From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
David Kaplan <david.kaplan@amd.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>,
Tao Zhang <tao1.zhang@intel.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 07/10] x86/vmscape: Use static_call() for predictor flush
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 21:00:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260324200026.GCacLtWmhGVOmz832E@fat_crate.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260320182308.ahynqzuswlv34wf6@desk>
On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 11:23:08AM -0700, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> I am curious, what problems do you anticipate? There are nearly 50
What's easier when you need to change the underlying implementation: unexport
the static key and touch a bunch of places in the process or simply change the
accessor's body and all the callers don't notice a thing?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-24 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-19 15:40 [PATCH v7 00/10] VMSCAPE optimization for BHI variant Pawan Gupta
2026-03-19 15:40 ` [PATCH v7 01/10] x86/bhi: x86/vmscape: Move LFENCE out of clear_bhb_loop() Pawan Gupta
2026-03-19 15:40 ` [PATCH v7 02/10] x86/bhi: Make clear_bhb_loop() effective on newer CPUs Pawan Gupta
2026-03-19 15:40 ` [PATCH v7 03/10] x86/bhi: Rename clear_bhb_loop() to clear_bhb_loop_nofence() Pawan Gupta
2026-03-23 14:44 ` Nikolay Borisov
2026-03-23 17:07 ` Pawan Gupta
2026-03-19 15:41 ` [PATCH v7 04/10] x86/vmscape: Rename x86_ibpb_exit_to_user to x86_predictor_flush_exit_to_user Pawan Gupta
2026-03-19 15:41 ` [PATCH v7 05/10] x86/vmscape: Move mitigation selection to a switch() Pawan Gupta
2026-03-19 15:41 ` [PATCH v7 06/10] x86/vmscape: Use write_ibpb() instead of indirect_branch_prediction_barrier() Pawan Gupta
2026-03-19 15:41 ` [PATCH v7 07/10] x86/vmscape: Use static_call() for predictor flush Pawan Gupta
2026-03-19 16:56 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-03-19 18:05 ` Pawan Gupta
2026-03-19 20:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-19 21:34 ` Pawan Gupta
2026-03-19 21:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-19 22:06 ` Pawan Gupta
2026-03-20 6:22 ` Pawan Gupta
2026-03-20 9:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-20 11:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-03-20 18:23 ` Pawan Gupta
2026-03-24 20:00 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2026-03-24 20:14 ` Pawan Gupta
2026-03-19 15:42 ` [PATCH v7 08/10] x86/vmscape: Deploy BHB clearing mitigation Pawan Gupta
2026-03-19 15:42 ` [PATCH v7 09/10] x86/vmscape: Fix conflicting attack-vector controls with =force Pawan Gupta
2026-03-19 15:42 ` [PATCH v7 10/10] x86/vmscape: Add cmdline vmscape=on to override attack vector controls Pawan Gupta
2026-03-19 16:40 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-03-19 17:57 ` Pawan Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260324200026.GCacLtWmhGVOmz832E@fat_crate.local \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.kaplan@amd.com \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tao1.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox