From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpout-03.galae.net (smtpout-03.galae.net [185.246.85.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F172269D18; Fri, 3 Apr 2026 13:38:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.85.4 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775223541; cv=none; b=bf+v7yfQfO6QlQ3y8gwEyx0fGF4bkOfXbcCtht+JstKyXkkp8oH3HNDZ/hfjbfUDjUcP63+g4lu7MD9Tq7/9SpCrw0PlC7e9UHL8BaEREkrC5vYiBxm5KmJoTTF9acgoeOgn1Z0Mfl83ODtHLyNKBibH0duUbkcxqrAjLvG2qbA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775223541; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xqFOg+GbR7epeqMzDZBUeC8YfFgZNVdj1MN+En/0iNY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=rjKz7aPnIdp0i5QvDdo/L8DxIW8PogYXrcL8ZrzwvKt3qfxBb8HuQhI2qa1layS1+2DPEh97tXWibPJeFRBNDAe1frbSLvpSdztTAH2ZCpU8KTVSmWTkWaxw/lBx1oGSTJYg2/TNh2yfGfdlwpaex7Fe6nH7d8DU/C/nt6opZSo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=egdDqpc8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.85.4 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="egdDqpc8" Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-03.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3C144E428D1; Fri, 3 Apr 2026 13:38:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EFC8603C1; Fri, 3 Apr 2026 13:38:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 7F16C104500CB; Fri, 3 Apr 2026 15:38:50 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1775223534; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=w8XFWZ9yBCRVM6hZS4oBSucSgDFxGPJcG6zp+cLyDT0=; b=egdDqpc8Ltvvz7Ev6v8503RlrgPbpVOioWDy7fd+PXEG+bj8Jr+hmLwPLPhobhuIT9Tqye m8qOIQ4J4WH1Wjd5cRIP5RpqC1mlcBdjrqyefR+XN88o2/sRVQc2ofQtzI1BDw/kd355+7 hETps/LK2i69BcoT3S/Afh+s/CdjEtMTlpe1nznhGzsOoSRqzGaRqfyNtyOz+sMQS7+f5R Jav3nhg4Dz2TSngqyUXr6McpcGAs/+Ulvkg5jd2UN/fTmtRI2D5UJ6DR+SAANTo4qg6XqY C7K8XuUaXEapwf8QL1GX2+/7k48sf44d3DQYiSmP3LLq+l4Q3T8Ya1LRqyFXUQ== Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2026 15:38:49 +0200 From: Kory Maincent To: Carlo Szelinsky Cc: Andrew Lunn , Oleksij Rempel , Andrew Lunn , Heiner Kallweit , Russell King , Jakub Kicinski , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] net: mdio: treat PSE EPROBE_DEFER as non-fatal during PHY registration Message-ID: <20260403153849.2ed7d342@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390> In-Reply-To: <20260403133111.3304497-1-github@szelinsky.de> References: <61561526-1e8c-4d0c-a0ff-56da25ee6531@lunn.ch> <20260403133111.3304497-1-github@szelinsky.de> Organization: bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.2.0 (GTK 3.24.41; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 On Fri, 3 Apr 2026 15:31:11 +0200 Carlo Szelinsky wrote: > Hi Andrew, >=20 > Thx for helping me!=20 > I thought of keeping the eager path so we still catch broken DT bindings > early at boot instead of silently failing later on first ethtool access. > But you're right, dropping it would simplify things quite a bit. Do you > think that trade-off is worth it? I will follow your lead.=20 On my side I thinks that's a good idea, and I don't see any issue with that= for now. Oleksij you introduced it here in the first place, is it ok for you? Regards, --=20 K=C3=B6ry Maincent, Bootlin Embedded Linux and kernel engineering https://bootlin.com