From: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>
To: Carlo Szelinsky <github@szelinsky.de>
Cc: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] net: pse-pd: prevent regulator cleanup from disabling unclaimed PSE PIs
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 13:17:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260330131733.7c8e68a0@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260329161014.2908509-3-github@szelinsky.de>
On Sun, 29 Mar 2026 18:10:13 +0200
Carlo Szelinsky <github@szelinsky.de> wrote:
> When a PSE controller driver is loaded as a module, its PI regulators
> are registered before any consumer (PHY) acquires the corresponding PSE
> control via of_pse_control_get(). The regulator framework's
> regulator_late_cleanup then calls pse_pi_is_enabled(), which queries
> hardware and sees the PI is enabled. Since no consumer holds it
> (use_count == 0), regulator_late_cleanup disables it, killing PoE.
>
> Add an admin_state_synced flag to struct pse_pi that is set when a
> consumer first acquires the PSE control and syncs admin_state_enabled
> from hardware. In pse_pi_is_enabled(), report unsynchronized PIs as
> disabled so regulator_late_cleanup skips them.
>
> This preserves the existing dual-path behavior: software-tracked state
> for software-controlled power domains, and hardware queries for
> hardware-controlled domains. The admin_state_synced flag is only false
> before the first consumer acquisition, which is the exact window where
> regulator_late_cleanup could incorrectly disable the PI.
Acked-by: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>
Thank you!
--
Köry Maincent, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-30 11:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-29 16:10 [PATCH 0/3] net: pse-pd: support module-based PSE controller drivers Carlo Szelinsky
2026-03-29 16:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] net: mdio: treat PSE EPROBE_DEFER as non-fatal during PHY registration Carlo Szelinsky
2026-03-30 11:16 ` Kory Maincent
2026-03-29 16:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] net: pse-pd: prevent regulator cleanup from disabling unclaimed PSE PIs Carlo Szelinsky
2026-03-30 11:17 ` Kory Maincent [this message]
2026-03-29 16:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] net: pse-pd: add lazy PSE control resolution for modular drivers Carlo Szelinsky
2026-03-30 11:23 ` Kory Maincent
2026-03-30 11:09 ` [PATCH 0/3] net: pse-pd: support module-based PSE controller drivers Kory Maincent
2026-03-30 13:29 ` [PATCH net-next v2 " Carlo Szelinsky
2026-03-30 13:29 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net: pse-pd: prevent regulator cleanup from disabling unclaimed PSE PIs Carlo Szelinsky
2026-04-01 2:28 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-06 10:22 ` Oleksij Rempel
2026-03-30 13:29 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: pse-pd: add lazy PSE control resolution for modular drivers Carlo Szelinsky
2026-03-30 13:29 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] net: mdio: treat PSE EPROBE_DEFER as non-fatal during PHY registration Carlo Szelinsky
2026-03-30 14:11 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-04-03 13:31 ` Carlo Szelinsky
2026-04-03 13:38 ` Kory Maincent
2026-04-06 8:42 ` Oleksij Rempel
2026-04-07 9:31 ` Kory Maincent
2026-04-03 15:16 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-04-05 18:57 ` Carlo Szelinsky
2026-04-06 9:30 ` Oleksij Rempel
2026-04-06 12:22 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-04-06 14:12 ` Oleksij Rempel
2026-04-07 9:40 ` Kory Maincent
2026-04-06 12:42 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-04-06 14:43 ` Carlo Szelinsky
2026-04-06 15:21 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-04-08 21:07 ` Carlo Szelinsky
2026-04-08 21:56 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-04-09 12:30 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-04-09 13:09 ` Kory Maincent
2026-04-09 15:34 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-04-09 16:08 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2026-04-09 19:54 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-04-13 9:28 ` Kory Maincent
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260330131733.7c8e68a0@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390 \
--to=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=github@szelinsky.de \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox