From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: phx0fer@gmail.com
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
jiri@resnulli.us, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jhs@mojatatu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/sched: act_ct: fix skb leak on fragment check failure
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:10:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260415141027.807275-1-horms@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260413084609.69560-1-phx0fer@gmail.com>
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
For local reproduction steps see https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html
---
net/sched: act_ct: fix skb leak on fragment check failure
This commit fixes a socket buffer leak in the act_ct traffic control action.
When tcf_ct_handle_fragments() encounters malformed fragments and returns an
error, the skb was not being freed, leading to memory exhaustion under
sustained traffic. The fix changes the return value to TC_ACT_SHOT to ensure
proper cleanup.
> net/sched: act_ct: fix skb leak on fragment check failure
>
> tcf_ct_handle_fragments() returns TC_ACT_CONSUMED when
> tcf_ct_ipv4/6_is_fragment() fails. This causes the caller to
The commit message contains a technical inaccuracy. It states
'tcf_ct_handle_fragments() returns TC_ACT_CONSUMED when
tcf_ct_ipv4/6_is_fragment() fails', but tcf_ct_handle_fragments() returns
integer error codes (like -EINVAL, -ENOMEM, -EPROTO), not TC action codes.
The function that returns TC_ACT_CONSUMED is tcf_ct_act(), which interprets
the error codes from tcf_ct_handle_fragments(). The code fix itself is
correct - only the commit message attribution is wrong.
More accurate would be: 'tcf_ct_act() returns TC_ACT_CONSUMED when
tcf_ct_handle_fragments() fails'.
> believe the skb was consumed, but it was not freed. Each
> malformed fragment leaks one skb, leading to OOM DoS under
> sustained traffic.
>
> Change the return value to TC_ACT_SHOT so the skb is properly
> freed by the caller.
>
> Fixes: b57dc7c13ea9 ("net/sched: Introduce action ct")
The existing Fixes: tag points to commit b57dc7c13ea9 ("net/sched: Introduce
action ct"), but the bug was actually introduced by commit 3f14b377d01d
("net/sched: act_ct: fix skb leak and crash on ooo frags").
The original commit b57dc7c13ea9 had correct error handling where fragment
check failures went to the 'drop' label. Commit 3f14b377d01d introduced the
'out_frag' label that always returns TC_ACT_CONSUMED, causing the skb leak
when fragment checks fail with errors other than -EINPROGRESS.
Suggested: Fixes: 3f14b377d01d ("net/sched: act_ct: fix skb leak and crash on ooo frags")
> Signed-off-by: Dudu Lu <phx0fer@gmail.com>
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/act_ct.c b/net/sched/act_ct.c
> index 7d5e50c921a0..870655f682bd 100644
> --- a/net/sched/act_ct.c
> +++ b/net/sched/act_ct.c
> @@ -1107,8 +1107,10 @@ TC_INDIRECT_SCOPE int tcf_ct_act(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a,
> return retval;
>
> out_frag:
> - if (err != -EINPROGRESS)
> + if (err != -EINPROGRESS) {
> tcf_action_inc_drop_qstats(&c->common);
> + return TC_ACT_SHOT;
> + }
> return TC_ACT_CONSUMED;
>
> drop:
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-15 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-13 8:46 [PATCH] net/sched: act_ct: fix skb leak on fragment check failure Dudu Lu
2026-04-15 14:10 ` Simon Horman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260415141027.807275-1-horms@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phx0fer@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox