From: KaFai Wan <kafai.wan@linux.dev>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
memxor@gmail.com, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
jolsa@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, dsahern@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
ihor.solodrai@linux.dev, kafai.wan@linux.dev,
jiayuan.chen@linux.dev, hoyeon.lee@suse.com, ameryhung@gmail.com,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/4] selftests/bpf: Verify bpf-tcp-cc rejects TCP_NODELAY
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 23:58:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260421155804.135786-5-kafai.wan@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260421155804.135786-1-kafai.wan@linux.dev>
Add a bpf_tcp_ca selftest for the TCP_NODELAY restriction in
bpf-tcp-cc.
Update bpf_cubic to exercise init() and cwnd_event_tx_start(),
and check that both callbacks reject bpf_setsockopt(TCP_NODELAY)
with -EOPNOTSUPP.
Signed-off-by: KaFai Wan <kafai.wan@linux.dev>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c | 4 ++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_cubic.c | 12 ++++++++++++
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
index f829b6f09bc9..4f632aa3a79e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
@@ -112,6 +112,10 @@ static void test_cubic(void)
ASSERT_EQ(cubic_skel->bss->bpf_cubic_acked_called, 1, "pkts_acked called");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(cubic_skel->data->nodelay_init_reject, "init reject nodelay option");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(cubic_skel->data->nodelay_cwnd_event_tx_start_reject,
+ "cwnd_event_tx_start reject nodelay option");
+
bpf_link__destroy(link);
bpf_cubic__destroy(cubic_skel);
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_cubic.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_cubic.c
index ce18a4db813f..b941ab3ebad5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_cubic.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_cubic.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include "bpf_tracing_net.h"
#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include <errno.h>
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
@@ -170,10 +171,17 @@ static void bictcp_hystart_reset(struct sock *sk)
ca->sample_cnt = 0;
}
+bool nodelay_init_reject = true;
+bool nodelay_cwnd_event_tx_start_reject = true;
+
SEC("struct_ops")
void BPF_PROG(bpf_cubic_init, struct sock *sk)
{
struct bpf_bictcp *ca = inet_csk_ca(sk);
+ int true_val = 1, ret;
+
+ ret = bpf_setsockopt(sk, SOL_TCP, TCP_NODELAY, &true_val, sizeof(true_val));
+ nodelay_init_reject &= ret == -EOPNOTSUPP;
bictcp_reset(ca);
@@ -189,8 +197,12 @@ void BPF_PROG(bpf_cubic_cwnd_event_tx_start, struct sock *sk)
{
struct bpf_bictcp *ca = inet_csk_ca(sk);
__u32 now = tcp_jiffies32;
+ int true_val = 1, ret;
__s32 delta;
+ ret = bpf_setsockopt(sk, SOL_TCP, TCP_NODELAY, &true_val, sizeof(true_val));
+ nodelay_cwnd_event_tx_start_reject &= ret == -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
delta = now - tcp_sk(sk)->lsndtime;
/* We were application limited (idle) for a while.
--
2.43.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-21 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-21 15:58 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/4] bpf: Reject TCP_NODELAY in TCP header option KaFai Wan
2026-04-21 15:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/4] bpf: Reject TCP_NODELAY in TCP header option callbacks KaFai Wan
2026-04-21 16:51 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-21 15:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/4] bpf: Reject TCP_NODELAY in bpf-tcp-cc KaFai Wan
2026-04-21 15:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/4] selftests/bpf: Test TCP_NODELAY in TCP hdr opt callbacks KaFai Wan
2026-04-21 15:58 ` KaFai Wan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260421155804.135786-5-kafai.wan@linux.dev \
--to=kafai.wan@linux.dev \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=hoyeon.lee@suse.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox