From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: edumazet@google.com
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, ncardwell@google.com,
kuniyu@google.com, willemb@google.com, dsahern@kernel.org,
quic_subashab@quicinc.com, quic_stranche@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tcp: update window_clamp when SO_RCVBUF is set
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2026 11:11:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260408111107.077659c6@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260408001438.129165-1-kuba@kernel.org>
On Tue, 7 Apr 2026 17:14:38 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Commit under Fixes moved recomputing the window clamp to
> tcp_measure_rcv_mss() (when scaling_ratio changes).
> I suspect it missed the fact that we don't recompute the clamp
> when rcvbuf is set. Until scaling_ratio changes we are
> stuck with the old window clamp which may be based on
> the small initial buffer. scaling_ratio may never change.
>
> Inspired by Eric's recent commit d1361840f8c5 ("tcp: fix
> SO_RCVLOWAT and RCVBUF autotuning") plumb the user action
> thru to TCP and have it update the clamp.
>
> A smaller fix would be to just have tcp_rcvbuf_grow()
> adjust the clamp even if SOCK_RCVBUF_LOCK is set.
> But IIUC this is what we were trying to get away from
> in the first place.
Hi Eric, any thoughts?
I always assume you are displeased if you don't reply within 8 hours :)
I should say that everyone has obviously discouraged the team that run
into this from using SO_RCVBUF. I'm fascinated by how they decided that
it helps since it clearly doesn't work. AI sure makes it easy for
people to "try things". Sigh.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-08 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-08 0:14 [PATCH net] tcp: update window_clamp when SO_RCVBUF is set Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-08 18:11 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-04-08 18:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-04-08 19:27 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260408111107.077659c6@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=quic_stranche@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_subashab@quicinc.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox