public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Jay Cornwall <Jay.Cornwall@amd.com>,
	Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Schmidt <alexs@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 1/2] PCI: AtomicOps: Do not enable without support in root complex
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 16:16:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260325-fix_pciatops-v6-1-10bf19d76dd1@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260325-fix_pciatops-v6-0-10bf19d76dd1@linux.ibm.com>

When inspecting the config space of a Connect-X physical function in an
s390 system after it was initialized by the mlx5_core device driver, we
found the function to be enabled to request AtomicOps despite the
system's root-complex lacking support for completing them:

1ed0:00:00.1 Ethernet controller: Mellanox Technologies MT2894 Family [ConnectX-6 Lx]
	Subsystem: Mellanox Technologies Device 0002
  [...]
	DevCtl2: Completion Timeout: 50us to 50ms, TimeoutDis-
		 AtomicOpsCtl: ReqEn+
		 IDOReq- IDOCompl- LTR- EmergencyPowerReductionReq-
		 10BitTagReq- OBFF Disabled, EETLPPrefixBlk-

Turns out the device driver calls pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root() which
defaulted to enable AtomicOps requests even if it had no information
about the root-port that the PCIe device is attached to. Similarly,
AtomicOps requests are enabled for root complex integrated endpoints
(RCiEPs) unconditionally.

Change the logic of pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root() to fully traverse the
PCIe tree upwards, check that the bridge devices support delivering
AtomicOps transactions, and finally check that there is a root port at
the end that does support completing AtomicOps - or that the support for
completing AtomicOps at the root complex is announced through some other
arch specific way.

Introduce a new pcibios_connects_to_atomicops_capable_rc() function to
implement the check - and default to always "true". This leaves the
semantics for today's RCiEPs intact. Pass in the device in question and
the requested capabilities for future expansions.
For s390, override pcibios_connects_to_atomicops_capable_rc() to
always return "false".

Do not change the enablement of AtomicOps requests if there is no
positive confirmation that the root complex can complete PCIe AtomicOps.

Reported-by: Alexander Schmidt <alexs@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 430a23689dea ("PCI: Add pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root()")
Signed-off-by: Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/pci/pci.c |  5 +++++
 drivers/pci/pci.c   | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 include/linux/pci.h |  1 +
 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
index 2a430722cbe415dd56c92fed2e513e524f46481a..a0bef77082a153a258fbe4abb1070b22e020888e 100644
--- a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
+++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
@@ -265,6 +265,11 @@ static int zpci_cfg_store(struct zpci_dev *zdev, int offset, u32 val, u8 len)
 	return rc;
 }
 
+bool pcibios_connects_to_atomicops_capable_rc(struct pci_dev *dev, u32 cap_mask)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+
 resource_size_t pcibios_align_resource(void *data, const struct resource *res,
 				       resource_size_t size,
 				       resource_size_t align)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index 8479c2e1f74f1044416281aba11bf071ea89488a..006aa589926cb290de43f152100ddaf9961407d1 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -3660,6 +3660,19 @@ void pci_acs_init(struct pci_dev *dev)
 	pci_disable_broken_acs_cap(dev);
 }
 
+static bool pci_is_atomicops_capable_rp(struct pci_dev *dev, u32 cap, u32 cap_mask)
+{
+	if (!dev || !(pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT))
+		return false;
+
+	return (cap & cap_mask) == cap_mask;
+}
+
+bool __weak pcibios_connects_to_atomicops_capable_rc(struct pci_dev *dev, u32 cap_mask)
+{
+	return true;
+}
+
 /**
  * pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root - enable AtomicOp requests to root port
  * @dev: the PCI device
@@ -3676,8 +3689,9 @@ void pci_acs_init(struct pci_dev *dev)
 int pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root(struct pci_dev *dev, u32 cap_mask)
 {
 	struct pci_bus *bus = dev->bus;
-	struct pci_dev *bridge;
-	u32 cap, ctl2;
+	struct pci_dev *bridge = NULL;
+	u32 cap = 0;
+	u32 ctl2;
 
 	/*
 	 * Per PCIe r5.0, sec 9.3.5.10, the AtomicOp Requester Enable bit
@@ -3714,29 +3728,29 @@ int pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root(struct pci_dev *dev, u32 cap_mask)
 		switch (pci_pcie_type(bridge)) {
 		/* Ensure switch ports support AtomicOp routing */
 		case PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM:
-		case PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM:
-			if (!(cap & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_ATOMIC_ROUTE))
-				return -EINVAL;
-			break;
-
-		/* Ensure root port supports all the sizes we care about */
-		case PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT:
-			if ((cap & cap_mask) != cap_mask)
-				return -EINVAL;
-			break;
-		}
-
-		/* Ensure upstream ports don't block AtomicOps on egress */
-		if (pci_pcie_type(bridge) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM) {
+			/* Upstream ports must not block AtomicOps on egress */
 			pcie_capability_read_dword(bridge, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2,
 						   &ctl2);
 			if (ctl2 & PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_ATOMIC_EGRESS_BLOCK)
 				return -EINVAL;
+			fallthrough;
+		/* All switch ports need to route AtomicOps */
+		case PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM:
+			if (!(cap & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_ATOMIC_ROUTE))
+				return -EINVAL;
+			break;
 		}
-
 		bus = bus->parent;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Finally, last bridge must be root port and support requested sizes
+	 * or firmware asserts support
+	 */
+	if (!(pci_is_atomicops_capable_rp(bridge, cap, cap_mask) ||
+	      pcibios_connects_to_atomicops_capable_rc(dev, cap_mask)))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	pcie_capability_set_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2,
 				 PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_ATOMIC_REQ);
 	return 0;
diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
index 1c270f1d512301de4d462fe7e5097c32af5c6f8d..ef90604c39859ea8e61e5392d0bdaa1b0e43874b 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci.h
@@ -692,6 +692,7 @@ void pci_set_host_bridge_release(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge,
 				 void *release_data);
 
 int pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge);
+bool pcibios_connects_to_atomicops_capable_rc(struct pci_dev *dev, u32 cap_mask);
 
 #define PCI_REGION_FLAG_MASK	0x0fU	/* These bits of resource flags tell us the PCI region flags */
 

-- 
2.51.0


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-25 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-25 15:16 [PATCH v6 0/2] PCI: AtomicOps: Fix pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root() Gerd Bayer
2026-03-25 15:16 ` Gerd Bayer [this message]
2026-03-25 20:08   ` [PATCH v6 1/2] PCI: AtomicOps: Do not enable without support in root complex Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-26  9:51     ` Gerd Bayer
2026-03-26 16:40       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-25 15:16 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] PCI: AtomicOps: Update references to PCIe spec Gerd Bayer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260325-fix_pciatops-v6-1-10bf19d76dd1@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
    --cc=Jay.Cornwall@amd.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alexs@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox