public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ashutosh Desai <ashutoshdesai993@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	horms@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ashutosh Desai <ashutoshdesai993@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] nfc: hci: fix OOB heap read on short HCP frames
Date: Thu,  9 Apr 2026 15:08:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260409150825.2217133-1-ashutoshdesai993@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iKq=oQOmvDtK-Vtr7r9yrD29cURgv8VOJ15mFHyJ0kXmw@mail.gmail.com>

Both nfc_hci_recv_from_llc() and nfc_hci_msg_rx_work() cast skb->data
to struct hcp_packet and read the message header byte without verifying
the data is present in the linear sk_buff area. The same issue exists in
the NCI HCI path via nci_hci_data_received_cb() and nci_hci_msg_rx_work().

The initial fix checked skb->len, but that counts bytes in non-linear
fragments too. skb->data only covers the linear head, so a fragmented
skb with len >= 2 but the payload in a fragment would still result in
an out-of-bounds read. Eric Dumazet pointed this out.

Switch to pskb_may_pull() which validates that the requested bytes are
available and pulls fragment data into the linear area if needed, which
is the correct approach here.

Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Desai <ashutoshdesai993@gmail.com>
---
 net/nfc/hci/core.c | 9 +++++++++
 net/nfc/nci/hci.c  | 9 +++++++++
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/nfc/hci/core.c b/net/nfc/hci/core.c
index 0d33c81a1..b8fe59f44 100644
--- a/net/nfc/hci/core.c
+++ b/net/nfc/hci/core.c
@@ -134,6 +134,10 @@ static void nfc_hci_msg_rx_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	u8 instruction;
 
 	while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&hdev->msg_rx_queue)) != NULL) {
+		if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, NFC_HCI_HCP_HEADER_LEN)) {
+			kfree_skb(skb);
+			continue;
+		}
 		pipe = skb->data[0];
 		skb_pull(skb, NFC_HCI_HCP_PACKET_HEADER_LEN);
 		message = (struct hcp_message *)skb->data;
@@ -904,6 +908,11 @@ static void nfc_hci_recv_from_llc(struct nfc_hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	 * unblock waiting cmd context. Otherwise, enqueue to dispatch
 	 * in separate context where handler can also execute command.
 	 */
+	if (!pskb_may_pull(hcp_skb, NFC_HCI_HCP_HEADER_LEN)) {
+		kfree_skb(hcp_skb);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	packet = (struct hcp_packet *)hcp_skb->data;
 	type = HCP_MSG_GET_TYPE(packet->message.header);
 	if (type == NFC_HCI_HCP_RESPONSE) {
diff --git a/net/nfc/nci/hci.c b/net/nfc/nci/hci.c
index 40ae8e5a7..4243ca9b1 100644
--- a/net/nfc/nci/hci.c
+++ b/net/nfc/nci/hci.c
@@ -412,6 +412,10 @@ static void nci_hci_msg_rx_work(struct work_struct *work)
 
 	for (; (skb = skb_dequeue(&hdev->msg_rx_queue)); kcov_remote_stop()) {
 		kcov_remote_start_common(skb_get_kcov_handle(skb));
+		if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, NCI_HCI_HCP_HEADER_LEN)) {
+			kfree_skb(skb);
+			continue;
+		}
 		pipe = NCI_HCP_MSG_GET_PIPE(skb->data[0]);
 		skb_pull(skb, NCI_HCI_HCP_PACKET_HEADER_LEN);
 		message = (struct nci_hcp_message *)skb->data;
@@ -482,6 +486,11 @@ void nci_hci_data_received_cb(void *context,
 	 * unblock waiting cmd context. Otherwise, enqueue to dispatch
 	 * in separate context where handler can also execute command.
 	 */
+	if (!pskb_may_pull(hcp_skb, NCI_HCI_HCP_HEADER_LEN)) {
+		kfree_skb(hcp_skb);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	packet = (struct nci_hcp_packet *)hcp_skb->data;
 	type = NCI_HCP_MSG_GET_TYPE(packet->message.header);
 	if (type == NCI_HCI_HCP_RESPONSE) {
-- 
2.34.1


      reply	other threads:[~2026-04-09 15:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAKapqNnOF6BO2zE0MwNeM2_Hchp_d-qDQffywCg7Bk-pMcFKpw@mail.gmail.com>
2026-04-09  7:14 ` [PATCH] nfc: hci: fix OOB heap read on short HCP frames Eric Dumazet
2026-04-09 15:08   ` Ashutosh Desai [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260409150825.2217133-1-ashutoshdesai993@gmail.com \
    --to=ashutoshdesai993@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox