From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Chih Kai Hsu <hsu.chih.kai@realtek.com>
Cc: nic_swsd <nic_swsd@realtek.com>,
"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"bjorn@mork.no" <bjorn@mork.no>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] r8152: add helper functions for PLA/USB OCP registers
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 16:44:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260325164424.GG111839@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9be8e74588604d9d9f5c10d33c6881e3@realtek.com>
On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 03:35:24AM +0000, Chih Kai Hsu wrote:
> On 25/03/26 2:06 am, Simon Horman wrote:
> >
> > This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this email has
> > considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
> >
> > For local reproduction steps see https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html
> > ---
> > r8152: add helper functions for PLA/USB OCP registers
> >
> > This commit introduces new helper functions (ocp_dword_w0w1,
> > ocp_word_w0w1, ocp_byte_w0w1, and their _clr_bits/_set_bits variants) to
> > simplify bitwise operations on PLA/USB OCP registers throughout the
> > r8152 driver.
> >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c index
> > > 3b6d4252d34c..ba6dc4dbfd80 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
> >
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > > @@ -3875,35 +3873,30 @@ static void r8153c_ups_en(struct r8152 *tp,
> > > bool enable)
> > >
> > > static void r8156_ups_en(struct r8152 *tp, bool enable) {
> > > - u32 ocp_data = ocp_read_byte(tp, MCU_TYPE_USB,
> > USB_POWER_CUT);
> > > -
> > > if (enable) {
> > > r8156_ups_flags(tp);
> > >
> > > - ocp_data |= UPS_EN | USP_PREWAKE | PHASE2_EN;
> > > - ocp_write_byte(tp, MCU_TYPE_USB, USB_POWER_CUT,
> > ocp_data);
> > > + ocp_byte_set_bits(tp, MCU_TYPE_USB, USB_POWER_CUT,
> > > + UPS_EN | USP_PREWAKE |
> > PHASE2_EN);
> > >
> > > - ocp_data = ocp_read_byte(tp, MCU_TYPE_USB,
> > USB_MISC_2);
> > > - ocp_data |= UPS_FORCE_PWR_DOWN;
> > > - ocp_write_byte(tp, MCU_TYPE_USB, USB_MISC_2,
> > ocp_data);
> > > + ocp_byte_set_bits(tp, MCU_TYPE_USB, USB_MISC_2,
> > > + UPS_FORCE_PWR_DOWN);
> > >
> > > switch (tp->version) {
> > > case RTL_VER_13:
> > > case RTL_VER_15:
> > > - ocp_data = ocp_read_word(tp, MCU_TYPE_USB,
> > USB_UPHY_XTAL);
> > > - ocp_data &= ~OOBS_POLLING;
> > > - ocp_write_byte(tp, MCU_TYPE_USB,
> > USB_UPHY_XTAL, ocp_data);
> > > + ocp_word_clr_bits(tp, MCU_TYPE_USB,
> > USB_UPHY_XTAL,
> > > + OOBS_POLLING);
> > ^^^^
> >
> > Does this actually change the hardware behavior for RTL_VER_13 and
> > RTL_VER_15?
> >
> > The old code read a 16-bit word with ocp_read_word() to get OOBS_POLLING
> > (BIT(8)), then cleared BIT(8) in the local variable, but wrote it back using
> > ocp_write_byte(). Since ocp_write_byte() masks the data with 0xff, the write
> > operation would only touch the low 8 bits and never actually clear BIT(8) in
> > the hardware register. This made the old code effectively a no-op for clearing
> > OOBS_POLLING.
> >
> > The new code uses ocp_word_clr_bits() which calls ocp_word_w0w1(), and
> > that performs a proper 16-bit read-modify-write cycle with ocp_write_word().
> > This means BIT(8) will now actually be cleared in the hardware.
> >
> The OOBS_POLLING (BIT(8)) must be cleared in the USB_UPHY_XTAL register.
> The old code using ocp_write_byte() is wrong.
I expect the best way forward here is to submit a fix for (only) that
problem to net-next.
>
> > While this looks like it fixes a latent bug where OOBS_POLLING was never
> > being cleared, the commit message describes this as pure refactoring to
> > simplify the code with no mention of a behavioral change.
> >
> I will mention this fix in the v4 commit message.
>
> Thanks for your review.
>
> Best Regards,
> Chih-Kai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-25 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-23 8:22 [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] r8152: add helper functions for PLA/USB/PHY OCP registers Chih Kai Hsu
2026-03-23 8:22 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] r8152: add helper functions for PLA/USB " Chih Kai Hsu
2026-03-24 6:04 ` Hayes Wang
2026-03-25 3:00 ` Chih Kai Hsu
2026-03-24 18:05 ` Simon Horman
2026-03-25 3:35 ` Chih Kai Hsu
2026-03-25 16:44 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2026-03-23 8:22 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] r8152: add helper functions for PHY " Chih Kai Hsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260325164424.GG111839@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn@mork.no \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hsu.chih.kai@realtek.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nic_swsd@realtek.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox