From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEEB270830; Tue, 7 Apr 2026 00:43:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775522606; cv=none; b=ue1fgAe3HkXp+Rmi79X8HzCn3b/OLSbl+5eKF9EQyZXYCsm04LJwLhJYjzXXm3KvUruvEBkqASoKQQGX5sJmjCLLdNxV4FueA7EDfMrvfvus5gHYqo92j/CJx1xbvs77aJL5wU2GOqjLc/DWCKr7cNCjHNzwTUSKADnQSftCLNE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775522606; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JY9IxlluVwlJCAKpBGKd5NaRfJ6onloYtkTR64nerzg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AM+qBPaEhWBAb0000soc8tjEThc/UdVAU5ohw6pyD9rQLbrE6b/FMMSH+gEpPNh9baflFq3XxGXqB1/OlBpvhQwzO20gp3TfhypLp7W83icc/JDAVwphPQuAt8xgGg+ykpgI+7awD18+D+dsNYY37Sk+4kfsixQ9FkuBFTbo9wI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=l1msI51X; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="l1msI51X" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9AAE3C4CEF7; Tue, 7 Apr 2026 00:43:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1775522605; bh=JY9IxlluVwlJCAKpBGKd5NaRfJ6onloYtkTR64nerzg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=l1msI51X7ofjKkDGEwZ7TwCpO6NGnXPJnQA1lhuTqtcWJfoR/UN5nciutx8NZY7x1 88KESoAUzgoAVxwpeh3cqmpaVWHfK1NdIkub5nMFky1HOhcMMt6VIt9oMAliFWypky Y5CbN/7UsM5Qwo2xvW+Fb0DR4qytEphv36XqoIHIgqi1EZjg/ZmORgNyNZpby3AdNp xThrScd8bMR1/Ya+pQJEubcerHYHo2slzgW/sgvVoGuZEnVRkW+0rCI/jWtDXUlaR8 76Csx3avtjyGJtd5JzmiJ/TtZo3lhSxFg+JJQrZ/BIuhFaGPJp2XXxhtMak+/6dV4J HfYV6BSzNY21w== Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2026 17:43:23 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Nicolai Buchwitz Cc: Mark Bloch , Dragos Tatulea , Tariq Toukan , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Saeed Mahameed , Leon Romanovsky , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend , Stanislav Fomichev , Cosmin Ratiu , Simon Horman , Jacob Keller , Lama Kayal , Michal Swiatkowski , Carolina Jubran , Nathan Chancellor , Daniel Zahka , Rahul Rameshbabu , Raed Salem , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Gal Pressman Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 4/5] net/mlx5e: XDP, Use a single linear page per rq Message-ID: <20260406174323.4597db58@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20260403090927.139042-1-tariqt@nvidia.com> <20260403090927.139042-5-tariqt@nvidia.com> <20260406084344.5d315f01@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 06 Apr 2026 21:13:43 +0200 Nicolai Buchwitz wrote: > On 6.4.2026 18:31, Mark Bloch wrote: > > On 06/04/2026 18:43, Jakub Kicinski wrote: =20 > >> Thanks a lot for reviewing the review! It takes a lot of maintainer=20 > >> time =20 > > =E2=80=9CBefore posting, authors could run a recommended baseline of re= view=20 > > tools, > > where available, to catch obvious issues early. During review, tools=20 > > such > > as review-prompts and Sashiko may be used to assist the reviewer.=E2=80= =9D >=20 > There is already https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html which I=20 > found really helpful. > If this is still the preferred approach, I could draft a patch to add it= =20 > to Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst Right, I'd like to have something similar and a bit of time to drive down the number of false positives from Sashiko. Compared to the NIPA's ai-reviews the Sashiko comments take a lot of time to validate and are often alarmist. The merge window starts next week so I'll have more spare cycles. Please share if you had success running Sashiko (https://sashiko.dev/) "locally"!