From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Jiakai Xu <xujiakai24@mails.ucas.ac.cn>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Jiakai Xu <xujiakai24@mails.ucas.ac.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netdevsim: Fix task hung by releasing bus lock before device ops
Date: Sun, 10 May 2026 13:18:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202605101358.RCmpCsFR-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260509092837.3432281-1-xujiakai24@mails.ucas.ac.cn>
Hi Jiakai,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v7.1-rc2 next-20260508]
[cannot apply to horms-ipvs/master]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jiakai-Xu/netdevsim-Fix-task-hung-by-releasing-bus-lock-before-device-ops/20260510-070550
base: linus/master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260509092837.3432281-1-xujiakai24%40mails.ucas.ac.cn
patch subject: [PATCH] netdevsim: Fix task hung by releasing bus lock before device ops
config: hexagon-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260510/202605101358.RCmpCsFR-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6009708b4367171ccdbf4b5905cb6a803753fe18)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260510/202605101358.RCmpCsFR-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202605101358.RCmpCsFR-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/net/netdevsim/bus.c:192:3: error: call to undeclared function 'nsim_bus_dev_del'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
192 | nsim_bus_dev_del(nsim_bus_dev);
| ^
drivers/net/netdevsim/bus.c:192:3: note: did you mean 'nsim_bus_dev_new'?
drivers/net/netdevsim/bus.c:156:1: note: 'nsim_bus_dev_new' declared here
156 | nsim_bus_dev_new(unsigned int id, unsigned int port_count, unsigned int num_queues);
| ^
>> drivers/net/netdevsim/bus.c:206:13: error: conflicting types for 'nsim_bus_dev_del'
206 | static void nsim_bus_dev_del(struct nsim_bus_dev *nsim_bus_dev);
| ^
drivers/net/netdevsim/bus.c:192:3: note: previous implicit declaration is here
192 | nsim_bus_dev_del(nsim_bus_dev);
| ^
2 errors generated.
vim +/nsim_bus_dev_del +192 drivers/net/netdevsim/bus.c
157
158 static ssize_t
159 new_device_store(const struct bus_type *bus, const char *buf, size_t count)
160 {
161 unsigned int id, port_count, num_queues;
162 struct nsim_bus_dev *nsim_bus_dev;
163 int err;
164
165 err = sscanf(buf, "%u %u %u", &id, &port_count, &num_queues);
166 switch (err) {
167 case 1:
168 port_count = 1;
169 fallthrough;
170 case 2:
171 num_queues = 1;
172 fallthrough;
173 case 3:
174 if (id > INT_MAX) {
175 pr_err("Value of \"id\" is too big.\n");
176 return -EINVAL;
177 }
178 break;
179 default:
180 pr_err("Format for adding new device is \"id port_count num_queues\" (uint uint uint).\n");
181 return -EINVAL;
182 }
183
184 nsim_bus_dev = nsim_bus_dev_new(id, port_count, num_queues);
185 if (IS_ERR(nsim_bus_dev))
186 return PTR_ERR(nsim_bus_dev);
187
188 mutex_lock(&nsim_bus_dev_list_lock);
189 /* Prevent to use resource before initialization. */
190 if (!smp_load_acquire(&nsim_bus_enable)) {
191 mutex_unlock(&nsim_bus_dev_list_lock);
> 192 nsim_bus_dev_del(nsim_bus_dev);
193 return -EBUSY;
194 }
195
196 /* Allow using nsim_bus_dev */
197 smp_store_release(&nsim_bus_dev->init, true);
198
199 list_add_tail(&nsim_bus_dev->list, &nsim_bus_dev_list);
200 mutex_unlock(&nsim_bus_dev_list_lock);
201
202 return count;
203 }
204 static BUS_ATTR_WO(new_device);
205
> 206 static void nsim_bus_dev_del(struct nsim_bus_dev *nsim_bus_dev);
207
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-10 5:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-09 9:28 [PATCH] netdevsim: Fix task hung by releasing bus lock before device ops Jiakai Xu
2026-05-09 9:33 ` Jiakai Xu
2026-05-10 3:03 ` kernel test robot
2026-05-10 5:18 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2026-05-10 5:41 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202605101358.RCmpCsFR-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=xujiakai24@mails.ucas.ac.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox