From: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>,
Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
dev@openvswitch.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>
Subject: [PATCH net] openvswitch: vport: fix race between linking and the device notifier
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 11:54:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260513095541.2010516-1-i.maximets@ovn.org> (raw)
Sashiko reports that it is technically possible that we got the device
reference, but by the time we're linking it to the OVS datapath, it
may be already in the process of being deleted. In this case if the
notifier wins the race for RTNL, it will see that the device is not
yet in the OVS datapath (ovs_netdev_get_vport() will fail in the
dp_device_event()) and will do nothing. Then the ovs_netdev_link()
will take the RTNL and link the unregistering device to OVS datapath.
Eventually, netdev_wait_allrefs_any() will re-broadcast the event and
the device will be properly detached, but it will take at least a
second before that happens, so it's not something we should rely on.
Let's avoid linking the non-registered device in the first place.
Note: As per documentation, RTNL doesn't protect the reg_state, but
it actually does for all the state transitions we care about here,
so it should not be necessary to use READ_ONCE or taking the instance
lock. We can still do that, but we have a few more places even in
this file where the reg_state is accessed without those while under
RTNL, and many more places like this across the kernel code, so it
might make more sense to change all of them in a more centralized
fashion in the future, if necessary.
Fixes: ccb1352e76cf ("net: Add Open vSwitch kernel components.")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>
---
net/openvswitch/vport-netdev.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/vport-netdev.c b/net/openvswitch/vport-netdev.c
index c42642075685d..de90d0541e172 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/vport-netdev.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/vport-netdev.c
@@ -83,6 +83,11 @@ struct vport *ovs_netdev_link(struct vport *vport, bool tunnel)
}
rtnl_lock();
+ if (vport->dev->reg_state != NETREG_REGISTERED) {
+ err = -ENODEV;
+ goto error_put_unlock;
+ }
+
err = netdev_master_upper_dev_link(vport->dev,
get_dpdev(vport->dp),
NULL, NULL, NULL);
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-05-13 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-13 9:54 Ilya Maximets [this message]
2026-05-13 12:02 ` [PATCH net] openvswitch: vport: fix race between linking and the device notifier Aaron Conole
2026-05-13 16:55 ` Ilya Maximets
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260513095541.2010516-1-i.maximets@ovn.org \
--to=i.maximets@ovn.org \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox