public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, sd@queasysnail.net,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>, 钱一铭 <yimingqian591@gmail.com>,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, jonathan.lemon@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH net 4/7] net: tls: fix off-by-one in sg_chain entry count for wrapped sk_msg ring
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:29:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260429222944.2139041-5-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260429222944.2139041-1-kuba@kernel.org>

When an sk_msg scatterlist ring wraps (sg.end < sg.start),
tls_push_record() chains the tail portion of the ring to the head
using sg_chain(). The entry count passed to sg_chain() determines
where the chain pointer is written: at prv[prv_nents - 1].

The current code uses MAX_SKB_FRAGS (17) as the ring size:

    sg_chain(&msg_pl->sg.data[msg_pl->sg.start],
             MAX_SKB_FRAGS - msg_pl->sg.start + 1,
             msg_pl->sg.data);

This places the chain pointer at data[start + (MAX_SKB_FRAGS - start
+ 1) - 1] = data[MAX_SKB_FRAGS] = data[17]. However, since commit
031097d9e079 ("bpf: sk_msg, zap ingress queue on psock down") expanded
the ring from MAX_MSG_FRAGS to NR_MSG_FRAG_IDS (18) positions,
data[17] is a valid ring slot that can hold live scatterlist entries.
The chain pointer must land at data[NR_MSG_FRAG_IDS] (index 18), the
reserved chaining slot.

Every other wrapped-ring arithmetic operation in the sk_msg subsystem
(sk_msg_iter_dist, sk_msg_iter_var_next, sk_msg_iter_var_prev,
bpf_msg_pull_data) correctly uses NR_MSG_FRAG_IDS as the ring modulus.
This sg_chain call is the sole remaining use of MAX_SKB_FRAGS for
ring-modulus arithmetic and was introduced after the ring expansion.

Reported-by: 钱一铭 <yimingqian591@gmail.com>
Fixes: 9aaaa56845a0 ("bpf: Sockmap/tls, skmsg can have wrapped skmsg that needs extra chaining")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
CC: john.fastabend@gmail.com
CC: sd@queasysnail.net
CC: daniel@iogearbox.net
CC: jonathan.lemon@gmail.com
CC: bpf@vger.kernel.org
---
 net/tls/tls_sw.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
index 906a1998c630..600e13effaab 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -802,7 +802,7 @@ static int tls_push_record(struct sock *sk, int flags,
 
 	if (msg_pl->sg.end < msg_pl->sg.start) {
 		sg_chain(&msg_pl->sg.data[msg_pl->sg.start],
-			 MAX_SKB_FRAGS - msg_pl->sg.start + 1,
+			 NR_MSG_FRAG_IDS - msg_pl->sg.start + 1,
 			 msg_pl->sg.data);
 	}
 
-- 
2.54.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-29 22:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-29 22:29 [PATCH net 0/7] net: tls: fix a few random bugs Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-29 22:29 ` [PATCH net 1/7] net: tls: fix silent data drop under pipe back-pressure Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-29 22:29 ` [PATCH net 2/7] selftests: tls: add test for data loss on small pipe Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-29 22:29 ` [PATCH net 3/7] net: tls: fix page pin leak on sendpage_ok() failure Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-29 22:29 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-05-01 16:40   ` [PATCH net 4/7] net: tls: fix off-by-one in sg_chain entry count for wrapped sk_msg ring Sabrina Dubroca
2026-05-03  1:26     ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-29 22:29 ` [PATCH net 5/7] selftests: bpf: cover wrapped sk_msg ring chaining in ktls TX path Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-30 17:58   ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-04-29 22:29 ` [PATCH net 6/7] net: tls: fix use-after-free in tls_sw_sendmsg_locked after bpf verdict Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-30 17:50   ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-04-29 22:29 ` [PATCH net 7/7] selftests: bpf: cover tls_sw_sendmsg UAF after bpf_exec_tx_verdict split Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-30 17:55   ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-05-03  2:20 ` [PATCH net 0/7] net: tls: fix a few random bugs patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260429222944.2139041-5-kuba@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
    --cc=yimingqian591@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox