From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: achender@kernel.org
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
rds-devel@oss.oracle.com, edumazet@google.com,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, horms@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1 1/2] net/rds: Optimize rds_ib_laddr_check
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2026 18:19:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260407011900.3596320-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260405041613.309958-2-achender@kernel.org>
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
For local reproduction steps see https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html
---
net/rds: Optimize rds_ib_laddr_check
This patch optimizes rds_ib_laddr_check() to avoid excessive
rdma_bind_addr() calls by checking if an address has been used before.
It renames the original function to rds_ib_laddr_check_cm() and
introduces a new wrapper that first checks rds_ib_get_device() before
falling back to the CM-based check.
> diff --git a/net/rds/ib.c b/net/rds/ib.c
> index ac6affa33ce7..73e01984ee9a 100644
> --- a/net/rds/ib.c
> +++ b/net/rds/ib.c
> @@ -401,8 +401,8 @@ static void rds6_ib_ic_info(struct socket *sock, unsigned int len,
> * allowed to influence which paths have priority. We could call userspace
> * asserting this policy "routing".
> */
> -static int rds_ib_laddr_check(struct net *net, const struct in6_addr *addr,
> - __u32 scope_id)
> +static int rds_ib_laddr_check_cm(struct net *net, const struct in6_addr *addr,
> + __u32 scope_id)
> {
> int ret;
> struct rdma_cm_id *cm_id;
[ ... ]
> @@ -487,6 +487,20 @@ static int rds_ib_laddr_check(struct net *net, const struct in6_addr *addr,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int rds_ib_laddr_check(struct net *net, const struct in6_addr *addr,
> + __u32 scope_id)
> +{
> + struct rds_ib_device *rds_ibdev = rds_ib_get_device(addr->s6_addr32[3]);
> +
> + if (rds_ibdev) {
> + rds_ib_dev_put(rds_ibdev);
> +
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + return rds_ib_laddr_check_cm(net, addr, scope_id);
> +}
> +
Can this code handle pure IPv6 addresses correctly? The function extracts
addr->s6_addr32[3] and passes it to rds_ib_get_device(), which looks up
devices by IPv4 address.
For IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses, addr->s6_addr32[3] contains the IPv4
address. But for pure IPv6 addresses (when CONFIG_IPV6 is enabled),
addr->s6_addr32[3] contains the last 32 bits of the IPv6 address, which
could accidentally match a stored IPv4 address.
When this collision occurs, the function returns 0 (success) without
calling rds_ib_laddr_check_cm(), which performs the full validation
including rdma_bind_addr() and IPv6 link-local scope_id checks. This
means a pure IPv6 address could be incorrectly accepted as valid for IB
transport.
Should this be guarded with an ipv6_addr_v4mapped(addr) check? For
example:
if (ipv6_addr_v4mapped(addr)) {
rds_ibdev = rds_ib_get_device(addr->s6_addr32[3]);
...
}
The existing callers of rds_ib_get_device (rds_ib_get_mr,
rds_ib_update_ipaddr) operate in post-connection contexts where the
address type is already validated, but rds_ib_laddr_check is the
validation gate called during bind/transport-selection for any address
type.
> static void rds_ib_unregister_client(void)
> {
> ib_unregister_client(&rds_ib_client);
[ ... ]
--
pw-bot: cr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-07 1:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-05 4:16 [PATCH net v1 0/2] net/rds: Fix use-after-free in RDS/IB for non-init namespaces Allison Henderson
2026-04-05 4:16 ` [PATCH net v1 1/2] net/rds: Optimize rds_ib_laddr_check Allison Henderson
2026-04-07 1:19 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-04-07 7:55 ` Allison Henderson
2026-04-07 1:19 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-07 7:54 ` Allison Henderson
2026-04-05 4:16 ` [PATCH net v1 2/2] net/rds: Restrict use of RDS/IB to the initial network namespace Allison Henderson
2026-04-07 1:19 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260407011900.3596320-1-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=achender@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rds-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox