public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	linux-hams@vger.kernel.org, Yizhe Zhuang <yizhe@darknavy.com>,
	stable <stable@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netrom: do some basic forms of validation on incoming frames
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 11:28:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260410102827.GT469338@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026041026-excuse-slashing-c4ee@gregkh>

On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 07:24:36AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2026 at 08:32:35PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Apr 2026 20:03:28 +0100 Simon Horman wrote:
> > > I expect that checking skb->len isn't sufficient here
> > > and pskb_may_pull needs to be used to ensure that
> > > the data is also available in the linear section of the skb.
> > 
> > Or for simplicity we could also be testing against skb_headlen()
> > since we don't expect any legit non-linear frames here? Dunno.

Sure, that's find by me if it leads to simpler code than
using pskb_may_pull(). Else I'd lean towards pskb_may_pull()
as it is a more general approach that feels worth proliferating.

> I'll be glad to change this either way, your call.  Given that this is
> an obsolete protocol that seems to only be a target for drive-by fuzzers
> to attack, whatever the simplest thing to do to quiet them up I'll be
> glad to implement.
> 
> Or can we just delete this stuff entirely?  :)

Deleting sounds good to me.
But we likely need a deprecation process.
In which case fixing these bugs still makes sense for the short term.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-10 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-07  8:45 [PATCH net] netrom: do some basic forms of validation on incoming frames Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-04-09 19:03 ` Simon Horman
2026-04-10  3:32   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-10  5:24     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-04-10 10:28       ` Simon Horman [this message]
2026-04-10 15:12         ` jj
2026-04-10 16:38           ` David Ranch
2026-04-10 17:21             ` Dan Carpenter
2026-04-10 18:23           ` Dan Cross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260410102827.GT469338@kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=yizhe@darknavy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox