From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Srujana Challa <schalla@marvell.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@lists.linux.dev" <virtualization@lists.linux.dev>,
"jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
"eperezma@redhat.com" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>,
Shiva Shankar Kommula <kshankar@marvell.com>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH net,v5] virtio_net: clamp rss_max_key_size to NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 10:48:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260331104737-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <68ca0a8c-27f9-45f1-94cc-7e3c7936181f@redhat.com>
On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 04:39:02PM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On 3/31/26 3:29 PM, Srujana Challa wrote:
> >> On 3/26/26 3:23 PM, Srujana Challa wrote:
> >>> rss_max_key_size in the virtio spec is the maximum key size supported
> >>> by the device, not a mandatory size the driver must use. Also the
> >>> value 40 is a spec minimum, not a spec maximum.
> >>>
> >>> The current code rejects RSS and can fail probe when the device
> >>> reports a larger rss_max_key_size than the driver buffer limit.
> >>> Instead, clamp the effective key length to min(device
> >>> rss_max_key_size, NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN) and keep RSS enabled.
> >>>
> >>> This keeps probe working on devices that advertise larger maximum key
> >>> sizes while respecting the netdev RSS key buffer size limit.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: 3f7d9c1964fc ("virtio_net: Add hash_key_length check")
> >>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> >>> Signed-off-by: Srujana Challa <schalla@marvell.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> v3:
> >>> - Moved RSS key validation checks to virtnet_validate.
> >>> - Add fixes: tag and CC -stable
> >>> v4:
> >>> - Use NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN instead of type_max for the maximum rss key
> >> size.
> >>> v5:
> >>> - Interpret rss_max_key_size as a maximum and clamp it to
> >> NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN.
> >>> - Do not disable RSS/HASH_REPORT when device rss_max_key_size exceeds
> >> NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN.
> >>> - Drop the separate patch that replaced the runtime check with
> >> BUILD_BUG_ON.
> >>>
> >>> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 20 +++++++++-----------
> >>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c index
> >>> 022f60728721..b241c8dbb4e1 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> >>> @@ -373,8 +373,6 @@ struct receive_queue {
> >>> struct xdp_buff **xsk_buffs;
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> -#define VIRTIO_NET_RSS_MAX_KEY_SIZE 40
> >>> -
> >>> /* Control VQ buffers: protected by the rtnl lock */ struct
> >>> control_buf {
> >>> struct virtio_net_ctrl_hdr hdr;
> >>> @@ -478,7 +476,7 @@ struct virtnet_info {
> >>>
> >>> /* Must be last as it ends in a flexible-array member. */
> >>> TRAILING_OVERLAP(struct virtio_net_rss_config_trailer, rss_trailer,
> >> hash_key_data,
> >>> - u8 rss_hash_key_data[VIRTIO_NET_RSS_MAX_KEY_SIZE];
> >>> + u8 rss_hash_key_data[NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN];
> >>> );
> >>> };
> >>> static_assert(offsetof(struct virtnet_info,
> >>> rss_trailer.hash_key_data) == @@ -6717,6 +6715,7 @@ static int
> >> virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> >>> struct virtnet_info *vi;
> >>> u16 max_queue_pairs;
> >>> int mtu = 0;
> >>> + u16 key_sz;
> >>>
> >>> /* Find if host supports multiqueue/rss virtio_net device */
> >>> max_queue_pairs = 1;
> >>> @@ -6851,14 +6850,13 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device
> >> *vdev)
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> if (vi->has_rss || vi->has_rss_hash_report) {
> >>> - vi->rss_key_size =
> >>> - virtio_cread8(vdev, offsetof(struct virtio_net_config,
> >> rss_max_key_size));
> >>> - if (vi->rss_key_size > VIRTIO_NET_RSS_MAX_KEY_SIZE) {
> >>> - dev_err(&vdev->dev, "rss_max_key_size=%u exceeds
> >> the limit %u.\n",
> >>> - vi->rss_key_size,
> >> VIRTIO_NET_RSS_MAX_KEY_SIZE);
> >>> - err = -EINVAL;
> >>> - goto free;
> >>> - }
> >>> + key_sz = virtio_cread8(vdev, offsetof(struct virtio_net_config,
> >>> +rss_max_key_size));
> >>> +
> >>> + vi->rss_key_size = min_t(u16, key_sz, NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN);
> >>> + if (key_sz > vi->rss_key_size)
> >>> + dev_warn(&vdev->dev,
> >>> + "rss_max_key_size=%u exceeds driver limit
> >> %u, clamping\n",
> >>> + key_sz, vi->rss_key_size);
> >>
> >> NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN is 256 and virtio_cread8() returns a u8. The check is
> >> not needed, and the warning will never be printed. I think that the
> >> BUILD_BUG_ON() you used in v4 would be better than the above chunk.
> >>
> > Thank you for the feedback. In net-next, NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN is 256. This fix is
> > also intended for stable kernels, where NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN is 52, and
> > I added the message to make clamping visible in that case.
> > I will remove the check and send the next version.
>
> I'm sorry, I haven't looked at the historical context when I wrote my
> previous reply.
>
> IMHO the additional check does not make sense in the current net tree.
> On the flip side stable trees will need it. I suggest:
>
> - dropping the check for the 'net' patch
> - also dropping CC: stable tag
> - explicitly sending to stable the fix variant including the size check.
>
> @Michael: WDYT?
>
> /P
I was the one who suggested it, the extra check is harmless, I'm
inclined to always have it. Less work than maintaining two patches.
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-31 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-26 14:23 [PATCH net,v5] virtio_net: clamp rss_max_key_size to NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN Srujana Challa
2026-03-31 9:20 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-03-31 13:29 ` [EXTERNAL] " Srujana Challa
2026-03-31 14:39 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-03-31 14:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2026-04-01 1:05 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-01 8:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-04-01 8:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-04-02 3:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260331104737-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kshankar@marvell.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=schalla@marvell.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox