* [PATCH iwl-net v1] igc: fix potential skb leak in igc_fpe_xmit_smd_frame()
@ 2026-03-29 14:50 Kohei Enju
2026-03-30 6:32 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-04-03 14:05 ` Simon Horman
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kohei Enju @ 2026-03-29 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-wired-lan, netdev
Cc: Tony Nguyen, Przemek Kitszel, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller,
Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Faizal Rahim,
Kohei Enju
When igc_fpe_init_tx_descriptor() fails, no one takes care of an
allocated skb, leaking it. [1]
Use dev_kfree_skb_any() on failure.
Also call igc_flush_tx_descriptors() only on success.
[1]
unreferenced object 0xffff88813aee1b40 (size 224):
comm "softirq", pid 0, jiffies 4294709256
[...]
backtrace (crc dee31384):
kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof+0x54f/0x640
__alloc_skb+0xd9/0x5b0
igc_fpe_xmit_smd_frame.isra.0+0xad/0x510
igc_fpe_send_mpacket+0x32/0x80
[...]
Fixes: 5422570c0010 ("igc: add support for frame preemption verification")
Signed-off-by: Kohei Enju <kohei@enjuk.jp>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_tsn.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_tsn.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_tsn.c
index 8a110145bfee..eaa274248d54 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_tsn.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_tsn.c
@@ -109,10 +109,14 @@ static int igc_fpe_xmit_smd_frame(struct igc_adapter *adapter,
__netif_tx_lock(nq, cpu);
err = igc_fpe_init_tx_descriptor(ring, skb, type);
- igc_flush_tx_descriptors(ring);
+ if (!err)
+ igc_flush_tx_descriptors(ring);
__netif_tx_unlock(nq);
+ if (err)
+ dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
+
return err;
}
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v1] igc: fix potential skb leak in igc_fpe_xmit_smd_frame()
2026-03-29 14:50 [PATCH iwl-net v1] igc: fix potential skb leak in igc_fpe_xmit_smd_frame() Kohei Enju
@ 2026-03-30 6:32 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-04-03 14:05 ` Simon Horman
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Loktionov, Aleksandr @ 2026-03-30 6:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kohei Enju, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Nguyen, Anthony L, Kitszel, Przemyslaw, Andrew Lunn,
David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
Faizal Rahim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org> On Behalf
> Of Kohei Enju
> Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2026 4:51 PM
> To: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>; Kitszel,
> Przemyslaw <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>; Andrew Lunn
> <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>; David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>; Eric
> Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>; Paolo
> Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>; Faizal Rahim
> <faizal.abdul.rahim@linux.intel.com>; Kohei Enju <kohei@enjuk.jp>
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v1] igc: fix potential skb
> leak in igc_fpe_xmit_smd_frame()
>
> When igc_fpe_init_tx_descriptor() fails, no one takes care of an
> allocated skb, leaking it. [1]
>
> Use dev_kfree_skb_any() on failure.
> Also call igc_flush_tx_descriptors() only on success.
>
> [1]
> unreferenced object 0xffff88813aee1b40 (size 224):
> comm "softirq", pid 0, jiffies 4294709256 [...]
> backtrace (crc dee31384):
> kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof+0x54f/0x640
> __alloc_skb+0xd9/0x5b0
> igc_fpe_xmit_smd_frame.isra.0+0xad/0x510
> igc_fpe_send_mpacket+0x32/0x80
> [...]
>
> Fixes: 5422570c0010 ("igc: add support for frame preemption
> verification")
> Signed-off-by: Kohei Enju <kohei@enjuk.jp>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_tsn.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_tsn.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_tsn.c
> index 8a110145bfee..eaa274248d54 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_tsn.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_tsn.c
> @@ -109,10 +109,14 @@ static int igc_fpe_xmit_smd_frame(struct
> igc_adapter *adapter,
> __netif_tx_lock(nq, cpu);
>
> err = igc_fpe_init_tx_descriptor(ring, skb, type);
> - igc_flush_tx_descriptors(ring);
> + if (!err)
> + igc_flush_tx_descriptors(ring);
>
> __netif_tx_unlock(nq);
>
> + if (err)
> + dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> +
> return err;
> }
>
> --
> 2.51.0
I'd recommend adding reproduction steps and Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH iwl-net v1] igc: fix potential skb leak in igc_fpe_xmit_smd_frame()
2026-03-29 14:50 [PATCH iwl-net v1] igc: fix potential skb leak in igc_fpe_xmit_smd_frame() Kohei Enju
2026-03-30 6:32 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
@ 2026-04-03 14:05 ` Simon Horman
2026-04-04 11:40 ` Kohei Enju
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2026-04-03 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kohei Enju
Cc: intel-wired-lan, netdev, Tony Nguyen, Przemek Kitszel,
Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski,
Paolo Abeni, Faizal Rahim
On Sun, Mar 29, 2026 at 02:50:49PM +0000, Kohei Enju wrote:
> When igc_fpe_init_tx_descriptor() fails, no one takes care of an
> allocated skb, leaking it. [1]
>
> Use dev_kfree_skb_any() on failure.
> Also call igc_flush_tx_descriptors() only on success.
>
> [1]
> unreferenced object 0xffff88813aee1b40 (size 224):
> comm "softirq", pid 0, jiffies 4294709256
> [...]
> backtrace (crc dee31384):
> kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof+0x54f/0x640
> __alloc_skb+0xd9/0x5b0
> igc_fpe_xmit_smd_frame.isra.0+0xad/0x510
> igc_fpe_send_mpacket+0x32/0x80
> [...]
>
> Fixes: 5422570c0010 ("igc: add support for frame preemption verification")
> Signed-off-by: Kohei Enju <kohei@enjuk.jp>
I am wondering if we can achieve this while sticking to the idiom
that the main thread of execution is for the non-error flow,
while conditions handle errors.
Something like this (completely untested!):
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_tsn.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_tsn.c
index 8a110145bfee..02dd9f0290a3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_tsn.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_tsn.c
@@ -109,10 +109,16 @@ static int igc_fpe_xmit_smd_frame(struct igc_adapter *adapter,
__netif_tx_lock(nq, cpu);
err = igc_fpe_init_tx_descriptor(ring, skb, type);
- igc_flush_tx_descriptors(ring);
+ if (err)
+ goto err_free_skb_any;
+ igc_flush_tx_descriptors(ring);
__netif_tx_unlock(nq);
+ return 0;
+err_free_skb_any:
+ __netif_tx_unlock(nq);
+ dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
return err;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH iwl-net v1] igc: fix potential skb leak in igc_fpe_xmit_smd_frame()
2026-04-03 14:05 ` Simon Horman
@ 2026-04-04 11:40 ` Kohei Enju
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kohei Enju @ 2026-04-04 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Simon Horman
Cc: intel-wired-lan, netdev, Tony Nguyen, Przemek Kitszel,
Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski,
Paolo Abeni, Faizal Rahim
On 04/03 15:05, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2026 at 02:50:49PM +0000, Kohei Enju wrote:
> > When igc_fpe_init_tx_descriptor() fails, no one takes care of an
> > allocated skb, leaking it. [1]
> >
> > Use dev_kfree_skb_any() on failure.
> > Also call igc_flush_tx_descriptors() only on success.
> >
> > [1]
> > unreferenced object 0xffff88813aee1b40 (size 224):
> > comm "softirq", pid 0, jiffies 4294709256
> > [...]
> > backtrace (crc dee31384):
> > kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof+0x54f/0x640
> > __alloc_skb+0xd9/0x5b0
> > igc_fpe_xmit_smd_frame.isra.0+0xad/0x510
> > igc_fpe_send_mpacket+0x32/0x80
> > [...]
> >
> > Fixes: 5422570c0010 ("igc: add support for frame preemption verification")
> > Signed-off-by: Kohei Enju <kohei@enjuk.jp>
>
> I am wondering if we can achieve this while sticking to the idiom
> that the main thread of execution is for the non-error flow,
> while conditions handle errors.
Hi Simon-san, thank you for the suggestion.
I agree. It seems cleaner for me. I'll work on v2.
> Something like this (completely untested!):
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_tsn.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_tsn.c
> index 8a110145bfee..02dd9f0290a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_tsn.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_tsn.c
> @@ -109,10 +109,16 @@ static int igc_fpe_xmit_smd_frame(struct igc_adapter *adapter,
> __netif_tx_lock(nq, cpu);
>
> err = igc_fpe_init_tx_descriptor(ring, skb, type);
> - igc_flush_tx_descriptors(ring);
> + if (err)
> + goto err_free_skb_any;
>
> + igc_flush_tx_descriptors(ring);
> __netif_tx_unlock(nq);
> + return 0;
>
> +err_free_skb_any:
> + __netif_tx_unlock(nq);
> + dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> return err;
> }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-04-04 11:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-29 14:50 [PATCH iwl-net v1] igc: fix potential skb leak in igc_fpe_xmit_smd_frame() Kohei Enju
2026-03-30 6:32 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-04-03 14:05 ` Simon Horman
2026-04-04 11:40 ` Kohei Enju
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox