public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Emil Tantilov <emil.s.tantilov@intel.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
	aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, richardcochran@gmail.com,
	milena.olech@intel.com, jacob.e.keller@intel.com,
	konstantin.ilichev@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH iwl-net] idpf: fix read_dev_clk_lock spinlock init in idpf_ptp_init()
Date: Fri,  3 Apr 2026 08:35:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260403153538.11516-1-emil.s.tantilov@intel.com> (raw)

In idpf_ptp_init(), read_dev_clk_lock is initialized after
ptp_schedule_worker() had already been called (and after
idpf_ptp_settime64() could reach the lock). The PTP aux worker
fires immediately upon scheduling and can call into
idpf_ptp_read_src_clk_reg_direct(), which takes
spin_lock(&ptp->read_dev_clk_lock) on an uninitialized lock, triggering
the lockdep "non-static key" warning:

[12973.796587] idpf 0000:83:00.0: Device HW Reset initiated
[12974.094507] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
...
[12974.097208] Call Trace:
[12974.097213]  <TASK>
[12974.097218]  dump_stack_lvl+0x93/0xe0
[12974.097234]  register_lock_class+0x4c4/0x4e0
[12974.097249]  ? __lock_acquire+0x427/0x2290
[12974.097259]  __lock_acquire+0x98/0x2290
[12974.097272]  lock_acquire+0xc6/0x310
[12974.097281]  ? idpf_ptp_read_src_clk_reg+0xb7/0x150 [idpf]
[12974.097311]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xde/0x190
[12974.097318]  ? finish_task_switch.isra.0+0xd2/0x350
[12974.097330]  ? __pfx_ptp_aux_kworker+0x10/0x10 [ptp]
[12974.097343]  _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x40
[12974.097353]  ? idpf_ptp_read_src_clk_reg+0xb7/0x150 [idpf]
[12974.097373]  idpf_ptp_read_src_clk_reg+0xb7/0x150 [idpf]
[12974.097391]  ? kthread_worker_fn+0x88/0x3d0
[12974.097404]  ? kthread_worker_fn+0x4e/0x3d0
[12974.097411]  idpf_ptp_update_cached_phctime+0x26/0x120 [idpf]
[12974.097428]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x28/0x50
[12974.097436]  idpf_ptp_do_aux_work+0x15/0x20 [idpf]
[12974.097454]  ptp_aux_kworker+0x20/0x40 [ptp]
[12974.097464]  kthread_worker_fn+0xd5/0x3d0
[12974.097474]  ? __pfx_kthread_worker_fn+0x10/0x10
[12974.097482]  kthread+0xf4/0x130
[12974.097489]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[12974.097498]  ret_from_fork+0x32c/0x410
[12974.097512]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[12974.097519]  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[12974.097540]  </TASK>

Move the call to spin_lock_init() up a bit to make sure read_dev_clk_lock
is not touched before it's been initialized.

Fixes: 5cb8805d2366 ("idpf: negotiate PTP capabilities and get PTP clock")
Signed-off-by: Emil Tantilov <emil.s.tantilov@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Madhu Chittim <madhu.chittim@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ptp.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ptp.c
index eec91c4f0a75..4a51d2727547 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ptp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ptp.c
@@ -952,6 +952,8 @@ int idpf_ptp_init(struct idpf_adapter *adapter)
 		goto free_ptp;
 	}
 
+	spin_lock_init(&adapter->ptp->read_dev_clk_lock);
+
 	err = idpf_ptp_create_clock(adapter);
 	if (err)
 		goto free_ptp;
@@ -977,8 +979,6 @@ int idpf_ptp_init(struct idpf_adapter *adapter)
 			goto remove_clock;
 	}
 
-	spin_lock_init(&adapter->ptp->read_dev_clk_lock);
-
 	pci_dbg(adapter->pdev, "PTP init successful\n");
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.37.3


             reply	other threads:[~2026-04-03 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-03 15:35 Emil Tantilov [this message]
2026-04-03 15:36 ` [PATCH iwl-net] idpf: fix read_dev_clk_lock spinlock init in idpf_ptp_init() Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-04-07 16:02 ` Simon Horman
2026-04-07 22:00   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Tantilov, Emil S
2026-04-08 16:27     ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260403153538.11516-1-emil.s.tantilov@intel.com \
    --to=emil.s.tantilov@intel.com \
    --cc=aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ilichev@intel.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=milena.olech@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox