From: Ankit Jain <ankit-aj.jain@broadcom.com>
To: edumazet@google.com
Cc: kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
pabeni@redhat.com, ncardwell@google.com, kuniyu@google.com,
horms@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, quic_subashab@quicinc.com,
quic_stranche@quicinc.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, karen.badiryan@broadcom.com,
ajay.kaher@broadcom.com, alexey.makhalov@broadcom.com,
vamsi-krishna.brahmajosyula@broadcom.com, yin.ding@broadcom.com,
tapas.kundu@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/2] tcp: protect locked SO_RCVBUF from Silly Window Syndrome
Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 18:19:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260505181919.15308-1-ankit-aj.jain@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iKcaOK6rrY=m0SVfXdx3jTRXCE3T+jNQpw434UZ8oxtpw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Eric,
Thanks for the review and suggestion.
> Testing tp->advmss is not doing what you want I think.
>
> A remote peer can send GRO packets with tiny segments, regardless of
> tp->advmss
>
> If GRO is what you are looking for, why not testing (skb->len > len) ?
I tested your suggested `skb->len > len` logic on our reproduction
setup. It works perfectly and the 504 timeouts are completely resolved.
Thanks,
Ankit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-05 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-04 14:49 [PATCH net v2 0/2] tcp: protect locked SO_RCVBUF from Silly Window Syndrome Ankit Jain
2026-05-04 14:49 ` [PATCH net v2 1/2] " Ankit Jain
2026-05-04 16:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-05-05 18:19 ` Ankit Jain [this message]
2026-05-04 14:49 ` [PATCH net v2 2/2] selftests/net: add packetdrill test for locked SO_RCVBUF SWS Ankit Jain
2026-05-04 16:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-05-05 18:23 ` Ankit Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260505181919.15308-1-ankit-aj.jain@broadcom.com \
--to=ankit-aj.jain@broadcom.com \
--cc=ajay.kaher@broadcom.com \
--cc=alexey.makhalov@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=karen.badiryan@broadcom.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=quic_stranche@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_subashab@quicinc.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tapas.kundu@broadcom.com \
--cc=vamsi-krishna.brahmajosyula@broadcom.com \
--cc=yin.ding@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox