From: Polina Vishneva <polina.vishneva@virtuozzo.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Stefano Garzarella" <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Polina Vishneva" <polina.vishneva@virtuozzo.com>,
"Denis V . Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
Subject: [PATCH] vhost/vsock: Refuse the connection immediately when guest isn't ready
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 16:56:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260511145610.413210-1-polina.vishneva@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
From: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
When the host initiates an AF_VSOCK connect() to a guest that has not
yet loaded the virtio-vsock transport (i.e. still booting), the caller
blocks for VSOCK_DEFAULT_CONNECT_TIMEOUT (2 seconds), because
vhost_transport_do_send_pkt() silently exits when
vhost_vq_get_backend(vq) returns NULL.
If the guest doesn't start listening within this timeout, connect()
returns ETIMEDOUT.
This delay is usually pointless and it doesn't well align with our
behavior at other initialization stages: for example, if a connection is
attempted when the guest driver is already loaded, but when nothing is
listening yet, it returns ECONNRESET immediately without any wait.
Fix this by checking the RX virtqueue backend in
vhost_transport_send_pkt() before queuing. If the backend is NULL,
return -ECONNREFUSED immediately.
Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Co-developed-by: Polina Vishneva <polina.vishneva@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Polina Vishneva <polina.vishneva@virtuozzo.com>
---
drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
index 1d8ec6bed53e..a3f218292c3a 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
@@ -302,6 +302,16 @@ vhost_transport_send_pkt(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net *net)
return -ENODEV;
}
+ /* Fast-fail if the guest hasn't enabled the RX vq yet. Reading
+ * private_data without vq->mutex is deliberate: even if the backend becomes
+ * NULL right after that check, do_send_pkt() checks it under the mutex.
+ */
+ if (!data_race(READ_ONCE(vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_RX].private_data))) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ kfree_skb(skb);
+ return -ECONNREFUSED;
+ }
+
if (virtio_vsock_skb_reply(skb))
atomic_inc(&vsock->queued_replies);
base-commit: 8ab992f815d6736b5c7a6f5fd7bfe7bc106bb3dc
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-05-11 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-11 14:56 Polina Vishneva [this message]
2026-05-11 15:56 ` [PATCH] vhost/vsock: Refuse the connection immediately when guest isn't ready Stefano Garzarella
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260511145610.413210-1-polina.vishneva@virtuozzo.com \
--to=polina.vishneva@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=den@openvz.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox