From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 7/8] xfrm: defensively unhash xfrm_state lists in __xfrm_state_delete
Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 15:23:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260505132326.1362733-8-steffen.klassert@secunet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260505132326.1362733-1-steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
From: Michal Kosiorek <mkosiorek121@gmail.com>
KASAN reproduces a slab-use-after-free in __xfrm_state_delete()'s
hlist_del_rcu calls under syzkaller load on linux-6.12.y stable
(reproduced on 6.12.47, also reachable via the same code path on
torvalds/master and on the ipsec tree). Nine unique signatures cluster
in the xfrm_state lifecycle, the load-bearing one being:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __hlist_del include/linux/list.h:990 [inline]
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in hlist_del_rcu include/linux/rculist.h:516 [inline]
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __xfrm_state_delete net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
Write of size 8 at addr ffff8881198bcb70 by task kworker/u8:9/435
Workqueue: netns cleanup_net
Call Trace:
__hlist_del / hlist_del_rcu
__xfrm_state_delete
xfrm_state_delete
xfrm_state_flush
xfrm_state_fini
ops_exit_list
cleanup_net
The other observed signatures hit the same slab object from
__xfrm_state_lookup, xfrm_alloc_spi, __xfrm_state_insert and an OOB
write variant of __xfrm_state_delete, all on the byseq/byspi
hash chains.
__xfrm_state_delete() guards its byseq and byspi unhashes with
value-based predicates:
if (x->km.seq)
hlist_del_rcu(&x->byseq);
if (x->id.spi)
hlist_del_rcu(&x->byspi);
while everywhere else in the file (e.g. state_cache, state_cache_input)
the safer hlist_unhashed() check is used. xfrm_alloc_spi() sets
x->id.spi = newspi inside xfrm_state_lock and then immediately inserts
into byspi, but a path that observes x->id.spi != 0 outside of
xfrm_state_lock can still skip-or-hit the byspi unhash inconsistently
with whether x is actually on the list. The same holds for x->km.seq
versus byseq, and the bydst/bysrc unhashes have no predicate at all,
so a second __xfrm_state_delete() on the same object writes through
LIST_POISON pprev.
The defensive change here:
- Use hlist_del_init_rcu() instead of hlist_del_rcu() on bydst,
bysrc, byseq and byspi so a second deletion is a no-op rather
than a write through LIST_POISON pprev. The byseq/byspi nodes
are already initialised in xfrm_state_alloc().
- Test hlist_unhashed() rather than the value predicate for
byseq/byspi, so the unhash decision tracks list state rather than
mutable scalar fields.
Empirical verification: applied this patch on top of v6.12.47, rebuilt,
and re-ran the same syzkaller harness for 1h16m on a previously-crashy
configuration that produced ~100 hits each of slab-use-after-free
Read in xfrm_alloc_spi / Read in __xfrm_state_lookup / Write in
__xfrm_state_delete. After the patch, 7.1M execs across 32 VMs at
~1550 exec/sec produced zero xfrm_state UAF/OOB hits. /proc/slabinfo
confirms the xfrm_state slab is actively allocated and freed during
the run (~143 KiB resident), so the fuzzer is still exercising those
code paths -- they just no longer crash.
Reproduction:
- Linux 6.12.47 x86_64 + KASAN_GENERIC + KASAN_INLINE + KCOV
- syzkaller @ 746545b8b1e4c3a128db8652b340d3df90ce61db
- 32 QEMU/KVM VMs x 2 vCPU on AWS c5.metal bare metal
- 9 unique signatures collected in ~9h, all within xfrm_state
lifecycle
Fixes: fe9f1d8779cb ("xfrm: add state hashtable keyed by seq")
Fixes: 7b4dc3600e48 ("[XFRM]: Do not add a state whose SPI is zero to the SPI hash.")
Reported-by: Michal Kosiorek <mkosiorek121@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Michal Kosiorek <mkosiorek121@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Kosiorek <mkosiorek121@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
index 1748d374abca..686014d39429 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
@@ -818,17 +818,17 @@ int __xfrm_state_delete(struct xfrm_state *x)
spin_lock(&net->xfrm.xfrm_state_lock);
list_del(&x->km.all);
- hlist_del_rcu(&x->bydst);
- hlist_del_rcu(&x->bysrc);
- if (x->km.seq)
- hlist_del_rcu(&x->byseq);
+ hlist_del_init_rcu(&x->bydst);
+ hlist_del_init_rcu(&x->bysrc);
+ if (!hlist_unhashed(&x->byseq))
+ hlist_del_init_rcu(&x->byseq);
if (!hlist_unhashed(&x->state_cache))
hlist_del_rcu(&x->state_cache);
if (!hlist_unhashed(&x->state_cache_input))
hlist_del_rcu(&x->state_cache_input);
- if (x->id.spi)
- hlist_del_rcu(&x->byspi);
+ if (!hlist_unhashed(&x->byspi))
+ hlist_del_init_rcu(&x->byspi);
net->xfrm.state_num--;
xfrm_nat_keepalive_state_updated(x);
spin_unlock(&net->xfrm.xfrm_state_lock);
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-05 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-05 13:22 [PATCH 0/8] pull request (net): ipsec 2026-05-05 Steffen Klassert
2026-05-05 13:22 ` [PATCH 1/8] ipv6: xfrm6: release dst on error in xfrm6_rcv_encap() Steffen Klassert
2026-05-05 13:22 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfrm: ah: account for ESN high bits in async callbacks Steffen Klassert
2026-05-05 13:22 ` [PATCH 3/8] tools/selftests: Use a sensible timeout value for iperf3 client Steffen Klassert
2026-05-05 13:23 ` [PATCH 4/8] tools/selftests: Add a VXLAN+IPsec traffic test Steffen Klassert
2026-05-05 13:23 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfrm: Don't clobber inner headers when already set Steffen Klassert
2026-05-05 13:23 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfrm: provide message size for XFRM_MSG_MAPPING Steffen Klassert
2026-05-05 13:23 ` Steffen Klassert [this message]
2026-05-05 13:23 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfrm: esp: avoid in-place decrypt on shared skb frags Steffen Klassert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260505132326.1362733-8-steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--to=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox