From: Daniel Zahka <daniel.zahka@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net 2/3] netdevsim: psp: serialize calls to nsim_psp_uninit()
Date: Tue, 05 May 2026 03:42:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260505-psd-rcu-v1-2-a8f69ec1ab96@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260505-psd-rcu-v1-0-a8f69ec1ab96@gmail.com>
The debugfs write handler, nsim_psp_rereg_write(), can race against
nsim_destroy() and against itself, causing nsim_psp_uninit() to run
more than once concurrently. Two complementary changes serialize all
callers:
1. Delete the psp_rereg debugfs file from nsim_psp_uninit() before
doing the actual teardown. debugfs_remove() drains any in-flight
writers and prevents new ones from starting.
2. Add a mutex around the body of nsim_psp_rereg_write() so that two
concurrent userspace writers cannot both enter the teardown path
at once.
The teardown work itself is moved into a new __nsim_psp_uninit() that
the rereg handler calls under the mutex, while the public
nsim_psp_uninit() wraps it with the debugfs_remove()/mutex_destroy()
pair so nsim_destroy() doesn't have to know about the psp internals.
Fixes: f857478d6206 ("netdevsim: a basic test PSP implementation")
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.6
Signed-off-by: Daniel Zahka <daniel.zahka@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h | 2 ++
drivers/net/netdevsim/psp.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h b/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h
index 7e129dddbbe7..e373ffc26b0c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h
+++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h
@@ -121,6 +121,8 @@ struct netdevsim {
u64_stats_t tx_bytes;
struct u64_stats_sync syncp;
struct psp_dev *dev;
+ struct dentry *rereg;
+ struct mutex rereg_lock;
u32 spi;
u32 assoc_cnt;
} psp;
diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/psp.c b/drivers/net/netdevsim/psp.c
index 0b4d717253b0..86d84b7e566b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/psp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/psp.c
@@ -209,13 +209,20 @@ static struct psp_dev_caps nsim_psp_caps = {
.assoc_drv_spc = sizeof(void *),
};
-void nsim_psp_uninit(struct netdevsim *ns)
+static void __nsim_psp_uninit(struct netdevsim *ns)
{
if (!IS_ERR(ns->psp.dev))
psp_dev_unregister(ns->psp.dev);
WARN_ON(ns->psp.assoc_cnt);
}
+void nsim_psp_uninit(struct netdevsim *ns)
+{
+ debugfs_remove(ns->psp.rereg);
+ mutex_destroy(&ns->psp.rereg_lock);
+ __nsim_psp_uninit(ns);
+}
+
static ssize_t
nsim_psp_rereg_write(struct file *file, const char __user *data, size_t count,
loff_t *ppos)
@@ -223,11 +230,13 @@ nsim_psp_rereg_write(struct file *file, const char __user *data, size_t count,
struct netdevsim *ns = file->private_data;
int err;
- nsim_psp_uninit(ns);
+ mutex_lock(&ns->psp.rereg_lock);
+ __nsim_psp_uninit(ns);
ns->psp.dev = psp_dev_create(ns->netdev, &nsim_psp_ops,
&nsim_psp_caps, ns);
err = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(ns->psp.dev);
+ mutex_unlock(&ns->psp.rereg_lock);
return err ?: count;
}
@@ -249,6 +258,8 @@ int nsim_psp_init(struct netdevsim *ns)
if (err)
return err;
- debugfs_create_file("psp_rereg", 0200, ddir, ns, &nsim_psp_rereg_fops);
+ mutex_init(&ns->psp.rereg_lock);
+ ns->psp.rereg = debugfs_create_file("psp_rereg", 0200, ddir, ns,
+ &nsim_psp_rereg_fops);
return 0;
}
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-05 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-05 10:42 [PATCH net 0/3] netdevsim: psp: fix init and uninit bugs Daniel Zahka
2026-05-05 10:42 ` [PATCH net 1/3] netdevsim: psp: only call nsim_psp_uninit() on PFs Daniel Zahka
2026-05-05 10:42 ` Daniel Zahka [this message]
2026-05-05 10:42 ` [PATCH net 3/3] netdevsim: psp: rcu protect psp_dev reference Daniel Zahka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260505-psd-rcu-v1-2-a8f69ec1ab96@gmail.com \
--to=daniel.zahka@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox