From: Zhenzhong Wu <jt26wzz@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: edumazet@google.com, ncardwell@google.com, kuniyu@google.com,
davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
tamird@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Zhenzhong Wu <jt26wzz@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH net v3 0/2] tcp: fix listener wakeup after reuseport migration
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 20:31:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260421123106.142299-1-jt26wzz@gmail.com> (raw)
This series fixes a missing wakeup when inet_csk_listen_stop() migrates
an established child socket from a closing listener to another socket
in the same SO_REUSEPORT group after the child has already been queued
for accept.
The target listener receives the migrated accept-queue entry via
inet_csk_reqsk_queue_add(), but its waiters are not notified.
Nonblocking accept() still succeeds because it checks the accept queue
directly, but readiness-based waiters can remain asleep until another
connection generates a wakeup.
Patch 1 notifies the target listener after a successful migration in
inet_csk_listen_stop() and protects the post-queue_add() nsk accesses
with rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock().
Patch 2 extends the existing migrate_reuseport BPF selftest with epoll
readiness checks inside migrate_dance(), around shutdown() where the
migration happens. The test now verifies that the target listener is
not ready before migration and becomes ready immediately after it, for
both TCP_ESTABLISHED and TCP_SYN_RECV. TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV remains
excluded because it still depends on later handshake completion.
Testing:
- On a local unpatched kernel, the focused migrate_reuseport test
fails for the listener-migration cases and passes for the
TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV cases:
not ok 1 IPv4 TCP_ESTABLISHED inet_csk_listen_stop
not ok 2 IPv4 TCP_SYN_RECV inet_csk_listen_stop
ok 3 IPv4 TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV reqsk_timer_handler
ok 4 IPv4 TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV inet_csk_complete_hashdance
not ok 5 IPv6 TCP_ESTABLISHED inet_csk_listen_stop
not ok 6 IPv6 TCP_SYN_RECV inet_csk_listen_stop
ok 7 IPv6 TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV reqsk_timer_handler
ok 8 IPv6 TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV inet_csk_complete_hashdance
- On a patched kernel booted under QEMU, the full migrate_reuseport
selftest passes:
ok 1 IPv4 TCP_ESTABLISHED inet_csk_listen_stop
ok 2 IPv4 TCP_SYN_RECV inet_csk_listen_stop
ok 3 IPv4 TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV reqsk_timer_handler
ok 4 IPv4 TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV inet_csk_complete_hashdance
ok 5 IPv6 TCP_ESTABLISHED inet_csk_listen_stop
ok 6 IPv6 TCP_SYN_RECV inet_csk_listen_stop
ok 7 IPv6 TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV reqsk_timer_handler
ok 8 IPv6 TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV inet_csk_complete_hashdance
SELFTEST_RC=0
---
v3:
- update the selftest patch as suggested by Kuniyuki Iwashima
- update the test flow comment to match the new epoll checks
- initialize epoll to -1 to avoid a compiler warning in the selftest
v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260418181333.1713389-1-jt26wzz@gmail.com/
v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260418041633.691435-1-jt26wzz@gmail.com/
Zhenzhong Wu (2):
tcp: call sk_data_ready() after listener migration
selftests/bpf: check epoll readiness during reuseport migration
net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 3 ++
.../bpf/prog_tests/migrate_reuseport.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
base-commit: 52bcb57a4e8a0865a76c587c2451906342ae1b2d
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-04-21 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-21 12:31 Zhenzhong Wu [this message]
2026-04-21 12:31 ` [PATCH net v3 1/2] tcp: call sk_data_ready() after listener migration Zhenzhong Wu
2026-04-21 12:31 ` [PATCH net v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: check epoll readiness during reuseport migration Zhenzhong Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260421123106.142299-1-jt26wzz@gmail.com \
--to=jt26wzz@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tamird@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox