From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A8F41DDC37; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 11:10:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776251402; cv=none; b=sHB8LTsJyduQHuhnBEQMLuF9047pXT0zie/kHwXJ1hqpN5F6NyoFSJFZPc4MyTzbEUIIEoqBpwSStVPNRNylu2tP7DjgZCAWAqRBpqBQt1ubFowi36lBeV74kwqqtq/h2nWQo70XP8IzzSO/hOymyt58xA9fOFcYevXus0X9U4Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776251402; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zYISl4YymA6/eZuqTpBh/rfh+fOUzsz13rpCC8OY6V8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=sy43weZoV6g5AxrEk44Ww2BTcKMDeYO/gUKbXQ9WJIicojXnd3esT3w9BA9709FTXs0e+SaOrJ6JYyHycyWPuSfkoBhGPopD/GxF5nHL/Jp/26P5LA68/PDkcSZfHsj6wa3xB66JPfwNVSE79y2crYHTG/uQampEHWs6m2AVGbY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=hqcd++Kc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="hqcd++Kc" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1776251401; x=1807787401; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=zYISl4YymA6/eZuqTpBh/rfh+fOUzsz13rpCC8OY6V8=; b=hqcd++KcA7zhwP5ztzfeHt6lzZmdwWZwx/ebRVMKkvkk1u/7tRI81Jcn FaV7SODX4CWFyp4XqNh8t25MqYu773HWQ7+8vu4RemWd/ehdQNszWx7JR lW8IlxqCVZC7tyI2DHgrMq/TK7drK944TqOxQfFCI5uMqs+wClW5FFvxa AMTNPX6T2Dw5gCfPjNcbs/YOfkaHzXD8s8E9zFgBrLO5zMExOEkmXx8Ll 18ZS1Na69H5EwlrexO1pYLwRmwsgeOX9Biip9KAl7Lp9GxEOssjer67qq KBhojTKPEW9HLG/Uhjr2dvuH6Bx1BWMCXM9m+RfUER2IrunNpsfwglT3t g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ZX6wt3OPQjK63f9ZD0VUmw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: L36afjqwQ5OWp/+NkZTLLw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11759"; a="76256665" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,179,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="76256665" Received: from orviesa003.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.143]) by fmvoesa113.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Apr 2026 04:10:00 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: QrNsoN+gSWKbOlpE4G79ZA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: lD75H1XmRnuQeEwDr7YlWA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,179,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="234425047" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 7f3b36e5d6a5) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Apr 2026 04:09:57 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 7f3b36e5d6a5 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wCy82-000000000QT-3cBT; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 11:09:54 +0000 Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 19:09:45 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Pavitra Jha , pabeni@redhat.com Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, w@1wt.eu, chandrashekar.devegowda@intel.com, linux-wwan@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Pavitra Jha Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: wwan: t7xx: validate port_count against message length in t7xx_port_enum_msg_handler Message-ID: <202604151900.1tnLdQi7-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260414153201.1633720-1-jhapavitra98@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260414153201.1633720-1-jhapavitra98@gmail.com> Hi Pavitra, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on net/main] [also build test WARNING on net-next/main linus/master v7.0 next-20260414] [cannot apply to horms-ipvs/master] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Pavitra-Jha/net-wwan-t7xx-validate-port_count-against-message-length-in-t7xx_port_enum_msg_handler/20260415-014321 base: net/main patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260414153201.1633720-1-jhapavitra98%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH v2] net: wwan: t7xx: validate port_count against message length in t7xx_port_enum_msg_handler config: loongarch-randconfig-002-20260415 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260415/202604151900.1tnLdQi7-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 23.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 5bac06718f502014fade905512f1d26d578a18f3) rustc: rustc 1.88.0 (6b00bc388 2025-06-23) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260415/202604151900.1tnLdQi7-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202604151900.1tnLdQi7-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> Warning: drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_port_ctrl_msg.c:127 function parameter 'msg_len' not described in 't7xx_port_enum_msg_handler' >> Warning: drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_port_ctrl_msg.c:127 function parameter 'msg_len' not described in 't7xx_port_enum_msg_handler' -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki