From: Allison Henderson <achender@kernel.org>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
achender@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
shuah@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v1 3/3] selftests: rds: Disarm signal alarm on test completion
Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 16:32:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260507233213.556182-4-achender@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260507233213.556182-1-achender@kernel.org>
A race in stop_pcaps is possible if the test completes and then
times out while waiting for the tcpdump process to exit. The
signal handler may fire again and needlessly call stop_pcap a
second time. Fix this by disabling the alarm after normal
test completion.
Also if there are no tcpdump processes to wait on, stop_pcaps can
just exit. This avoids misleading prints when there are no procs
to collect dumps from.
Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson <achender@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/net/rds/test.py | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/rds/test.py b/tools/testing/selftests/net/rds/test.py
index e1813e43fb4e..6db606779231 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/rds/test.py
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/rds/test.py
@@ -77,6 +77,10 @@ def stop_pcaps():
completes after the signal handler is fired. List will be empty
if logdir is not set
"""
+
+ if not tcpdump_procs:
+ return
+
ksft_pr("Stopping network packet captures")
while tcpdump_procs:
proc = tcpdump_procs.pop()
@@ -279,6 +283,10 @@ for s in sockets:
pass
ksft_pr(f"getsockopt(): {nr_success}/{nr_error}")
+
+# cancel timeout
+signal.alarm(0)
+
stop_pcaps()
# We're done sending and receiving stuff, now let's check if what
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-07 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-07 23:32 [PATCH net-next v1 0/3] Log clean up and TAP follow ups Allison Henderson
2026-05-07 23:32 ` [PATCH net-next v1 1/3] selftests: rds: Fix stale log clean up Allison Henderson
2026-05-07 23:32 ` [PATCH net-next v1 2/3] selftests: rds: Fix TAP-prefixed prints in check_gcov* Allison Henderson
2026-05-07 23:32 ` Allison Henderson [this message]
2026-05-10 17:30 ` [PATCH net-next v1 0/3] Log clean up and TAP follow ups patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260507233213.556182-4-achender@kernel.org \
--to=achender@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox