Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
To: claudiu.manoil@nxp.com, vladimir.oltean@nxp.com,
	xiaoning.wang@nxp.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
	davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.horghidan@nxp.com
Subject: [PATCH net 5/6] net: enetc: fix initialization order to prevent use of uninitialized resources
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 18:30:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260513103021.2190593-6-wei.fang@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260513103021.2190593-1-wei.fang@nxp.com>

Sashiko reported a potential issue in enetc_msg_psi_init() where the IRQ
handler is registered before DMA resources are fully initialized [1].

The current initialization sequence is:

  1. request_irq(enetc_msg_psi_msix)    <- IRQ handler registered
  2. INIT_WORK(&pf->msg_task, ...)      <- work_struct initialized
  3. enetc_msg_alloc_mbx()              <- mailbox DMA allocated

This ordering is unsafe because if a spurious interrupt or pending
interrupt from a previous device state fires immediately after
request_irq() returns, the registered ISR enetc_msg_psi_msix() will
execute and unconditionally call:

  schedule_work(&pf->msg_task)

At this point, pf->msg_task has not been initialized by INIT_WORK(), so
the work_struct contains garbage values in its internal linked list
pointers (work_struct->entry). Passing an uninitialized work_struct to
schedule_work() could corrupt the kernel's workqueue linked lists,
potentially leading to:

  - Kernel panic in __queue_work()
  - Memory corruption in workqueue data structures
  - System deadlock or undefined behavior

Additionally, even if the work_struct were initialized, the mailbox DMA
buffers (pf->rxmsg[]) may not yet be allocated when the work handler
enetc_msg_task() runs, resulting in NULL pointer dereference.

Fix by reordering the initialization sequence to ensure all resources are
properly initialized before the interrupt handler can execute:

  1. INIT_WORK(&pf->msg_task, ...)      <- Initialize work first
  2. enetc_msg_alloc_mbx()              <- Allocate all mailboxes
  3. request_irq(enetc_msg_psi_msix)    <- Register IRQ last
  4. Configure hardware & enable MR interrupts

This guarantees that when enetc_msg_psi_msix() runs:
  - pf->msg_task is properly initialized (safe for schedule_work)
  - pf->rxmsg[] buffers are allocated (safe for work handler access)
  - Hardware is configured appropriately

Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260511080805.2052495-1-wei.fang%40nxp.com #1
Fixes: beb74ac878c8 ("enetc: Add vf to pf messaging support")
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
---
 .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_msg.c  | 24 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_msg.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_msg.c
index fe9680a97b0e..c156a566a751 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_msg.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_msg.c
@@ -109,6 +109,15 @@ int enetc_msg_psi_init(struct enetc_pf *pf)
 	struct enetc_si *si = pf->si;
 	int vector, i, err;
 
+	/* initialize PSI mailbox */
+	INIT_WORK(&pf->msg_task, enetc_msg_task);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < pf->num_vfs; i++) {
+		err = enetc_msg_alloc_mbx(si, i);
+		if (err)
+			goto free_mbx;
+	}
+
 	/* register message passing interrupt handler */
 	snprintf(pf->msg_int_name, sizeof(pf->msg_int_name), "%s-vfmsg",
 		 si->ndev->name);
@@ -117,32 +126,21 @@ int enetc_msg_psi_init(struct enetc_pf *pf)
 	if (err) {
 		dev_err(&si->pdev->dev,
 			"PSI messaging: request_irq() failed!\n");
-		return err;
+		goto free_mbx;
 	}
 
 	/* set one IRQ entry for PSI message receive notification (SI int) */
 	enetc_wr(&si->hw, ENETC_SIMSIVR, ENETC_SI_INT_IDX);
 
-	/* initialize PSI mailbox */
-	INIT_WORK(&pf->msg_task, enetc_msg_task);
-
-	for (i = 0; i < pf->num_vfs; i++) {
-		err = enetc_msg_alloc_mbx(si, i);
-		if (err)
-			goto err_init_mbx;
-	}
-
 	/* enable MR interrupts */
 	enetc_msg_enable_mr_int(&si->hw);
 
 	return 0;
 
-err_init_mbx:
+free_mbx:
 	for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
 		enetc_msg_free_mbx(si, i);
 
-	free_irq(vector, si);
-
 	return err;
 }
 
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-13 10:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-13 10:30 [PATCH net 0/6] net: enetc: SR-IOV robustness and security fixes Wei Fang
2026-05-13 10:30 ` [PATCH net 1/6] net: enetc: validate VF primary MAC address before configuration Wei Fang
2026-05-13 10:30 ` [PATCH net 2/6] net: enetc: fix race condition in VF MAC address configuration Wei Fang
2026-05-13 10:30 ` [PATCH net 3/6] net: enetc: fix use-after-free in mailbox cleanup on interrupt race Wei Fang
2026-05-13 10:30 ` [PATCH net 4/6] net: enetc: avoid VF->PF mailbox timeout during SR-IOV teardown Wei Fang
2026-05-13 10:30 ` Wei Fang [this message]
2026-05-13 10:30 ` [PATCH net 6/6] net: enetc: add ratelimiting to VF mailbox error messages Wei Fang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260513103021.2190593-6-wei.fang@nxp.com \
    --to=wei.fang@nxp.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=catalin.horghidan@nxp.com \
    --cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox