From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@intel.com,
stfomichev@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, larysa.zaremba@intel.com,
aleksander.lobakin@intel.com, bjorn@kernel.org,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 net 08/11] selftests: bpf: adjust rx_dropped xskxceiver's test to respect tailroom
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 12:49:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260326114919.519456-9-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260326114919.519456-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Since we have changed how big user defined headroom in umem can be,
change the logic in testapp_stats_rx_dropped() so we pass updated
headroom validation in xdp_umem_reg() and still drop half of frames.
Test works on non-mbuf setup so xsk_pool_get_rx_frame_size() that is
called on xsk_rcv_check() will not account skb_shared_info size. Taking
the tailroom size into account in test being fixed is needed as
xdp_umem_reg() defaults to respect it.
Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c
index ee60bcc22ee4..a96ca4b39d1e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c
@@ -1959,15 +1959,17 @@ int testapp_headroom(struct test_spec *test)
int testapp_stats_rx_dropped(struct test_spec *test)
{
+ u32 umem_tr = test->ifobj_tx->umem_tailroom;
+
if (test->mode == TEST_MODE_ZC) {
ksft_print_msg("Can not run RX_DROPPED test for ZC mode\n");
return TEST_SKIP;
}
- if (pkt_stream_replace_half(test, MIN_PKT_SIZE * 4, 0))
+ if (pkt_stream_replace_half(test, (MIN_PKT_SIZE * 2) + umem_tr, 0))
return TEST_FAILURE;
test->ifobj_rx->umem->frame_headroom = test->ifobj_rx->umem->frame_size -
- XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM - MIN_PKT_SIZE * 3;
+ XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM - (MIN_PKT_SIZE * 2) - umem_tr - 1;
if (pkt_stream_receive_half(test))
return TEST_FAILURE;
test->ifobj_rx->validation_func = validate_rx_dropped;
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-26 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-26 11:49 [PATCH v4 net 00/11] xsk: tailroom reservation and MTU validation Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-26 11:49 ` [PATCH v4 net 01/11] xsk: tighten UMEM headroom validation to account for tailroom and min frame Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-26 11:49 ` [PATCH v4 net 02/11] xsk: respect tailroom for ZC setups Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-26 11:49 ` [PATCH v4 net 03/11] xsk: fix XDP_UMEM_SG_FLAG issues Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-26 18:13 ` Björn Töpel
2026-03-26 11:49 ` [PATCH v4 net 04/11] xsk: validate MTU against usable frame size on bind Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-26 18:18 ` Björn Töpel
2026-03-26 11:49 ` [PATCH v4 net 05/11] selftests: bpf: introduce a common routine for reading procfs Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-26 11:49 ` [PATCH v4 net 06/11] selftests: bpf: fix pkt grow tests Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-26 11:49 ` [PATCH v4 net 07/11] selftests: bpf: have a separate variable for drop test Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-26 11:49 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2026-03-26 11:49 ` [PATCH v4 net 09/11] idpf: remove xsk frame size check against alignment Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-26 11:49 ` [PATCH v4 net 10/11] igc: remove home-grown xsk's frame size validation Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-26 11:49 ` [PATCH v4 net 11/11] gve: " Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-03-26 23:04 ` Joshua Washington
2026-03-26 18:22 ` [PATCH v4 net 00/11] xsk: tailroom reservation and MTU validation Björn Töpel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260326114919.519456-9-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=larysa.zaremba@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stfomichev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox