200G_SR4",
> + [7] = "200G_FR4",
> + [8] = "200G_LR4",
> + [9] = "200G_DR4",
> + [10] = "200G_KR4_PAM4",
> + [11] = "200G_AUI4_AOC_ACC",
> + [12] = "200G_AUI4",
> + [13] = "200G_AUI8_AOC_ACC",
> + [14] = "200G_AUI8",
> + [15] = "400GBASE_FR8",
> };
>
> /**
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-24 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-23 8:58 [PATCH iwl-next v2] ice: update ice_link_mode_str_high() with 200G Aleksandr Loktionov
2026-03-23 9:10 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Paul Menzel
2026-03-24 18:13 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2026-03-24 18:16 ` Simon Horman
2026-03-25 7:01 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260324181337.264904-2-horms@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.greenwalt@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox