From: Adrian Moreno <amorenoz@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: aconole@redhat.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
Adrian Moreno <amorenoz@redhat.com>,
dev@openvswitch.org (open list:OPENVSWITCH),
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list),
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] Decouple flow operations from RTNL
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 11:11:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260427091153.3210301-1-amorenoz@redhat.com> (raw)
When RTNL is contended, network-related control-plane operations can be
delayed.
In such scenario, if OVS control-plane operations (such as vport
creation) take a bit longer, it's acceptable. However, flow installation
operations happen as part of upcall processing, executed in the context
of of handler threads. If they get delayed, it affects the data-plane
and can even result in packet drops.
Because flow operations also use ovs_mutex for concurrency protection and
given RTNL can nest under ovs_mutex, contention can be easily transferred
from RTNL to ovs_mutex, causing delay in flow operations.
In order to protect flow operations from RTNL delays, this series
decouples them from ovs_mutex. First, the flow_table is converted into an
rcu-protected pointer. Then two locking mechanisms are introduced: a
per-table mutex and a refcount.
The mutex protects the flow_table against concurrent modifications,
while the refcount is used to extend the lifetime of the flow_table
beyond the rcu read-protected region used to dereference it.
v3:
- Split in 2 patches (Paolo)
- Improve locking in get_dp_stats (Paolo and Sashiko)
- Use __always_unused in lockdep stubs (Paolo)
- Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE for table->count (Aaron)
- Take a reference in ovs_dp_masks_rebalance (Aaron)
v2: Fix argument in ovs_flow_tbl_put (sparse)
Remove rcu checks in ovs_dp_masks_rebalance
Adrian Moreno (2):
net: openvswitch: make flow_table an rcu pointer
net: openvswitch: decouple flow_table from ovs_mutex
net/openvswitch/datapath.c | 293 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
net/openvswitch/datapath.h | 2 +-
net/openvswitch/flow.c | 13 +-
net/openvswitch/flow.h | 9 +-
net/openvswitch/flow_table.c | 194 ++++++++++++++---------
net/openvswitch/flow_table.h | 56 ++++++-
6 files changed, 396 insertions(+), 171 deletions(-)
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-04-27 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-27 9:11 Adrian Moreno [this message]
2026-04-27 9:11 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] net: openvswitch: make flow_table an rcu pointer Adrian Moreno
2026-04-27 9:11 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net: openvswitch: decouple flow_table from ovs_mutex Adrian Moreno
2026-04-27 23:23 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] Decouple flow operations from RTNL Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260427091153.3210301-1-amorenoz@redhat.com \
--to=amorenoz@redhat.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox