From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F9EA3AC0FC; Sat, 4 Apr 2026 09:51:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775296280; cv=none; b=e1Zfo2F3VuQE8LUrbMXOutYZgAJlihnw4eNj55ZWsvM6IkSGRrGupt1nWL5x8tjLwjJhjh8T9V8eVjUFP6plXsdW0Ggl7WKdjDC97IXU86iIPcte3gAWDs578cgFifGNNd4DhaiyPcYbNeRsnQlEFCgerT0D4eJx5KPI+kOBe94= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775296280; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GT2OkmpXdpsGxUqki+l9pSr2rIet+DOLg+SkmYDTcas=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=hGGa+u/7buiX4iM89leCn8tfkwV5EiriJgtBxles4wsbQKpd0iBU8UpURdP82jhe9n9fHFwnw8eJBEw2b3RHdtwIIzzDD12rAjxFIa3mVMzYKo64zdd6TmiV5EmOynZ7StIDnaW+Mq8Ur4wDjxLZ71ZbaSm5w2gzONoV6AgUsYc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=jU84Vos1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jU84Vos1" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C3D67C2BCB2; Sat, 4 Apr 2026 09:51:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1775296279; bh=GT2OkmpXdpsGxUqki+l9pSr2rIet+DOLg+SkmYDTcas=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=jU84Vos170YwL0dDyz9l3FejTLtBR88W9vbpiIkziMdItKEz/lSLygUA9a2lJ3A+g FwkjUN1oRnu7OCn2KhO9hXmIcuWAsdE1viWNrJiQyCAE4W28dJzZddYIGN3ilGRmPm AQW4onmj/ZTuyM74pqvkTS2IzLC6e7cocwijZX3H74xaMMG4pEcihX8P5LhAX5wyYQ aTJhiS9u3yuzWukaExaYQxjSZt80Om5ZFlrL/Q3oRxU1GXfg7oVUPQwEk4AJ5P2BMa ODH65S7vjDTAWfR6xYS8gYqCEZ2y949saBiinIvA3l1JzBuYA+VqY7s5t0XFB8BWCH lG9ywbrGpPEww== Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2026 10:51:15 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jamal Hadi Salim , Jiri Pirko , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Yousuk Seung , Neal Cardwell , open list Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 6/7] net/sched: netem: check for invalid slot range Message-ID: <20260404095115.GZ113102@horms.kernel.org> References: <20260402202037.176299-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20260402202037.176299-7-stephen@networkplumber.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260402202037.176299-7-stephen@networkplumber.org> On Thu, Apr 02, 2026 at 01:19:34PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Reject slot configuration where min_delay exceeds max_delay. > The delay range computation in get_slot_next() underflows in > this case, producing bogus results. > > Fixes: 0a9fe5c375b5 ("netem: slotting with non-uniform distribution") > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger Reviewed-by: Simon Horman