From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, horms@kernel.org, petrm@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] net: Fix protodown with macvlan
Date: Wed, 6 May 2026 23:39:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260506203949.GA805568@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260505081656.463158-1-idosch@nvidia.com>
On Tue, May 05, 2026 at 11:16:52AM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> When protodown is enabled on a macvlan, two bugs cause the macvlan to
> incorrectly report an UP operational state:
>
> 1. Toggling the lower device's carrier while protodown is enabled on the
> macvlan causes the macvlan to inherit the UP operational state,
> effectively bypassing the protodown mechanism.
>
> 2. Toggling protodown on and then off on the macvlan while the lower
> device has no carrier causes the macvlan to report UP instead of
> LOWERLAYERDOWN, since netif_change_proto_down() unconditionally turns
> the carrier on.
>
> Patch #1 solves the first problem by making
> netif_stacked_transfer_operstate() return early when protodown is on.
>
> Patch #2 solves the second problem by calling
> netif_stacked_transfer_operstate() instead of netif_carrier_on() when
> protodown is disabled on a net device that has a linked net device.
>
> Patch #3 adds a selftest covering both bugs and the basic protodown
> functionality.
>
> Targeting at net-next since these are not regressions (i.e., never
> worked).
>
> Note that while these changes are in the core, they should only affect
> macvlan as protodown is only supported by macvlan and vxlan and only the
> former has a linked net device.
>
> v2:
> - Move protodown handling away from drivers to the core (Jakub).
> - Add a new test case for vxlan.
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260429124624.835335-1-idosch@nvidia.com/
I thought about this again and since protodown is only about carrier, I
think it's best to avoid netif_stacked_transfer_operstate(). Instead,
make netif_carrier_on() a NOP when protodown is turned on and when
protodown is turned off, only turn on the carrier if the linked net
device (assuming it exists) also has a carrier.
IOW, I will make these changes for v3:
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 46f8a2efd982..0c272f6e9aaa 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -10169,10 +10169,8 @@ int netif_change_proto_down(struct net_device *dev, bool proto_down)
WRITE_ONCE(dev->proto_down, proto_down);
if (proto_down)
netif_carrier_off(dev);
- else if (dev == iflink_dev)
+ else if (dev == iflink_dev || netif_carrier_ok(iflink_dev))
netif_carrier_on(dev);
- else
- netif_stacked_transfer_operstate(iflink_dev, dev);
return 0;
}
@@ -11134,9 +11132,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_change_features);
void netif_stacked_transfer_operstate(const struct net_device *rootdev,
struct net_device *dev)
{
- if (dev->proto_down)
- return;
-
if (rootdev->operstate == IF_OPER_DORMANT)
netif_dormant_on(dev);
else
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_generic.c b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
index a93321db8fd7..05c250c483f0 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_generic.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
@@ -609,6 +609,9 @@ static void netdev_watchdog_down(struct net_device *dev)
*/
void netif_carrier_on(struct net_device *dev)
{
+ if (READ_ONCE(dev->proto_down))
+ return;
+
if (test_and_clear_bit(__LINK_STATE_NOCARRIER, &dev->state)) {
if (dev->reg_state == NETREG_UNINITIALIZED)
return;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-06 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-05 8:16 [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] net: Fix protodown with macvlan Ido Schimmel
2026-05-05 8:16 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net: Do not inherit operational state when protodown is on Ido Schimmel
2026-05-05 8:16 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: Do not unconditionally turn on carrier when turning off protodown Ido Schimmel
2026-05-05 8:16 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] selftests: net: Add protodown tests Ido Schimmel
2026-05-06 20:39 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260506203949.GA805568@shredder \
--to=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox