From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
dw@davidwei.uk, skhawaja@google.com, bestswngs@gmail.com,
razor@blackwall.org, daniel@iogearbox.net
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: fix reference tracker mismanagement in netdev_put_lock()
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 08:36:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260410153600.1984522-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
dev_put() releases a reference which didn't have a tracker.
References without a tracker are accounted in the tracking
code as "no_tracker". We can't free the tracker and then
call dev_put(). The references themselves will be fine
but the tracking code will think it's a double-release:
refcount_t: decrement hit 0; leaking memory.
IOW commit under fixes confused dev_put() (release never tracked
reference) with __dev_put() (just release the reference, skipping
the reference tracking infra).
Since __netdev_put_lock() uses dev_put() we can't feed a previously
tracked netdev ref into it. Let's flip things around.
netdev_put(dev, NULL) is the same as dev_put(dev) so make
netdev_put_lock() the real function and have __netdev_put_lock()
feed it a NULL tracker for all the cases that were untracked.
Fixes: d04686d9bc86 ("net: Implement netdev_nl_queue_create_doit")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
CC: dw@davidwei.uk
CC: skhawaja@google.com
CC: bestswngs@gmail.com
CC: razor@blackwall.org
CC: daniel@iogearbox.net
---
net/core/dev.h | 8 +++++++-
net/core/dev.c | 16 +++++-----------
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.h b/net/core/dev.h
index 376bac4a82da..628bdaebf0ca 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.h
+++ b/net/core/dev.h
@@ -31,9 +31,15 @@ struct napi_struct *
netdev_napi_by_id_lock(struct net *net, unsigned int napi_id);
struct net_device *dev_get_by_napi_id(unsigned int napi_id);
-struct net_device *__netdev_put_lock(struct net_device *dev, struct net *net);
struct net_device *netdev_put_lock(struct net_device *dev, struct net *net,
netdevice_tracker *tracker);
+
+static inline struct net_device *
+__netdev_put_lock(struct net_device *dev, struct net *net)
+{
+ return netdev_put_lock(dev, net, NULL);
+}
+
struct net_device *
netdev_xa_find_lock(struct net *net, struct net_device *dev,
unsigned long *index);
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index e7bc95cbd1fa..4a82983e8616 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -1060,16 +1060,18 @@ struct net_device *dev_get_by_napi_id(unsigned int napi_id)
* This helper is intended for locking net_device after it has been looked up
* using a lockless lookup helper. Lock prevents the instance from going away.
*/
-struct net_device *__netdev_put_lock(struct net_device *dev, struct net *net)
+struct net_device *
+netdev_put_lock(struct net_device *dev, struct net *net,
+ netdevice_tracker *tracker)
{
netdev_lock(dev);
if (dev->reg_state > NETREG_REGISTERED ||
dev->moving_ns || !net_eq(dev_net(dev), net)) {
netdev_unlock(dev);
- dev_put(dev);
+ netdev_put(dev, tracker);
return NULL;
}
- dev_put(dev);
+ netdev_put(dev, tracker);
return dev;
}
@@ -1121,14 +1123,6 @@ netdev_get_by_index_lock_ops_compat(struct net *net, int ifindex)
return __netdev_put_lock_ops_compat(dev, net);
}
-struct net_device *
-netdev_put_lock(struct net_device *dev, struct net *net,
- netdevice_tracker *tracker)
-{
- netdev_tracker_free(dev, tracker);
- return __netdev_put_lock(dev, net);
-}
-
struct net_device *
netdev_xa_find_lock(struct net *net, struct net_device *dev,
unsigned long *index)
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-04-10 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-10 15:36 Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-04-10 16:04 ` [PATCH net-next] net: fix reference tracker mismanagement in netdev_put_lock() Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260410153600.1984522-1-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bestswngs@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox