From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Qingfang Deng <qingfang.deng@linux.dev>
Cc: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>,
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@gmail.com>,
Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>, Jaco Kroon <jaco@uls.co.za>,
James Carlson <carlsonj@workingcode.com>,
Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@intel.com>,
Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 2/2] pppoe: drop PFC frames
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 18:11:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260410171115.GE469338@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260410033627.93786-2-qingfang.deng@linux.dev>
On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 11:36:21AM +0800, Qingfang Deng wrote:
> RFC 2516 Section 7 states that Protocol Field Compression (PFC) is NOT
> RECOMMENDED for PPPoE. In practice, pppd does not support negotiating
> PFC for PPPoE sessions, and the current PPPoE driver assumes an
> uncompressed (2-byte) protocol field. However, the generic PPP layer
> function ppp_input() is not aware of the negotiation result, and still
> accepts PFC frames.
>
> If a peer with a broken implementation or an attacker sends a frame with
> a compressed (1-byte) protocol field, the subsequent PPP payload is
> shifted by one byte. This causes the network header to be 4-byte
> misaligned, which may trigger unaligned access exceptions on some
> architectures.
>
> To reduce the attack surface, drop PPPoE PFC frames. Introduce
> ppp_skb_is_compressed_proto() helper function to be used in both
> ppp_generic.c and pppoe.c to avoid open-coding.
>
> Fixes: 7fb1b8ca8fa1 ("ppp: Move PFC decompression to PPP generic layer")
> Signed-off-by: Qingfang Deng <qingfang.deng@linux.dev>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> Update Fixes tag as suggested by AI review
> Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260409031107.616630-2-qingfang.deng@linux.dev
> Changes in v3:
> Fix kdoc warning
> Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260408024245.312732-1-qingfang.deng@linux.dev
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-10 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-10 3:36 [PATCH net v4 1/2] flow_dissector: do not dissect PPPoE PFC frames Qingfang Deng
2026-04-10 3:36 ` [PATCH net v4 2/2] pppoe: drop " Qingfang Deng
2026-04-10 17:11 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2026-04-10 17:10 ` [PATCH net v4 1/2] flow_dissector: do not dissect PPPoE " Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260410171115.GE469338@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=carlsonj@workingcode.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ericwouds@gmail.com \
--cc=gnault@redhat.com \
--cc=jaco@uls.co.za \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcin.szycik@linux.intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
--cc=qingfang.deng@linux.dev \
--cc=semen.protsenko@linaro.org \
--cc=wojciech.drewek@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox