From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Joe Damato <joe@dama.to>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>,
Pavan Chebbi <pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
horms@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, leon@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next v9 07/10] net: bnxt: Implement software USO
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2026 11:06:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260408110652.652e4732@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adaKt/VwrajKraR8@devvm20253.cco0.facebook.com>
On Wed, 8 Apr 2026 10:04:55 -0700 Joe Damato wrote:
> > This is the check I added. AI says this is wrong and netdev_queues.h says:
> >
> > * @get_desc must be a formula or a function call, it must always
> > * return up-to-date information when evaluated!
> >
> > which I obviously failed to do, so I'm pretty sure I got this wrong.
>
> So, there's two options to fix this that I can think of. I am leaning torward
> option 2, but if there are any strong opinions (or other options that I am
> missing) please let me know:
>
> 1. Allocate the maximum number of slots per ring and eliminate this check
> entirely. I figured this would be disliked because it potentially wastes
> memory. The driver would need ring_size / 3 slots, and if we assume the
> maximum is 2048 and the slot size is 256b, that works out to 175kb per
> ring. Of course, this only affects NICs with SW USO and the buffer isn't
> allocated for NICS with HW USO.
>
> This is probably simpler, but costs more memory than the existing design.
>
> 2. Or, keep the smaller buffer that we have now (BNXT_SW_USO_MAX_SEGS (64)
> * 256b = 16kb per ring) and fix the try_stop like this:
>
> +static inline u16 bnxt_inline_avail(struct bnxt_tx_ring_info *txr)
> +{
> + return BNXT_SW_USO_MAX_SEGS -
> + (u16)(txr->tx_inline_prod - READ_ONCE(txr->tx_inline_cons));
> +}
> +
>
> - slots = txr->tx_inline_prod - txr->tx_inline_cons;
> - slots = BNXT_SW_USO_MAX_SEGS - slots;
> -
> - if (unlikely(slots < num_segs)) {
> - netif_txq_try_stop(txq, slots, num_segs);
> + if (unlikely(bnxt_inline_avail(txr) < num_segs)) {
> + netif_txq_try_stop(txq, bnxt_inline_avail(txr), num_segs);
I think option 2 makes sense. The point (which I think you got) is that
the condition must be evaluated after the memory barrier.
Since the condition is repeated in your latest snippet - you can
probably use netif_txq_maybe_stop() ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-08 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-07 22:02 [net-next v9 00/10] Add TSO map-once DMA helpers and bnxt SW USO support Joe Damato
2026-04-07 22:02 ` [net-next v9 01/10] net: tso: Introduce tso_dma_map and helpers Joe Damato
2026-04-07 22:02 ` [net-next v9 02/10] net: bnxt: Export bnxt_xmit_get_cfa_action Joe Damato
2026-04-07 22:02 ` [net-next v9 03/10] net: bnxt: Add a helper for tx_bd_ext Joe Damato
2026-04-07 22:03 ` [net-next v9 04/10] net: bnxt: Use dma_unmap_len for TX completion unmapping Joe Damato
2026-04-07 22:03 ` [net-next v9 05/10] net: bnxt: Add TX inline buffer infrastructure Joe Damato
2026-04-07 22:03 ` [net-next v9 06/10] net: bnxt: Add boilerplate GSO code Joe Damato
2026-04-07 22:03 ` [net-next v9 07/10] net: bnxt: Implement software USO Joe Damato
2026-04-07 23:23 ` Joe Damato
2026-04-08 17:04 ` Joe Damato
2026-04-08 18:06 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-04-08 18:49 ` Joe Damato
2026-04-07 22:03 ` [net-next v9 08/10] net: bnxt: Add SW GSO completion and teardown support Joe Damato
2026-04-07 22:03 ` [net-next v9 09/10] net: bnxt: Dispatch to SW USO Joe Damato
2026-04-07 22:03 ` [net-next v9 10/10] selftests: drv-net: Add USO test Joe Damato
2026-04-08 3:14 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260408110652.652e4732@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=joe@dama.to \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox