From: Luigi Leonardi <leonardi@redhat.com>
To: "Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Stefano Garzarella" <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
"Arseniy Krasnov" <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Luigi Leonardi <leonardi@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 2/2] vsock/test: add MSG_PEEK after partial recv test
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 10:18:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260402-fix_peek-v1-2-ad274fcef77b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260402-fix_peek-v1-0-ad274fcef77b@redhat.com>
Add a test that verifies MSG_PEEK works correctly after a partial
recv().
This is to test a bug that was present in the `virtio_transport_stream_do_peek()`
when computing the number of bytes to copy: After a partial read, the
peek function didn't take into consideration the number of bytes that
were already read. So peeking the whole buffer would cause a out-of-bounds read,
that resulted in a -EFAULT.
This test does exactly this: do a partial recv on a buffer, then try to
peek the whole buffer content.
Signed-off-by: Luigi Leonardi <leonardi@redhat.com>
---
tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
index 5bd20ccd9335caafe68e8b7a5d02a4deb3d2deec..308f9f8f30d22bec5aaa282356e400d8438fe321 100644
--- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
@@ -346,6 +346,65 @@ static void test_stream_msg_peek_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
return test_msg_peek_server(opts, false);
}
+#define PEEK_AFTER_RECV_LEN 100
+
+static void test_stream_peek_after_recv_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
+{
+ unsigned char buf[PEEK_AFTER_RECV_LEN];
+ int fd;
+ int i;
+
+ fd = vsock_stream_connect(opts->peer_cid, opts->peer_port);
+ if (fd < 0) {
+ perror("connect");
+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < sizeof(buf); i++)
+ buf[i] = (unsigned char)i;
+
+ control_expectln("SRVREADY");
+
+ send_buf(fd, buf, sizeof(buf), 0, sizeof(buf));
+
+ close(fd);
+}
+
+static void test_stream_peek_after_recv_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
+{
+ unsigned char buf[PEEK_AFTER_RECV_LEN];
+ int half = PEEK_AFTER_RECV_LEN / 2;
+ ssize_t ret;
+ int fd;
+
+ fd = vsock_stream_accept(VMADDR_CID_ANY, opts->peer_port, NULL);
+ if (fd < 0) {
+ perror("accept");
+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+ }
+
+ control_writeln("SRVREADY");
+
+ /* Partial recv to advance offset within the skb */
+ recv_buf(fd, buf, half, 0, half);
+
+ /* Try to peek more than what remains: should return only 'half'
+ * bytes. Note: we can't use recv_buf() because it loops until
+ * all requested bytes are returned.
+ */
+ ret = recv(fd, buf, sizeof(buf), MSG_PEEK);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ perror("recv");
+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+ } else if (ret != half) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "MSG_PEEK after partial recv returned %d (expected %d)\n",
+ ret, half);
+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+ }
+
+ close(fd);
+}
+
#define SOCK_BUF_SIZE (2 * 1024 * 1024)
#define SOCK_BUF_SIZE_SMALL (64 * 1024)
#define MAX_MSG_PAGES 4
@@ -2520,6 +2579,11 @@ static struct test_case test_cases[] = {
.run_client = test_stream_tx_credit_bounds_client,
.run_server = test_stream_tx_credit_bounds_server,
},
+ {
+ .name = "SOCK_STREAM MSG_PEEK after partial recv",
+ .run_client = test_stream_peek_after_recv_client,
+ .run_server = test_stream_peek_after_recv_server,
+ },
{},
};
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-02 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-02 8:18 [PATCH net 0/2] vsock/virtio: fix MSG_PEEK calculation on bytes to copy Luigi Leonardi
2026-04-02 8:18 ` [PATCH net 1/2] vsock/virtio: fix MSG_PEEK ignoring skb offset when calculating " Luigi Leonardi
2026-04-02 13:08 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-04-05 19:22 ` Arseniy Krasnov
2026-04-02 8:18 ` Luigi Leonardi [this message]
2026-04-02 13:28 ` [PATCH net 2/2] vsock/test: add MSG_PEEK after partial recv test Stefano Garzarella
2026-04-03 11:40 ` Luigi Leonardi
2026-04-05 19:14 ` Arseniy Krasnov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260402-fix_peek-v1-2-ad274fcef77b@redhat.com \
--to=leonardi@redhat.com \
--cc=avkrasnov@salutedevices.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox