From: Tushar Vyavahare <tushar.vyavahare@intel.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@intel.com,
maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com, stfomichev@gmail.com,
kernelxing@tencent.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com, tushar.vyavahare@intel.com
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] selftests/xsk: Introduce helpers for setting UMEM properties
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:33:12 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260428080317.702124-2-tushar.vyavahare@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260428080317.702124-1-tushar.vyavahare@intel.com>
UMEM properties are set via open-coded field assignments in multiple test
paths, which makes updates noisy and error-prone.
Introduce three helpers to set UMEM properties through a single interface.
This keeps setup logic consistent across tests and makes future refactoring
simpler.
No functional behavior change is intended.
Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tushar Vyavahare <tushar.vyavahare@intel.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c | 48 +++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c
index 7950c504ed28..d5cd8f590b25 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c
@@ -303,6 +303,22 @@ static void test_spec_reset(struct test_spec *test)
__test_spec_init(test, test->ifobj_tx, test->ifobj_rx);
}
+static void test_spec_set_unaligned(struct test_spec *test)
+{
+ test_spec_set_unaligned(test);
+}
+
+static void test_spec_set_frame_size(struct test_spec *test, u32 size)
+{
+ test->ifobj_tx->umem->frame_size = size;
+ test->ifobj_rx->umem->frame_size = size;
+}
+
+static void test_spec_set_frame_headroom(struct test_spec *test, u32 size)
+{
+ test->ifobj_rx->umem->frame_headroom = size;
+}
+
static void test_spec_set_xdp_prog(struct test_spec *test, struct bpf_program *xdp_prog_rx,
struct bpf_program *xdp_prog_tx, struct bpf_map *xskmap_rx,
struct bpf_map *xskmap_tx)
@@ -1953,7 +1969,7 @@ int testapp_xdp_prog_cleanup(struct test_spec *test)
int testapp_headroom(struct test_spec *test)
{
- test->ifobj_rx->umem->frame_headroom = UMEM_HEADROOM_TEST_SIZE;
+ test_spec_set_frame_headroom(test, UMEM_HEADROOM_TEST_SIZE);
return testapp_validate_traffic(test);
}
@@ -1968,8 +1984,8 @@ int testapp_stats_rx_dropped(struct test_spec *test)
if (pkt_stream_replace_half(test, (MIN_PKT_SIZE * 3) + umem_tr, 0))
return TEST_FAILURE;
- test->ifobj_rx->umem->frame_headroom = test->ifobj_rx->umem->frame_size -
- XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM - (MIN_PKT_SIZE * 2) - umem_tr;
+ test_spec_set_frame_headroom(test, test->ifobj_rx->umem->frame_size -
+ XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM - (MIN_PKT_SIZE * 2) - umem_tr);
if (pkt_stream_receive_half(test))
return TEST_FAILURE;
test->ifobj_rx->validation_func = validate_rx_dropped;
@@ -2025,8 +2041,7 @@ int testapp_stats_fill_empty(struct test_spec *test)
int testapp_send_receive_unaligned(struct test_spec *test)
{
- test->ifobj_tx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
- test->ifobj_rx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
+ test_spec_set_unaligned(test);
/* Let half of the packets straddle a 4K buffer boundary */
if (pkt_stream_replace_half(test, MIN_PKT_SIZE, -MIN_PKT_SIZE / 2))
return TEST_FAILURE;
@@ -2037,8 +2052,7 @@ int testapp_send_receive_unaligned(struct test_spec *test)
int testapp_send_receive_unaligned_mb(struct test_spec *test)
{
test->mtu = MAX_ETH_JUMBO_SIZE;
- test->ifobj_tx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
- test->ifobj_rx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
+ test_spec_set_unaligned(test);
if (pkt_stream_replace(test, DEFAULT_PKT_CNT, MAX_ETH_JUMBO_SIZE))
return TEST_FAILURE;
return testapp_validate_traffic(test);
@@ -2204,7 +2218,7 @@ int testapp_poll_txq_tmout(struct test_spec *test)
{
test->ifobj_tx->use_poll = true;
/* create invalid frame by set umem frame_size and pkt length equal to 2048 */
- test->ifobj_tx->umem->frame_size = 2048;
+ test_spec_set_frame_size(test, 2048);
if (pkt_stream_replace(test, 2 * DEFAULT_PKT_CNT, 2048))
return TEST_FAILURE;
return testapp_validate_traffic_single_thread(test, test->ifobj_tx);
@@ -2337,8 +2351,7 @@ int testapp_send_receive(struct test_spec *test)
int testapp_send_receive_2k_frame(struct test_spec *test)
{
- test->ifobj_tx->umem->frame_size = 2048;
- test->ifobj_rx->umem->frame_size = 2048;
+ test_spec_set_frame_size(test, 2048);
if (pkt_stream_replace(test, DEFAULT_PKT_CNT, MIN_PKT_SIZE))
return TEST_FAILURE;
return testapp_validate_traffic(test);
@@ -2363,15 +2376,13 @@ int testapp_aligned_inv_desc(struct test_spec *test)
int testapp_aligned_inv_desc_2k_frame(struct test_spec *test)
{
- test->ifobj_tx->umem->frame_size = 2048;
- test->ifobj_rx->umem->frame_size = 2048;
+ test_spec_set_frame_size(test, 2048);
return testapp_invalid_desc(test);
}
int testapp_unaligned_inv_desc(struct test_spec *test)
{
- test->ifobj_tx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
- test->ifobj_rx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
+ test_spec_set_unaligned(test);
return testapp_invalid_desc(test);
}
@@ -2380,10 +2391,8 @@ int testapp_unaligned_inv_desc_4001_frame(struct test_spec *test)
u64 page_size, umem_size;
/* Odd frame size so the UMEM doesn't end near a page boundary. */
- test->ifobj_tx->umem->frame_size = 4001;
- test->ifobj_rx->umem->frame_size = 4001;
- test->ifobj_tx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
- test->ifobj_rx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
+ test_spec_set_frame_size(test, 4001);
+ test_spec_set_unaligned(test);
/* This test exists to test descriptors that staddle the end of
* the UMEM but not a page.
*/
@@ -2402,8 +2411,7 @@ int testapp_aligned_inv_desc_mb(struct test_spec *test)
int testapp_unaligned_inv_desc_mb(struct test_spec *test)
{
- test->ifobj_tx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
- test->ifobj_rx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
+ test_spec_set_unaligned(test);
return testapp_invalid_desc_mb(test);
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-28 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-28 8:03 [PATCH 0/5] selftests/xsk: foundational UMEM refactoring Tushar Vyavahare
2026-04-28 8:03 ` Tushar Vyavahare [this message]
2026-04-28 10:28 ` [PATCH 1/5] selftests/xsk: Introduce helpers for setting UMEM properties bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-28 12:39 ` Vyavahare, Tushar
2026-04-28 8:03 ` [PATCH 2/5] selftests/xsk: Eliminate umem reference from ifobject Tushar Vyavahare
2026-04-28 8:03 ` [PATCH 3/5] selftests/xsk: Remove umem from pkt_generate parameters Tushar Vyavahare
2026-04-28 8:03 ` [PATCH 4/5] selftests/xsk: Use umem_size() helper consistently Tushar Vyavahare
2026-04-28 8:03 ` [PATCH 5/5] selftests/xsk: Introduce mmap_size in umem struct Tushar Vyavahare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260428080317.702124-2-tushar.vyavahare@intel.com \
--to=tushar.vyavahare@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stfomichev@gmail.com \
--cc=tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox