From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com
Cc: 'Simon Horman' <horms@kernel.org>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net v2 6/6] ixgbe: fix integer overflow and wrong bit position in ixgbe_validate_rtr()
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 15:03:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260413140307.715409-1-horms@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260408131154.2661818-7-aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
From: 'Simon Horman' <horms@kernel.org>
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
Full review at: https://sashiko.dev
---
ixgbe: fix integer overflow and wrong bit position in ixgbe_validate_rtr()
This commit fixes two bugs in ixgbe_validate_rtr() by masking the
traffic-class field properly before assigning it to a u8, and correctly
shifting the mask for clearing out-of-bounds entries.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> index 5ff462a848feb..8ebf717ce4017 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> @@ -9782,11 +9782,12 @@ static void ixgbe_validate_rtr(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter, u8 tc)
> rsave = reg;
>
> for (i = 0; i < MAX_TRAFFIC_CLASS; i++) {
> - u8 up2tc = reg >> (i * IXGBE_RTRUP2TC_UP_SHIFT);
> + u8 up2tc = (reg >> (i * IXGBE_RTRUP2TC_UP_SHIFT)) &
> + IXGBE_RTRUP2TC_UP_MASK;
>
> /* If up2tc is out of bounds default to zero */
> if (up2tc > tc)
This wasn't introduced by this patch, but is there a pre-existing off-by-one
error in this bounds check?
If tc represents the number of enabled traffic classes (e.g., 4), the valid TC
indices would be 0 through tc - 1. If up2tc equals tc, it would be out of
bounds, but the condition up2tc > tc will evaluate to false and the invalid
mapping won't be cleared.
Could this allow an invalid UP-to-TC mapping to persist in the hardware
register, potentially causing received packets to be mis-steered to an
uninitialized or non-existent traffic class queue?
Should the condition be corrected to ensure up2tc is strictly less than tc
when tc > 0?
> - reg &= ~(0x7 << IXGBE_RTRUP2TC_UP_SHIFT);
> + reg &= ~(IXGBE_RTRUP2TC_UP_MASK << (i * IXGBE_RTRUP2TC_UP_SHIFT));
> }
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-13 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-08 13:11 [PATCH iwl-net v2 0/6] ixgbe: six bug fixes Aleksandr Loktionov
2026-04-08 13:11 ` [PATCH iwl-net v2 1/6] ixgbe: fix SWFW semaphore timeout for X550 family Aleksandr Loktionov
2026-04-13 10:52 ` Simon Horman
2026-04-14 0:56 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jacob Keller
2026-04-08 13:11 ` [PATCH iwl-net v2 2/6] ixgbe: add bounds check for debugfs register access Aleksandr Loktionov
2026-04-13 10:30 ` Simon Horman
2026-04-14 1:00 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jacob Keller
2026-04-14 17:16 ` Simon Horman
2026-04-08 13:11 ` [PATCH iwl-net v2 3/6] ixgbe: call ixgbe_setup_fc() before fc_enable() after NVM update Aleksandr Loktionov
2026-04-13 10:51 ` Simon Horman
2026-04-08 13:11 ` [PATCH iwl-net v2 4/6] ixgbe: fix cls_u32 nexthdr path returning success when no entry installed Aleksandr Loktionov
2026-04-13 10:54 ` Simon Horman
2026-04-08 13:11 ` [PATCH iwl-net v2 5/6] ixgbe: fix ITR value overflow in adaptive interrupt throttling Aleksandr Loktionov
2026-04-13 13:39 ` Simon Horman
2026-04-08 13:11 ` [PATCH iwl-net v2 6/6] ixgbe: fix integer overflow and wrong bit position in ixgbe_validate_rtr() Aleksandr Loktionov
2026-04-13 13:43 ` Simon Horman
2026-04-13 14:02 ` Simon Horman
2026-04-13 14:03 ` Simon Horman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260413140307.715409-1-horms@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox