public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Ren Wei <n05ec@lzu.edu.cn>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, kees@kernel.org, yuantan098@gmail.com,
	ylong030@ucr.edu, yifanwucs@gmail.com, tomapufckgml@gmail.com,
	bird@lzu.edu.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] 8021q: delete cleared egress QoS mappings
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 17:20:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260422162041.GO651125@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ecfa6f6ce2467a42647ff4c5221238ae85b79a59.1776647968.git.yuantan098@gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 11:18:46AM +0800, Ren Wei wrote:
> From: Longxuan Yu <ylong030@ucr.edu>
> 
> vlan_dev_set_egress_priority() currently keeps cleared egress
> priority mappings in the hash as tombstones. Repeated set/clear cycles
> with distinct skb priorities therefore accumulate mapping nodes until
> device teardown and leak memory.
> 
> Delete mappings when vlan_prio is cleared instead of keeping tombstones.
> Now that the egress mapping lists are RCU protected, the node can be
> unlinked safely and freed after a grace period.
> 
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Cc: stable@kernel.org
> Reported-by: Yifan Wu <yifanwucs@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: Juefei Pu <tomapufckgml@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: Xin Liu <bird@lzu.edu.cn>
> Co-developed-by: Yuan Tan <yuantan098@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yuan Tan <yuantan098@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Longxuan Yu <ylong030@ucr.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Ren Wei <n05ec@lzu.edu.cn>
> ---
>  net/8021q/vlan_dev.c     | 20 ++++++++++++++------
>  net/8021q/vlan_netlink.c |  4 ----
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/8021q/vlan_dev.c b/net/8021q/vlan_dev.c
> index a5340932b657..7aa3af8b10ea 100644
> --- a/net/8021q/vlan_dev.c
> +++ b/net/8021q/vlan_dev.c
> @@ -172,26 +172,34 @@ int vlan_dev_set_egress_priority(const struct net_device *dev,
>  				 u32 skb_prio, u16 vlan_prio)
>  {
>  	struct vlan_dev_priv *vlan = vlan_dev_priv(dev);
> +	struct vlan_priority_tci_mapping __rcu **mpp;
>  	struct vlan_priority_tci_mapping *mp;
>  	struct vlan_priority_tci_mapping *np;
>  	u32 bucket = skb_prio & 0xF;
>  	u32 vlan_qos = (vlan_prio << VLAN_PRIO_SHIFT) & VLAN_PRIO_MASK;
>  
>  	/* See if a priority mapping exists.. */
> -	mp = rtnl_dereference(vlan->egress_priority_map[bucket]);
> +	mpp = &vlan->egress_priority_map[bucket];
> +	mp = rtnl_dereference(*mpp);
>  	while (mp) {
>  		if (mp->priority == skb_prio) {
> -			if (mp->vlan_qos && !vlan_qos)
> +			if (!vlan_qos) {
> +				rcu_assign_pointer(*mpp, rtnl_dereference(mp->next));
>  				vlan->nr_egress_mappings--;
> -			else if (!mp->vlan_qos && vlan_qos)
> -				vlan->nr_egress_mappings++;
> -			WRITE_ONCE(mp->vlan_qos, vlan_qos);
> +				kfree_rcu(mp, rcu);
> +			} else {
> +				WRITE_ONCE(mp->vlan_qos, vlan_qos);
> +			}
>  			return 0;
>  		}
> -		mp = rtnl_dereference(mp->next);
> +		mpp = &mp->next;
> +		mp = rtnl_dereference(*mpp);
>  	}

Hi Ren,

Thanks for splitting up the patchset, it is very helpful to me.

It seems to me that the mpp/mp construct used is a bit complex and
stems from the use of a hand-rolled list centred the next field of
struct vlan_priority_tci_mapping.

I wonder if things can be simplified by moving to use a standardised
list construct, such as an hlist. And the helpers available for using it.

>  
>  	/* Create a new mapping then. */
> +	if (!vlan_qos)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	np = kmalloc_obj(struct vlan_priority_tci_mapping);
>  	if (!np)
>  		return -ENOBUFS;

...

      reply	other threads:[~2026-04-22 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-20  3:18 [PATCH net v2 1/2] 8021q: use RCU for egress QoS mappings Ren Wei
2026-04-20  3:18 ` [PATCH net v2 2/2] 8021q: delete cleared " Ren Wei
2026-04-22 16:20   ` Simon Horman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260422162041.GO651125@horms.kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=bird@lzu.edu.cn \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=n05ec@lzu.edu.cn \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=tomapufckgml@gmail.com \
    --cc=yifanwucs@gmail.com \
    --cc=ylong030@ucr.edu \
    --cc=yuantan098@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox