From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16D6633F378; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 13:38:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776260303; cv=none; b=Td2AJpZulapfEaAB4tSqOZgh9UTvDD6zIHcphaDXtmuvIZcn6gxNbELbs4vuyNjaCDImKrJax/4LK/cUehFgJ4KUVjkaNQcfWZO+q94rPYu+ogp3wI/w7BAPt2NOhIfFzehpB2gspWc8ajtaXYWMfoZWs/VoQiVQjXUL39Hhcuk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776260303; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bZqt6vLbbY7wV9vBAY98g6ZXIP63PameKJz0SxWrAgE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Lpxcgi81Ranpq8UfmwcGEtmN6bmSKjPRjcbpWTkPxRv6X6nVzeVpcbX0+rvvQJtAbiQaHy23tK3PbYAzcwlTs3wJF59zfempf8r+bG1wfqjwKX6iQT6/+31sZQTyglO+YCZgy5aVOnU4ZcpHuqCA2A5AmEUtBEx4KU+kHJijX7o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=CH2Yq5fs; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="CH2Yq5fs" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1776260302; x=1807796302; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=bZqt6vLbbY7wV9vBAY98g6ZXIP63PameKJz0SxWrAgE=; b=CH2Yq5fsUJgqAQPn8f85HRgtahDvOd267S7cyImXNI9EDQNciOdmcfBw EkagcSnZDImaB77joJw66BlGb9srssHvDx9ckASd7CjCjI8NNwNjRSBtk kVvC8wfIaGg4w3P8jvtgZVa/779JEltQYcAJ4cTTil4z00CGHM7TrEjPD hMuXoONiYZny4XnROK6Z7XyzND7FpK7ksL1+7cwMl6u0Tk7hJkbJXnMpr EessYY7i14GyB9WxF1AJ/S56qojdABpONU+gmAJKyTQnpSCqKfqfRDBEQ LH0c3ifTRteRVugb4XTfuArTkRw9i3rDgiSk6VURFy212y7mHakaFRvvb Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Hh/xPqGRS/iEPQyfvchGIg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: yYuoigTnSpqQQHI1+xzU7A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11759"; a="88615723" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,179,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="88615723" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Apr 2026 06:38:22 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: rK1wKLmkSD+RjgV8lrGs2A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: /u+gW7pHSaqh7UMzNKJWwQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,179,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="235367890" Received: from igk-lkp-server01.igk.intel.com (HELO bdf09bfdbd5f) ([10.211.93.152]) by fmviesa005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Apr 2026 06:38:20 -0700 Received: from kbuild by bdf09bfdbd5f with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wD0Rd-000000000kz-2PTm; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 13:38:17 +0000 Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:37:31 +0200 From: kernel test robot To: Pavitra Jha , pabeni@redhat.com Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, w@1wt.eu, chandrashekar.devegowda@intel.com, linux-wwan@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Pavitra Jha Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: wwan: t7xx: validate port_count against message length in t7xx_port_enum_msg_handler Message-ID: <202604151531.ClMVCCxv-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260414153201.1633720-1-jhapavitra98@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260414153201.1633720-1-jhapavitra98@gmail.com> Hi Pavitra, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on net/main] [also build test WARNING on net-next/main linus/master v7.0 next-20260415] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Pavitra-Jha/net-wwan-t7xx-validate-port_count-against-message-length-in-t7xx_port_enum_msg_handler/20260415-014321 base: net/main patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260414153201.1633720-1-jhapavitra98%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH v2] net: wwan: t7xx: validate port_count against message length in t7xx_port_enum_msg_handler config: x86_64-rhel-9.4 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260415/202604151531.ClMVCCxv-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260415/202604151531.ClMVCCxv-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202604151531.ClMVCCxv-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> Warning: drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_port_ctrl_msg.c:127 function parameter 'msg_len' not described in 't7xx_port_enum_msg_handler' >> Warning: drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_port_ctrl_msg.c:127 function parameter 'msg_len' not described in 't7xx_port_enum_msg_handler' -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki