From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: jelonek.jonas@gmail.com
Cc: 'Simon Horman' <horms@kernel.org>,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, andrew@lunn.ch, hkallweit1@gmail.com,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bjorn@mork.no
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 1/2] net: sfp: apply I2C adapter quirks to limit block size
Date: Sun, 10 May 2026 17:47:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260510164726.1401317-1-horms@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260507093301.1144740-2-jelonek.jonas@gmail.com>
From: 'Simon Horman' <horms@kernel.org>
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
Full review at: https://sashiko.dev
---
net: sfp: apply I2C adapter quirks to limit block size
This commit limits the SFP I2C block size based on the I2C adapter's
max_read_len and max_write_len quirks.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -807,21 +807,29 @@ static int sfp_smbus_byte_write(struct sfp *sfp, bool a2, u8 dev_addr,
>
> static int sfp_i2c_configure(struct sfp *sfp, struct i2c_adapter *i2c)
> {
[ ... ]
> + if (i2c->quirks && i2c->quirks->max_read_len)
> + max_block_size = min(max_block_size, i2c->quirks->max_read_len);
> + if (i2c->quirks && i2c->quirks->max_write_len)
> + max_block_size = min(max_block_size, i2c->quirks->max_write_len);
Does applying max_write_len to max_block_size inadvertently throttle reads
and break hardware monitoring?
The max_block_size dictates sfp->i2c_max_block_size, which subsequently sets
sfp->i2c_block_size. This block size is exclusively used by sfp_i2c_read()
to chunk read transfers. The write message in a chunked sfp_i2c_read()
operation is always exactly 1 byte (the register address), irrespective of
the read payload size. Restricting the read chunk size based on
max_write_len appears to cause unintended side effects.
If an adapter has a max_write_len of 1, the i2c_block_size becomes 1. This
forces 1-byte read chunking and explicitly skips hwmon device registration
since sfp_hwmon_probe() requires an i2c_block_size >= 2.
Will this change actually protect writes against the max_write_len quirk?
Looking at sfp_i2c_write(), it ignores sfp->i2c_block_size and does not
implement chunking. It unconditionally allocates 1 + len bytes and submits
a single i2c_msg. Any write where 1 + len > max_write_len will still be
rejected by the I2C core.
> +
> + sfp->i2c_max_block_size = max_block_size;
> return 0;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-10 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-07 9:32 [PATCH net-next v7 0/2] net: sfp: extend SMBus support Jonas Jelonek
2026-05-07 9:33 ` [PATCH net-next v7 1/2] net: sfp: apply I2C adapter quirks to limit block size Jonas Jelonek
2026-05-10 16:47 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2026-05-07 9:33 ` [PATCH net-next v7 2/2] net: sfp: extend SMBus support Jonas Jelonek
2026-05-07 20:45 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-05-10 16:47 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260510164726.1401317-1-horms@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bjorn@mork.no \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=jelonek.jonas@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox