From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Xiang Mei <xmei5@asu.edu>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux.dev,
razor@blackwall.org, idosch@nvidia.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, bestswngs@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bridge: cfm: do not reschedule TX work when interval is zero
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 11:20:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260327112056.GC567789@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260326031957.3299500-1-xmei5@asu.edu>
On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 08:19:57PM -0700, Xiang Mei wrote:
> ccm_tx_work_expired() uses interval_to_us() to convert the configured
> exp_interval enum into a microsecond delay, then passes it to
> queue_delayed_work() to schedule the next iteration. The ccm_tx_dwork
> callback re-arms the same delayed_work struct at the end of each
> invocation, forming a repeating timer.
>
> interval_to_us() returns 0 for BR_CFM_CCM_INTERVAL_NONE and any
> out-of-range enum value. When this 0 is passed to queue_delayed_work()
> as the delay, the work item fires immediately and re-arms itself with
> zero delay again, creating an infinite tight loop. Each iteration
> allocates an skb via ccm_frame_build() and queues it for transmission.
> The skbs pile up faster than the network stack can free them because the
> worker never yields the CPU, rapidly exhausting all kernel memory until
> OOM deadlock panic.
>
> Since CC config and CCM TX are independent netlink commands that can be
> issued in any order, there is no single configuration entry point where
> rejecting interval=0 would cover all cases.
>
> Fix this by checking the interval at the start of ccm_tx_work_expired()
> and stopping transmission immediately if it is zero. Set period to 0 so
> that br_cfm_cc_ccm_tx() correctly sees transmission as stopped and can
> restart it later if a valid interval is configured. This also avoids
> transmitting a CCM frame with an invalid interval value.
Hi,
I think that the principle should be that code that doesn't need
to be in the datapath shouldn't be in the datapath.
So, with that in mind, I think it would be better to set a lower bound on
exp_interval when the mep is:
a) Created. It looks like that happens in br_cfm_mep_create
b) Configured. It looks like that can be done by setting a policy on the
minimum value of IFLA_BRIDGE_CFM_CC_CONFIG_EXP_INTERVAL
>
> Fixes: a806ad8ee2aa ("bridge: cfm: Kernel space implementation of CFM. CCM frame TX added.")
> Reported-by: Weiming Shi <bestswngs@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xiang Mei <xmei5@asu.edu>
...
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-27 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-26 3:19 [PATCH net] bridge: cfm: do not reschedule TX work when interval is zero Xiang Mei
2026-03-26 3:44 ` Xiang Mei
2026-03-27 11:20 ` Simon Horman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260327112056.GC567789@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=bestswngs@gmail.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=xmei5@asu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox