From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: pvalerio@redhat.com
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com,
claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
lorenzo@kernel.org, theo.lebrun@bootlin.com, nb@tipi-net.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 5/7] net: macb: generalize tx buffer handling
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2026 12:47:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260329194748.2781504-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260323221047.2749577-6-pvalerio@redhat.com>
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
---
net: macb: generalize tx buffer handling
This commit renames the skb member in struct macb_tx_buff to ptr and
introduces an enum macb_tx_buff_type. This prepares the driver for XDP xmit
support by allowing the buffer to handle both sk_buff and xdp frames.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
> index a71d36b18170..4c5dd70f003b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
> @@ -1197,7 +1197,8 @@ static int macb_halt_tx(struct macb *bp)
> bp, TSR);
> }
>
> -static void macb_tx_unmap(struct macb *bp, struct macb_tx_buff *tx_buff, int budget)
> +static void macb_tx_unmap(struct macb *bp, struct macb_tx_buff *tx_buff,
> + int budget)
> {
[ ... ]
> - if (tx_buff->skb) {
> - napi_consume_skb(tx_buff->skb, budget);
> - tx_buff->skb = NULL;
> + if (tx_buff->ptr) {
> + napi_consume_skb(tx_buff->ptr, budget);
> + tx_buff->ptr = NULL;
> }
> }
Does the teardown path iterate over the uncompleted descriptors to call
macb_tx_unmap()?
When the interface is closed, the hardware is reset and macb_free_consistent()
frees the tx_buff array directly via kfree(queue->tx_buff).
If the teardown path does not iterate from tx_tail to tx_head, will any
packets (and future xdp frames) that are currently in the transmit ring when
the interface is brought down be permanently leaked, along with their
associated DMA mappings?
[ ... ]
> @@ -1298,7 +1299,7 @@ static void macb_tx_error_task(struct work_struct *work)
> desc = macb_tx_desc(queue, tail);
> ctrl = desc->ctrl;
> tx_buff = macb_tx_buff(queue, tail);
> - skb = tx_buff->skb;
> + skb = tx_buff->ptr;
Is the tx_error_task workqueue canceled before freeing tx_buff during device
teardown?
The macb_tx_error_task background task accesses the queue->tx_buff array and
the hardware tx_ring. During device teardown, macb_free_consistent() frees
queue->tx_buff using kfree().
If cancel_work_sync(&queue->tx_error_task) is not called in the teardown
path, could a transmit error schedule this workqueue just before the device
is brought down, causing the task to execute after the structures have been
destroyed and resulting in a use-after-free?
[ ... ]
> @@ -2365,7 +2368,8 @@ static unsigned int macb_tx_map(struct macb *bp,
> goto dma_error;
>
> /* Save info to properly release resources */
> - tx_buff->skb = NULL;
> + tx_buff->ptr = NULL;
> + tx_buff->type = MACB_TYPE_SKB;
What happens if this function receives an empty skb and fails to find any
fragments?
Looking at the rest of macb_tx_map(), if the packet has no data length, it
appears the function logs an error and returns 0:
/* Should never happen */
if (unlikely(!tx_buff)) {
netdev_err(bp->dev, "BUG! empty skb!\n");
return 0;
}
Since the caller treats 0 as success, it would skip the error path that frees
the skb. As no descriptor was actually queued and tx_head wasn't updated, will
the packet never be unmapped or freed by the completion path, causing a
permanent memory leak? Should this return a non-zero error code instead?
[ ... ]
> @@ -5283,8 +5289,9 @@ static netdev_tx_t at91ether_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> netif_stop_queue(dev);
>
> /* Store packet information (to free when Tx completed) */
> - lp->rm9200_txq[desc].skb = skb;
> + lp->rm9200_txq[desc].ptr = skb;
> lp->rm9200_txq[desc].size = skb->len;
> + lp->rm9200_txq[desc].type = MACB_TYPE_SKB;
> lp->rm9200_txq[desc].mapping = dma_map_single(&lp->pdev->dev, skb->data,
Can a DMA mapping error here cause a permanent queue hang?
If dma_mapping_error() fails just below this, the driver calls
dev_kfree_skb_any(skb) and returns NETDEV_TX_OK but leaves the queue stopped
via netif_stop_queue(dev).
Because no transmission is started, the hardware will never generate a
completion interrupt, leaving the queue permanently hung.
Additionally, ptr is left pointing to the freed memory, creating a dangling
pointer. Does this need to be cleared when the error occurs?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-29 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-23 22:10 [PATCH net-next v6 0/7] net: macb: Add XDP support and page pool integration Paolo Valerio
2026-03-23 22:10 ` [PATCH net-next v6 1/7] net: macb: move Rx buffers alloc from link up to open Paolo Valerio
2026-03-29 19:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-23 22:10 ` [PATCH net-next v6 2/7] net: macb: rename rx_skbuff into rx_buff Paolo Valerio
2026-03-29 19:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-23 22:10 ` [PATCH net-next v6 3/7] net: macb: Add page pool support handle multi-descriptor frame rx Paolo Valerio
2026-03-25 17:45 ` Simon Horman
2026-03-29 19:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-23 22:10 ` [PATCH net-next v6 4/7] net: macb: make macb_tx_skb generic Paolo Valerio
2026-03-29 19:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-23 22:10 ` [PATCH net-next v6 5/7] net: macb: generalize tx buffer handling Paolo Valerio
2026-03-29 19:47 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-03-23 22:10 ` [PATCH net-next v6 6/7] net: macb: add XDP support for gem Paolo Valerio
2026-03-24 4:57 ` Mohsin Bashir
2026-03-29 19:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-29 19:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-23 22:10 ` [PATCH net-next v6 7/7] net: macb: introduce ndo_xdp_xmit support Paolo Valerio
2026-03-29 19:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260329194748.2781504-1-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=nb@tipi-net.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pvalerio@redhat.com \
--cc=theo.lebrun@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox