From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Marc Harvey <marcharvey@google.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>, Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/mlx5: Add MLX5_VXLAN config option
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:01:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260429190150.417b0302@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANkEMgkBnuRfurKcFEUAZcJcX1XYSnHbBozZGP8DpnKq--tWbw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:46:36 -0700 Marc Harvey wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 6:46 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 28 Apr 2026 22:44:34 +0000 Marc Harvey wrote:
> > > Currently, there is no way to disable mlx5 vxlan offloading if vxlan
> > > is enabled. We've (possibly) seen some minor udp rr and udp stream
> > > regressions when enabling vxlan, and want a way to disable this
> > > offloading. Also coupling vxlan offloading with vxlan enablement
> > > generally limits the flexability of vxlan setups.
> > >
> > > Add a new config option for mlx5 vxlan offloading specifically, so
> > > that users can use vxlan without automatically opting in to the
> > > offloading.
> > >
> > > To keep the same behavior as before, the new config option is enabled
> > > by default if vxlan is enabled.
> >
> > Can we delay init of whatever makes the device slow down until the
> > first vxlan port is registered? A kconfig level optimization of this
> > sort will have rather limited applicability.
>
> There would still be the problem of wanting to use vxlan without vxlan
> offload. Agree that a kconfig might not be ideal, but it is currently
> guarded by a kconfig that offers no choice to opt out.
Are you aware of NETIF_F_RX_UDP_TUNNEL_PORT ?
I haven't checked it does exactly what we need, but I recall there was
a ethtool feature for this..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-30 2:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-28 22:44 [PATCH net-next] net/mlx5: Add MLX5_VXLAN config option Marc Harvey
2026-04-29 1:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-30 0:46 ` Marc Harvey
2026-04-30 2:01 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-05-04 22:44 ` Marc Harvey
2026-05-05 1:10 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-05 6:21 ` Gal Pressman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260429190150.417b0302@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcharvey@google.com \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox