From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 719FE3672BB; Wed, 13 May 2026 01:24:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778635483; cv=none; b=tH794gNCsggUXPkk1B/V2vyywW4yvDCFXdn8T0Y80L8lFyT3tiV7/b5tEhIhjzP9k/kPVLCATHoZSrze3NdpiIr3Bzm2zZ1VvlLsLKsNjgvdBGQE1LCp1Uh2jnQFYt2GITUXRyhk6Pn5io3Y/z8a8Ndg3n/eaIIYgRrcOWCw5tA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778635483; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+3yqjEDXPw+arLfZzIDfpVm0xM+O5B1A5w8icx+stt0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=hs1Z3B1LaNu/azJCi4lf9EsDgHEqjbroX4ve4VegfnGFQx6Sa+rnh5SLlQQWNxB9Ih7UvdEHljYDxVkxTkAqdIrwE49pE0CWjEjUWH1pNJpynCKpv4O8lmf4p5yF7/a6KXMpFEs4XKOOkxt4lht3FIGN5vS49mFXqCTAHn7dJqI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=rI5/w58U; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="rI5/w58U" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA712C2BCB0; Wed, 13 May 2026 01:24:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1778635482; bh=+3yqjEDXPw+arLfZzIDfpVm0xM+O5B1A5w8icx+stt0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=rI5/w58Ucq1MiOJ6Wmed0khguvxV5L6MzUbCZaNowdBjxSTdwgGAeMzD1codYXjEo bi9Pty8h9bpbfUORD9OX+ZLfQrdbLelfCavgn8E8CX/+Zl3I4lXn1UBrmlLfnQR2rY f65j687qggwCPVLL3iKrccf62jH+/Cpa/Ibt5yEWzmIiY7lV4aTCjeDs9VY1JxPzvw oVM5tPLiGh02NFJmwS4LvEYeIxrUv9h/1albdMCf726wWdWo1OX4l8NEAMts4exoGM UHsGoe5zv3mZrLnuXYWiAuMlmSVs/Y4XB2rvlewcE28XBKu6Gx5JgHF1R0BqhPpXSM jz0ntrTItzWyw== Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 18:24:40 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: "Chuck Lever" Cc: "Sabrina Dubroca" , "John Fastabend" , "Eric Dumazet" , "Simon Horman" , "Paolo Abeni" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev, "Chuck Lever" , "Sagi Grimberg" Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v10 3/7] tls: Re-present partially-consumed records in tls_sw_read_sock() Message-ID: <20260512182440.70cf8b03@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20260511-tls-read-sock-v10-0-279fc5015f0e@oracle.com> <20260511-tls-read-sock-v10-3-279fc5015f0e@oracle.com> <20260512171715.078b49cf@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 12 May 2026 21:11:39 -0400 Chuck Lever wrote: > > If so a more appropriate direction would be to say that in > > the commit message and drop the Fixes tag. =20 >=20 > I=E2=80=99ll drop the Fixes: tag and route 2/7 and 3/7 through net-next. >=20 > Note that 7/7 in this series also bears a Fixes: tag. Should > that one go through net instead? That one looks like net material. Wouldn't be better off passing bool copied into tls_rx_rec_wait() and calling sock_error() conditionally than retroactively consume the error in the caller?