From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@intel.com,
stfomichev@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, larysa.zaremba@intel.com,
aleksander.lobakin@intel.com, bjorn@kernel.org,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 net 00/11] xsk: tailroom reservation and MTU validation
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 12:49:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260326114919.519456-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> (raw)
v3->v4:
- allow exact 128 bytes of space when user defined headroom is deducted
from total frame size
- provide a routine for reading procfs entries within xskxceiver
* use it to fetch cache line size and calculate skb_shared_info size
on our own
- clean up gve and igc xsk pool enablement routines
- include mtu vs frame size * max zc segments validation in
xp_assign_dev()
v2->v3:
- add tags from Bjorn/Stan
- provide at least 128 bytes instead ETH_ZLEN when validating frame
headroom
* this way we can get rid of i40e/ice changes
* make sure xsk_pool_get_rx_frame_size() returns value 128b-aligned
* and remove pre-check from idpf
- separate XDP_UMEM_SG_FLAG fixes from MTU validation in xsk_bind()
- make drop_idx a local variable in xsk's xdp drop prog
- adjust rx_dropped to new 128b related values
- move ugly placed define (Bjorn)
- remove READ_ONCE when fetching netdev->mtu (Bjorn)
v1->v2:
- remove xsk_pool_get_tailroom() definition for !CONFIG_XDP_SOCKETS
(Stan)
- do not rely on pool->umem->zc when configuring tailroom (Stan, Bjorn)
- simplify dbuff setting in ZC drivers (Bjorn)
- use defines for {head,tail}room in tests (Bjorn)
- return EINVAL instead of EOPNOTSUPP when mtu setting is wrong (Bjorn)
- include vlan headers and fcs length when validating mtu (Olek)
- tighten umem headroom validation when registering umem (Sashiko AI)
- set XDP_USE_SG in xp_assign_dev_shared() (Sashiko AI)
- adjust rx dropped xskxceiver test
Hi,
here we fix a long-standing issue regarding multi-buffer scenario in ZC
mode - we have not been providing space at the end of the buffer where
multi-buffer XDP works on skb_shared_info. This has been brought to our
attention via [0].
Unaligned mode does not get any specific treatment, it is user's
responsibility to properly handle XSK addresses in queues.
With adjustments included here in this set against xskxceiver I have
been able to pass the full test suite on ice.
Thanks,
Maciej
[0]: https://community.intel.com/t5/Ethernet-Products/X710-XDP-Packet-Corruption-Issue-DRV-MODE-Zero-Copy-Multi-Buffer/m-p/1724208
Maciej Fijalkowski (11):
xsk: tighten UMEM headroom validation to account for tailroom and min
frame
xsk: respect tailroom for ZC setups
xsk: fix XDP_UMEM_SG_FLAG issues
xsk: validate MTU against usable frame size on bind
selftests: bpf: introduce a common routine for reading procfs
selftests: bpf: fix pkt grow tests
selftests: bpf: have a separate variable for drop test
selftests: bpf: adjust rx_dropped xskxceiver's test to respect
tailroom
idpf: remove xsk frame size check against alignment
igc: remove home-grown xsk's frame size validation
gve: remove home-grown xsk's frame size validation
drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_main.c | 5 --
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/xsk.c | 10 ----
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_xdp.c | 11 ----
include/net/xdp_sock.h | 2 +-
include/net/xdp_sock_drv.h | 17 +++++-
net/xdp/xdp_umem.c | 3 +-
net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c | 11 +++-
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c | 55 +++++++++----------
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.h | 2 +
.../selftests/bpf/progs/xsk_xdp_progs.c | 4 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c | 44 +++++++++++++++
11 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-03-26 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-26 11:49 Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2026-03-26 11:49 ` [PATCH v4 net 01/11] xsk: tighten UMEM headroom validation to account for tailroom and min frame Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-26 11:49 ` [PATCH v4 net 02/11] xsk: respect tailroom for ZC setups Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-26 11:49 ` [PATCH v4 net 03/11] xsk: fix XDP_UMEM_SG_FLAG issues Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-26 18:13 ` Björn Töpel
2026-03-26 11:49 ` [PATCH v4 net 04/11] xsk: validate MTU against usable frame size on bind Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-26 18:18 ` Björn Töpel
2026-03-26 11:49 ` [PATCH v4 net 05/11] selftests: bpf: introduce a common routine for reading procfs Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-26 11:49 ` [PATCH v4 net 06/11] selftests: bpf: fix pkt grow tests Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-26 11:49 ` [PATCH v4 net 07/11] selftests: bpf: have a separate variable for drop test Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-26 11:49 ` [PATCH v4 net 08/11] selftests: bpf: adjust rx_dropped xskxceiver's test to respect tailroom Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-26 11:49 ` [PATCH v4 net 09/11] idpf: remove xsk frame size check against alignment Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-26 11:49 ` [PATCH v4 net 10/11] igc: remove home-grown xsk's frame size validation Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-26 11:49 ` [PATCH v4 net 11/11] gve: " Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-26 23:04 ` Joshua Washington
2026-03-26 18:22 ` [PATCH v4 net 00/11] xsk: tailroom reservation and MTU validation Björn Töpel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260326114919.519456-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=larysa.zaremba@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stfomichev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox